Burnout, or Moral Injury? What Nadav and Avihu Can Teach Us About the Healing Professions
(א) וַיִּקְח֣וּ בְנֵֽי־אַ֠הֲרֹן נָדָ֨ב וַאֲבִיה֜וּא אִ֣ישׁ מַחְתָּת֗וֹ וַיִּתְּנ֤וּ בָהֵן֙ אֵ֔שׁ וַיָּשִׂ֥ימוּ עָלֶ֖יהָ קְטֹ֑רֶת וַיַּקְרִ֜בוּ לִפְנֵ֤י יְהוָה֙ אֵ֣שׁ זָרָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֧ר לֹ֦א צִוָּ֖ה אֹתָֽם׃ (ב) וַתֵּ֥צֵא אֵ֛שׁ מִלִּפְנֵ֥י יְהוָ֖ה וַתֹּ֣אכַל אוֹתָ֑ם וַיָּמֻ֖תוּ לִפְנֵ֥י יְהוָֽה׃ (ג) וַיֹּ֨אמֶר מֹשֶׁ֜ה אֶֽל־אַהֲרֹ֗ן הוּא֩ אֲשֶׁר־דִּבֶּ֨ר יְהוָ֤ה ׀ לֵאמֹר֙ בִּקְרֹבַ֣י אֶקָּדֵ֔שׁ וְעַל־פְּנֵ֥י כָל־הָעָ֖ם אֶכָּבֵ֑ד וַיִּדֹּ֖ם אַהֲרֹֽן׃
(1) Now Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu each took his fire pan, put fire in it, and laid incense on it; and they offered before the LORD alien fire, which He had not enjoined upon them. (2) And fire came forth from the LORD and consumed them; thus they died at the instance of the LORD. (3) Then Moses said to Aaron, “This is what the LORD meant when He said: Through those near to Me I show Myself holy, And gain glory before all the people.” And Aaron was silent.

Arnold B. Baker and Patricia L. Costa. Chronic Job Burnout and Daily Functioning: A Theoretical Analysis:

"Burnout is a syndrome characterized by chronic exhaustion, cynicism, and a lack of personal accomplishment. It is usually defined as “…a state of exhaustion in which one is cynical about the value of one's occupation and doubtful of one's capacity to perform” (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1996, p. 20). Emotional exhaustion is the central strain dimension of burnout, described as feelings of being emotionally drained by one's work. Cynicism is a negative or excessively detached response to the work itself and/or to the individuals with whom employees’ interact while performing their job. Finally, lack of personal accomplishment refers to a decline in one's feelings of competence and of successful achievement at work (Maslach et al., 2001, Schaufeli et al., 2009b). Burned-out individuals simultaneously experience high levels of chronic fatigue, and distance themselves emotionally and cognitively from their work activities."

