Does Judaism Frown on Fun?

אמר שמואל כל היושב בתענית נקרא חוטא סבר כי האי תנא דתניא ר' אלעזר הקפר ברבי אומר מה תלמוד לומר (במדבר ו, יא) וכפר עליו מאשר חטא על הנפש וכי באיזה נפש חטא זה אלא שציער עצמו מן היין והלא דברים קל וחומר ומה זה שלא ציער עצמו אלא מן היין נקרא חוטא המצער עצמו מכל דבר ודבר על אחת כמה וכמה ר' אלעזר אומר נקרא קדוש שנאמר (במדבר ו, ה) קדוש יהיה גדל פרע שער ראשו ומה זה שלא ציער עצמו אלא מדבר אחד נקרא קדוש המצער עצמו מכל דבר על אחת כמה וכמה

Shmuel said: Anyone who sits and fasts is called a sinner. This is in accordance with this tanna: As it is taught, Rabbi Elazar HaKafar B'Rebbe says, What is the meaning of the verse (Numbers 6:11) "And he [the Nazir] shall atone on account of his sin against the soul"--for what soul did he sin against? Rather, because he pained himself by abstaining from wine. And isn't it logical that if one who only pains himself by abstaining from wine is called a sinner, all the more so one who pains himself by abstaining from all things! Rabbi Elazar said, he [the Nazir] is called holy, as it says (Numbers 6:5), "He shall be holy; he shall grow the hair of his head without cutting." And just as one who only causes himself pain by abstaining from one thing is called holy, one who does so in all things, all the more so!

(ב) קדושים תהיו - הוו פרושים מן העריות ומן העבירה, שכל מקום שאתה מוצא גדר ערווה אתה מוצא קדושה, לשון רש"י. אבל בתורת כוהנים (פרשה א ב): ראיתי סתם, פרושים תהיו. וכן שנו שם (שמיני פרק יב ג), והתקדשתם והייתם קדושים כי קדוש אני, כשם שאני קדוש כך אתם תהיו קדושים, כשם שאני פרוש כך אתם תהיו פרושים. ולפי דעתי אין הפרישות הזו לפרוש מן העריות כדברי הרב, אבל הפרישות היא המוזכרת בכל מקום בתלמוד, שבעליה נקראים פרושים. והעניין כי התורה הזהירה בעריות ובמאכלים האסורים והתירה הביאה איש באשתו ואכילת הבשר והיין, א"כ ימצא בעל התאווה מקום להיות שטוף בזימת אשתו או נשיו הרבות, ולהיות בסובאי יין בזוללי בשר למו, וידבר כרצונו בכל הנבלות, שלא הוזכר איסור זה בתורה, והנה יהיה נבל ברשות התורה. לפיכך בא הכתוב, אחרי שפרט האיסורים שאסר אותם לגמרי, וציווה בדבר כללי שנהיה פרושים מן המותרות... ויקדש עצמו מן היין במיעוטו, כמו שקרא הכתוב (במדבר ו ה): הנזיר קדוש, ויזכור הרעות הנזכרות ממנו בתורה בנח ובלוט...

You shall be holy-Be separate from sexual transgressions and sin, because wherever you find a barrier to sexual transgression you find holiness-- that is the language of Rashi. But in Torat Kohanim I found simply, "You shall be separate." For it is taught here, "You shall sanctify yourselves and be holy for I am holy; as I am separate, you shall be separate. And in my opinion, this separation is not just about separation from sexual transgressions as Rashi says, but all the separations mentioned in the Talmud, whose masters all called "separate ones." And the matter is that the Torah warned regarding sexual transgressions and forbidden foods, but permitted sex within marriage and consuming meat and wine, and therefore a desirous person can be immersed in sexual relations with his wife or with many wives, or to be among drunkards and gluttons, and to speak freely of vulgarities, because there is no explicity probibition in the Torah, and therefore one can be vile within the bounds of the Torah. Therefore, after specifying particular total prohibitions, the verse comes and commands more broadly that we should be separate from things that are permitted... and one should sanctify himself through limiting wine consumption, as the verse calls the Nazir holy, and mentions the bad outcomes [from drinking] in the Torah in the cases of Noah and Lot...

Kuzari 2:50

The Rabbi: The divine law imposes no asceticism on us. It rather desires that we should keep the equipoise, and grant every mental and physical faculty its due, as much as it can bear, without overburdening one faculty at the expense of another. If a person gives way to licentiousness he blunts his mental faculty; he who is inclined to violence injures some other faculty. Prolonged fasting is no act of piety for a weak person who, having succeeded in checking his desires, is not greedy. For him feasting is a burden and self-denial. Neither is diminution of wealth an act of piety, if it is gained in a lawful way, and if its acquisition does not interfere with study and good works, especially for him who has a household and children. He may spend part of it in almsgiving, which would not be displeasing to God; but to increase it is better for himself. Our law, as a whole, is divided between fear, love, and joy, by each of which one can approach God. Thy contrition on a fast day does nothing the nearer to God than thy joy on the Sabbath and holy days, if it is the outcome of a devout heart. Just as prayers demand devotion, so also is a pious mind necessary to find pleasure in God's command and law; that thou shouldst be pleased with the law itself from love of the Lawgiver.

R' Samson Raphael Hirsch, Nineteen Letters, Letter 4

...Whoever in his time, with his equipment of powers and means, in his condition, fulfills the will of God toward the creatures who enter into his circle, who injures none and assists every one according to his power, to reach the goal marked out for it by God — he is a man! He practices righteousness and love in his existence here below. His whole life, his whole being, his thoughts and feelings, his speech and action, even his business transactions and enjoyments — all of these are service of God. Such a life is exalted above all mutation.

