Aruch HaShulchan, The Laws of Tzedakah, 250:10
ערוך השולחן יורה דעה הלכות צדקה סימן רנ סעיף י
שלא יחזרו על הפתחים אלא תהיה פרנסתן מוטלת על הציבור לפי ממון הדין עם הבינונים כי עיקר חיוב הצדקה לפי הממון ויש מקומות נוהגין ליתן כפי הנדבה ויש לפי המס והנותן לפי ברכתו ראוי יותר לברכה עכ"ל וכ"ז הוא מתשו' הרשב"א [ח"ג סי' ש"פ] והוסיף לומר בלשון זה שורת הדין כדברי הבינונים וכו' אלא שהדור נדלדל ואין עשירות לא בכיס ולא בדעת ומ"מ בכל המקומות מפרנסין לפי הקופה ולפי ממון ואם יחזרו אח"כ על הפתחים יחזרו וכל אחד יתן לפי דעתו ורצונו וכו' עכ"ל
The authors of the Shulchan Aruch, paragraph 5 wrote that if the poor of the city are many, the rich say that they should beg door-to-door, and the middle class say that they should not beg door-to-door. Rather, their sustenance should be incumbent upon the public according to their wealth. The law agrees with the middle class, because the essence of the obligation of tzedakah is according to one’s wealth. There are places where the custom is to give voluntarily and others where there is a tax and the giving is done according to the giver’s wishes. One who gives according to how they were blessed, it is suitable that they will be further blessed - until here are the Shulchan Aruch’s words. This is all from a responsum of Rashba (chapter 280), and he goes on to say in this vein that the strict law is according to the words of the middle class, etc. Rather, this generation is impoverished, and there is no wealthy, neither in pocket nor in knowledge. In any case, every place must sustain the poor according to the public tzedakah fund and according to the wealth of the community in general. If afterward they beg door-to-door, let them, and each person should give according to their opinion and will, etc - until here are the words of the Rashba. [Translation by Rabbi Bruce Elder. Edited for gender neutrality]

Suggested Discussion Questions:

1. Why do the rich and the middle class disagree over how to provide money for the poor? Why does the law side with the middle class opinion?

2. Why do both opinions stress the preference over paying the poor from the tzedakah fund rather than from individuals?

3. How do you envision our community’s tzedakah distribution today?

Time Period: Modern (Spinoza through post-WWII)