Save " Finding Light in Dark Places  How the Menorah Inspires "
Finding Light in Dark Places How the Menorah Inspires
(ב) דַּבֵּר֙ אֶֽל־אַהֲרֹ֔ן וְאָמַרְתָּ֖ אֵלָ֑יו בְּהַעֲלֹֽתְךָ֙ אֶת־הַנֵּרֹ֔ת אֶל־מוּל֙ פְּנֵ֣י הַמְּנוֹרָ֔ה יָאִ֖ירוּ שִׁבְעַ֥ת הַנֵּרֽוֹת׃
(2) Speak to Aaron and say to him, “When you mount the lamps, let the seven lamps give light at the front of the lampstand.”
(ב) בהעלתך. עַל שֵׁם שֶׁהַלַּהַב עוֹלֶה, כָּתוּב בְּהַדְלָקָתָן לְשׁוֹן עֲלִיָּה, שֶׁצָּרִיךְ לְהַדְלִיק עַד שֶׁתְּהֵא שַׁלְהֶבֶת עוֹלָה מֵאֵלֶיהָ (שבת כ"א), וְעוֹד דָּרְשׁוּ רַבּוֹתֵינוּ מִכָּאן שֶׁמַּעֲלָה הָיְתָה לִפְנֵי הַמְּנוֹרָה, שֶׁעָלֶיהָ הַכֹּהֵן עוֹמֵד וּמֵטִיב (ספרי):
(2) בהעלתך lit., When you mount the lamps — Because the flame rises upwards (עולה), an expression denoting “ascending” is used of kindling them (the lights), implying that one must kindle them until the light ascends of itself (Shabbat 21a). — Furthermore our Rabbis derived from here (from the expression בהעלתך) that there was a step in front of the candelabrum upon which the priest stood while preparing the lights (Sifrei Bamidbar 59).
What is implied by the need to "raise up" light?
How is the step up to the menorah a message to us for what is our task in facing darkness and bringing light?
אל מול פני המנורה. פירוש והאיר אל עבר פניה והנה מלת האיר יוצאה כמו תאיר נרי ואין כן יאירו והארץ האירה ונסמכה זאת הפרשה להורות כי הדבור יהיה גם בלילה כי שם יהיה הנר דלוק ולא יכבה:
IN FRONT OF THE CANDLESTICK. This explains to give light (he’ir) over against it (Ex. 25:37). Now the word he’ir (give light) is transitive. It is similar to the word ta’ir (dost light) in For Thou dost light my light (Ps. 18:29). However, this is not the case with the word ya’iru (shall give light) and the word he’irah (did shine) in and the earth did shine (Ezek. 43:2). This section follows in order to teach that God’s word also came at night, for the light was to burn in the tabernacle and was not to be extinguished.
Why is it important for God's word to come at night? What does this allude to?
יאירו שבעת הנרות כל השבעה יאירו וישפיעו אור עליון לישראל שיורו היות אור הימנים ואור השמאלים מכוון ופונה אל אור הקנה האמצעי שהוא עיקר המנורה ושכן ראוי שכונת המימינים העוסקים בחיי עולם והמשמאלים העוסקים בחיי שעה העוזרים למימינים, כאמרם אלמלי עלייא לא מתקיימי אתכליא (חולין צב, א) תהיה להפיק רצון האל יתברך באופן שיושג מכוונו בין כולם וירוממו את שמו יחדו כמו שקבלו עליהם כאשר העיד באמרו ויענו כל העם יחדו ויאמרו כל אשר דבר ה' נעשה כלומר בין כולנו נשלים כונתו:
יאירו שבעת הנרות, all seven lamps will fulfill their function of illuminating and being the conduits of spiritual light descending on to the Jewish people. [obviously, the individual lamps would be able to provide physical light before being positioned in the manner described. Ed.] The mussar, allegorical lesson conveyed by the lights of the menorah is us that only by the “right” side representing preoccupation with eternal values, life in the future, working together with the “left” side which represents the concerns with physical life on our planet, will we be able to attain our purpose on earth. Our sages in Chulin 92 phrased it thus: אלמלי עלייא לא מתקיימא אתכליא, “if not for the input from celestial regions, spiritual input, the creatures on earth would not be able to survive at all.” [I have not found this precise quote, but it means more literally that if there were no wise people who could tutor the ignorant, the world as we know it would collapse. Ed.] In order for this universe to function as G’d wanted it to, all social levels of the people have to make their respective contributions. A major function of the combined activity by the “tutored and the ignorant” is to ensure that G’d’s name would be hailed, revered and enthusiastically acknowledged by every segment of mankind, all of His creatures. An example of such a thing happening is found in Exodus 19,8 ויענו כל העם יחדו ויאמרו כל אשר דבר ה' נעשה, the emphasis here being on the word יחדו, i.e. all the people in unison would combine to carry out G’d’s will.