Whether enjoyment or privation, whether abundance or need be one's lot, whether tears of resigned sorrow or joy exultant be shed — the truly human personality, unchangeable almost as Deity, sees in every gain or loss only another summons to solve afresh the same problem. Thus man in his earthly frame belongs to earth, and his terrestrial existence is full of significance. As no passing breath, and no ephemeral grass-blade or butterfly exists for nought, but furnishes its contribution, slight though it be, which God's wisdom uses for the upbuilding of the All ; thus also no pleasure, no thought, no deed, trifling though it be, is empty and purposeless; those which are right are finished work delivered into the hand of God that He may employ them for the completion of His universe-plan. Fulfillment of the Divine will with our property and our pleasures, with our thoughts, words, and deeds, that should be the contents of our lives.

The Religious Thought of Hasidism- Rabbi Norman Lamm (pp. 323-324)

Worship through corporeality, or avodah be-gashmiyut, is one of the most important contributions of Hasidism to Jewish religious thought...

Worship through corporeality brought into the domain of religious significance the entire range of human activity, even beyond the con­siderable aspects of human life already covered by the mitzvot and the Halakhah—the forbidden and permitted and required. Divrei reshut— all that is neutral halakhically, that upon which Halakhah makes no explicit judgment but which occupies most of one’s waking day—was now seen as a challenge and an opportunity to achieve devekut and thus to serve the Creator.

Eating is as good an example of avodah be-gashmiyut as any. As an intimate physical activity, the ingestion of food, no less than its evac­uation, embarrassed the ancients. The Greeks solved the problem by means of aesthetics; they imposed etiquette on ingestion, thus vali­dating it as an acceptable public exercise. Jewish tradition added a sacred dimension: the appropriate blessings before and after eating, attention to the dietary laws, etc. The response of Hasidism was avodah be-gashmiyut: sanctifying the very act of eating itself, beyond the rules of “proper behavior (derekh eretz) and Halakhah.

This idea of worship through corporeality addressed another prob­lem as well. Hasidism had set for its adherents an enormously difficult challenge, that of uninterrupted devekut. How could such a high state of rapture or even fundamental God-consciousness be maintained when a myriad of prosaic and mundane details demanded attention in the course of each day? When these very mundane activities them­selves became the vehicle for devekut, that problem disappeared. The physical or social involvements were exalted and the devekut was con­tinued, albeit in a new form. Whether eating and drinking, plying one’s trade or dealing in business, one must intend to release the ''sparks” that vitalize all that exists and reveal the immanence of the Creator in His creation.

L'Nevuchai HaDor- Rav Kook

(כה) ומי לא יבין שבעת המאושרה ההיא, ש״העירים... בליל חמיץ יאכלו אשר זרה ברחת ובמזרה״ . מפני שכל כך ירומם אותם האדם ויפנק תכונתם ושאר רוחם, אי אפשר להעלות על הדעת שיקח האדם את בניו ברוח אשר יטפחם וירבה אותם להיטיב ולהשכיל ויזבח אותם באכזריות חמה. על כן העמיקה תורה בתנאי הקרבנות ״לרצנכם תזבחהו״, להורות על מעלת התרבות שבתקופת הקרבנות. על כן יחסה תורה הקרבנות לצפון, הצד המיוחס במורשה להאומה לחסרון ההשלמה, ״עולם לאכסדרה הוא דומה ורוח צפונית אינה מסובבת״ להורות שמצד החסרון האנושי יש מקום לקרבנות כדברינו כל זמן שלתשמישי חול ינעמו לו בשר החי, ועוד במועד יותר מאוחר כפי ערך ההגבלה הראויה לשמירה הבטוחה של שלימות המוסרית. ובודאי יקדים הרבה פרי המוסר העליון להגמר אצל ישראל ועוד יהיו נוהגים הקרבנות ״עולותיהם וזבחיהם לרצון על מזבחי כי ביתי בית תפלה יקרא לכל העמים״. והתעודה האחרונה תהיה כי הר ד' יהיה הר המוריה, לצאת ממנו אורה והוריה לעולם. ובית תפילה במקום בית זבח.

(25) Who cannot understand that at that fortunate time, where (Isaiah 30:24) “the young donkeys… shall eat clean provender which has been winnowed with the shovel and the fan,” that this will be because humanity will elevate animals so much, and will nurture their traits and the rest of their spirit, that it would be impossible to entertain the thought that man would take his children in spirit whom he has nurtured, caused to proliferate, improving them and to making them intelligent, and then to sacrifice them with seething cruelty. Therefore, the Torah embedded sacrifices with a condition: “according to your will shall you sacrifice”, to teach us what the level of society is during the era of sacrifices. Therefore, the Torah creates a relationship between sacrifices and the north, and it is our national heritage that that side is [considered] deficient in its completeness, “the world is like a patio, and the northern wind does not circumvent it” (Bava Batra 25a), to teach us that only because of human deficiency is there a place for sacrifices, so long as there is an enjoyment of meat from living things for non-sanctified purposes, and [even] further in that much later time period when [the eating of meat is still] appropriate for the guarding of the ethical perfection [so that we do not slide back]. Certainly the ethical fruit is going ripen much earlier for the Jews, they will still be doing sacrifices, (Isaiah 56:7) “their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted on My altar, for My house shall be called the house of prayer for all nations.” And the ultimate fate will be that the “mountain of God” will be Mount Moriah, that it should be a source of “orah” [light] and “horiah” [teaching] to the world. And it will be a "house of prayer" instead of a "house of sacrifices."