(א) איש מחתתו. כל איש לקח מחתתו ולפי דעתי שזה הדבר היה גם ביום השמיני והעד הן היום הקריבו את חטאתם: (ב) ויתנו בהן אש. לא מהאש שיצאה וזה טעם אש זרה: (ג) וטעם אשר לא צוה אותם. שמדעתם עשו ולא בצווי להקטיר קטורת גם באש זרה: (א) וימותו לפני ה׳‎. כי חשבו שעשו דבר רצוי לפניו: (א) הוא אשר דבר ה׳‎. כבר אמר לי השם שהוא יראה קדושתו בקרובים אליו כטעם רק אתכם ידעתי וכאשר אראה בם קדושתי אז אהיה נכבד ועל פני כל העם אכבד וייראו ממני:
(1) his coal-pan each one took his own coal-pan. In my opinion, this event also occurred “on the eighth day”; and this is borne out later on: “…they had already sacrificed their sin-offering…today” [:19]. (2) put fire in it this fire was not taken from the fire that had descended from God [9:24] — it was “unconsecrated fire”. (3) which He had not commanded them both the burning of the incense and the use of unconsecrated fire were their own idea, not a commandment. (1) they died before God thinking they were doing something acceptable to God. (1) This is what God has told me God has already told me that He will manifest His holiness through those who are near Him — even if they must suffer for it, as in the passage “You only have I known…” [Amos 3:2]. Thus the verse means, “When I manifest myself in holiness among them, then I shall be glorified; and I shall be glorified in the face of all the people, and they shall fear Me.”
(ב) ותצא אש פרש״‎י רבי אליעזר אומר לא מתו בני אהרן אלא על ידי שהורו הלכה בפני משה רבן. פירוש דרשו אע״‎פ שהאש יורדת מן השמים מצוה להביא מן ההדיוט שנאמר ונתנו בני אהרן אש וגו׳‎ ולא שאלו את פי משה רבן כדכתיב אשר לא צוה אותם והיה להם לימלך במשה רבן כמו ששנינו במסכת תענית שנענש יאשיהו ונהרג על שהיה לו לימלך בירמיה ולא נמלך כשהעביר פרעה נכה חרב בארצו. וי״‎א טעו בהוראתו להקריב באותו יום אש זרה ומה שכתוב ונתנו בני אהרן הכהנים אש שאעפ״‎י שהיא יורדת מן השמים מצוה להביא מן ההדיוט, היינו מאותו יום ואילך שכבר ירדה מן השמים אבל באותו יום שעדיין לא ירדה מן השמים ורצה הקב״‎ה להתכבד בה לעיני כל העם לא צוה אותם והיינו דכתיב אשר לא צוה אותם שלא למעט כבוד שכינה כמו שמצינו באליהו ואש לא תשימו.
(2) ותצא אש; according to Rashi, quoting Rabbi Eliezer, the reason why the sons of Aaron were killed was that they had arrogated to themselves the right to render halachic rulings while their mentor Moses was alive and well, to do this himself. What prompted them to do this? They reasoned that although the fire to burn up the incense was provided by heaven it was still a mitzvah to add manmade fire, seeing that the Torah has written in Leviticus 1,7, “the sons of Aaron are to put fire on the altar.” ונתנו בני אהרן הכהן אש על המזבח. They failed to confirm with their teacher Moses that they had correctly interpreted this verse. This is why the Torah wrote: “which He had not commanded them.” We have a clear statement in the Talmud, tractate Taanit folio 22, that the King Yoshiahu, [the most observant King the Kingdom of Yehudah ever ruled, was punished and killed by enemy troops for having failed to check with the prophet Jeremiah if to go to war against the Egyptians, who only wanted right of passage. Ed.] There is another opinion according to whom the sin of Nadav and Avihu was not the fact that they brought alien fire into the Sanctuary, but that they had done it on that day. As far as the verse we quoted from Leviticus 1,7, is concerned, the instructions of that verse were to become effective only after the first day on which the Tabernacle operated under the leadership of the High Priest, Aaron. They were also misled as heavenly fire on previous days when Moses performed the service in the Tabernacle had occurred earlier in the day. The reason why G-d had delayed was that He wished to be honoured by a large turnout of the people who would witness that event. This would then be the meaning of the words in verse 1: “that He had not commanded them.” G-d had waited, not as on the occasion of the revelation on Mount Sinai when in spite of having previously announced that He would manifest His glory on the Mountain, He had done so but the people had not bothered to rise early. (Compare Exodus19,11, 16, 1718) Nadav and Avihu meant to avoid G-d’s honour not being sufficiently appreciated by the people. We find something parallel in Kings I 18,25, where the prophet Elijah tells the priests of the Baal not to set fire to their offerings.
(א) וידום אהרן שהתנחם בקידוש ה' שנקדש במותם:
(1) וידום אהרן, seeing he consoled himself after having been told that the death of his sons represented a sanctification of the name of the Lord.

Ellen Frankel, The Five Books of Miriam, pp. 160-1 (Elisheva, wife of Aaron and mother of Nadab and Abihu, is speaking):

"All of the people shall observe a period of mourning," he announced, "and all the house of Israel shall bewail the burning that YHVH has wrought. But Aaron, together with Elazar and Itamar, Aaron's two remaining sons"- were they not my sons as well, my only two sons now that Nadab and Abihu were no more! - "these three shall not bare their heads nor rend their clothes, lest they die and anger strike the whole community. They shall remain within the Tent of Meeting." And then, without another word, he retreated back into the tent.

What was I to do now? Was I allowed to mourn? And who would comfort me, with my husband and two sons separated from me in the Tabernacle? But whether God wanted me to or not, I chose to mourn. If I was to be forbidden entrance to the holy altar, forbidden to accompany my dead sons outside the camp, forbidden even to seek comfort with my husband and two remaining sons, then I would not refuse the comfort of my community.

Simon G. Talbot and Wendy Dean, STAT News, July 26, 2018. Physicians aren't 'burning out.' They're suffering from moral injury.

The term “moral injury” was first used to describe soldiers’ responses to their actions in war. It represents “perpetrating, failing to prevent, bearing witness to, or learning about acts that transgress deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.” Journalist Diane Silver describes it as “a deep soul wound that pierces a person’s identity, sense of morality, and relationship to society.”

The moral injury of health care is not the offense of killing another human in the context of war. It is being unable to provide high-quality care and healing in the context of health care.

Most physicians enter medicine following a calling rather than a career path. They go into the field with a desire to help people. Many approach it with almost religious zeal, enduring lost sleep, lost years of young adulthood, huge opportunity costs, family strain, financial instability, disregard for personal health, and a multitude of other challenges. Each hurdle offers a lesson in endurance in the service of one’s goal which, starting in the third year of medical school, is sharply focused on ensuring the best care for one’s patients. Failing to consistently meet patients’ needs has a profound impact on physician wellbeing — this is the crux of consequent moral injury.

....

Navigating an ethical path among such intensely competing drivers (patient satisfaction surveys, profit margins, electronic documentation) is emotionally and morally exhausting. Continually being caught between the Hippocratic oath, a decade of training, and the realities of making a profit from people at their sickest and most vulnerable is an untenable and unreasonable demand. Routinely experiencing the suffering, anguish, and loss of being unable to deliver the care that patients need is deeply painful. These routine, incessant betrayals of patient care and trust are examples of “death by a thousand cuts.” Any one of them, delivered alone, might heal. But repeated on a daily basis, they coalesce into the moral injury of health care.