Why is Sforno speaking about the need for looking to the future being balanced by being concerned with the needs of the present?
How is he seeing this as a way to also honor every element in society?
What does this say about perspective and balance?
(ג) וַיַּ֤עַשׂ כֵּן֙ אַהֲרֹ֔ן אֶל־מוּל֙ פְּנֵ֣י הַמְּנוֹרָ֔ה הֶעֱלָ֖ה נֵרֹתֶ֑יהָ כַּֽאֲשֶׁ֛ר צִוָּ֥ה יְהֹוָ֖ה אֶת־מֹשֶֽׁה׃
(3) Aaron did so; he mounted the lamps at the front of the lampstand, as the LORD had commanded Moses.—
וזה מעשה המנורה וכו' (במדבר ח, ד) ... ונמצא בבחינה זו האדם מעלה נצוצות, כי אסור לאדם לומר שיש איזה דבר בעולם בלתי הנשפע מהשורש העליון רק שצריך האדם להסתכל הפנימיות אשר בזה הדבר, דהיינו דבר זה יש בו אהבה אזי צריך ליקח אותו האהבה ולעבוד בה את הבורא וכן בשאר המדות ונמצא מדבק לשורש ומעלה הנצוצות וזהו הרמז, כי המנורה כדמות המדות אשר העולמות עובדים בהם את הבורא והם שבע מדות וזהו קני המנורה. וזהו הרמז בהעלותך את הנרות (במדבר ח, ב) דהיינו המדות לעבוד בהם את הבורא יתברך. אל מול פני המנורה המנורה הוא מרמז על השכינה המאיר באלו המדות. יאירו שבעת הנרות. וזהו זה מעשה המנורה מקשה, כלומר ליחד הכל הפנימיות אשר בזה העולם להבורא יתברך כנ"ל.
Exodus 8:4 and this is how the lampstand (candlestick) ‎was made, etc. ... It is not permissible for us to ever claim that there exist ‎phenomena in our universe that are totally apart from their ‎origin, from their holy roots. It is up to us to try and find behind ‎phenomena that appear totally divorced from their holy roots, ‎the point of contact through which such a thread, however ‎slender, still exists. According to our author, the ‎פנימיות‎, inner ‎essence, of any phenomenon, is a reflection of this “love.” In ‎order to serve the Lord properly, the worshipper must get hold of ‎this “love” and use it as the vehicle with which he relates to his ‎Creator. He considers that other ‎מדות‎, attributes, virtues, must be ‎used in a similar manner. He claims that there are a total of seven ‎such ‎מדות‎, virtues, and that the seven arms of the lampstand, or ‎candlestick in the Tabernacle, symbolized these seven virtues. He ‎considers Numbers 8,2 as the key phrase in the Torah referring to ‎this concept, when the Torah writes: ‎בהעלותך את הנרות אל מול פני ‏המנורה יאירו שבעת הנרות‎, “when you elevate the lights of the ‎lampstand they shall be focused on the center shaft so that all ‎seven lamps will be providing light.” The “centre shaft” ‎symbolizes the Sh’chinah, presence of G’d.‎At that point the Torah continues with the words: ‎וזה מעשה ‏המנורה מקשה‎, “and this is the essential ingredient of this ‎lampstand, it is hammered out of a single piece (of gold)”. This ‎verse teaches that true Judaism when it is practiced with all the ‎required virtues, will result in a completely unified, harmonious ‎personality of the worshipper. It is our task in this multifaceted ‎material universe, to reflect the unity of the Creator by emulating ‎His virtues to the best of our knowledge and ability.‎
There are commentaries that speak of how details related to the menorah help us understand how to cope with, overcome and even transcend the anguish of suffering and loss. The following text offers an overarching philosophy for why we suffer. Some questions to consider:
1. Is the notion of "afflictions of love" (yissurin shel ahavah) comforting or troubling?
2. Which is harder to accept - the suffering of those who are good or righteous or the good fortune of the wicked?
אָמַר רָבָא, אָמַר רַב סְחוֹרָה, אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: כׇּל שֶׁהַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא חָפַץ בּוֹ — מְדַכְּאוֹ בְּיִסּוּרִין, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וַה׳ חָפֵץ דַּכְּאוֹ הֶחֱלִי״.
So too, Rava said that Rav Seḥora said that Rav Huna said: Anyone in whom the Holy One, Blessed be He, delights, He oppresses him with suffering, as it is stated: “Yet in whom the Lord delights, He oppresses him with disease; to see if his soul would offer itself in guilt, that he might see his children, lengthen his days, and that the desire of the Lord might prosper by his hand” (Isaiah 53:10). This verse illustrates that in whomever God delights, he afflicts with illness.
Yitzchak Blau, "Afflictions of Love: The Relationship between Suffering and Sin"
Both the Maharal (Netivot Olam, Netiv Ha-yissurin 1) and the Ran (Derashot Ha-Ran, p. 174) explain that affliction sometimes promote personal religious growth. For the Maharal, suffering helps break our attachment to the material; for the Ran, suffering helps free us from the snare of wild imagination. Either way, the afflictions help us focus our attention on the most important things in life ...
Struggling with frustrations and difficulties often brings out new reservoirs of strength and helps us realize aspects of our humanity that we would not have found otherwise.
John Hick, a contemporary theologian, builds a similar theodicy in his Evil and the God of Love. He contrasts a pet owner with a parent. The former is solely interested in providing a life of comfort for the pet. The latter is interested in the personal growth and development of the child. This will sometimes include decisions that make life more taxing for the child because in those struggles, the child achieves religious, ethical and personal maturity.
https://www.etzion.org.il/en/talmud/studies-gemara/midrash-and-aggada/afflictions-love-relationship-between-suffering-and-sin
Shlomo Carmy, "Tell Them I've Had a Good Enough Life", Torah U'Madda Journal 8 (1998-1999)
The problem of evil has long been the greatest philosophical challenge to traditional religion. This conundrum often leads people in one of two directions. Either they adopt a rationalistic theodicy that too easily assumes it can explain everything, or they assume an agnostic position that denies Divine involvement in human affairs. Rabbi Carmy calls for a third alternative of "pious acceptance" in which the sufferer accepts God’s providential role but does not presume to know how God works. To get to this third position, one must abandon the third-person perspective of "forensic theodicy," a perspective that lends itself to neat intellectual categories, and adopt the first-person perspective of how real people deal with their tribulations.
This third position demands seeing Divine management of the world as a balance between general providence and individual providence. Any position that ignores the latter forsakes our traditional understanding of Divine concern for each individual person. Any position that ignores the former runs the risk of arrogance in assuming constant worthiness for acute providence and loses the important religious emotion of pained distance from God.