Save "Open Beit Midrash: Perspectives on Chalalim from Sinai to the Knesset
"
Open Beit Midrash: Perspectives on Chalalim from Sinai to the Knesset
What is a Kohen?

(א) וְאַתָּ֡ה הַקְרֵ֣ב אֵלֶיךָ֩ אֶת־אַהֲרֹ֨ן אָחִ֜יךָ וְאֶת־בָּנָ֣יו אִתּ֔וֹ מִתּ֛וֹךְ בְּנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל לְכַהֲנוֹ־לִ֑י אַהֲרֹ֕ן נָדָ֧ב וַאֲבִיה֛וּא אֶלְעָזָ֥ר וְאִיתָמָ֖ר בְּנֵ֥י אַהֲרֹֽן׃...(מא) וּמָשַׁחְתָּ֨ אֹתָ֜ם וּמִלֵּאתָ֧ אֶת־יָדָ֛ם וְקִדַּשְׁתָּ֥ אֹתָ֖ם וְכִהֲנ֥וּ לִֽי׃

(1) You [Moses] shall bring forward your brother Aaron, with his sons, from among the Israelites, to serve Me as priests: Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar, the sons of Aaron....(41) anoint them, and ordain them and consecrate them to serve Me as priests.

(ז) אִשָּׁ֨ה זֹנָ֤ה וַחֲלָלָה֙ לֹ֣א יִקָּ֔חוּ וְאִשָּׁ֛ה גְּרוּשָׁ֥ה מֵאִישָׁ֖הּ לֹ֣א יִקָּ֑חוּ כִּֽי־קָדֹ֥שׁ ה֖וּא לֵאלֹקָֽיו׃

(7) They [kohanim] shall not marry a woman profaned by harlotry, nor shall they marry one divorced from her husband. For they are holy to their God.

What is a Chalal/ah?

(ב) חללה. שֶׁנּוֹלְדָה מִן הַפְּסוּלִים שֶׁבִּכְהֻנָּה, כְּגוֹן...בַת גְּרוּשָׁה...מִכֹּהֵן הֶדְיוֹט, וְכֵן שֶׁנִּתְחַלְּלָה מִן הַכְּהֻנָּה עַל יְדֵי בִיאַת אֶחָד מִן הַפְּסוּלִים לִכְּהֻנָּה (עי' ספרא, קידושין ע"ז):

(Written 11th century)

(2) Chalalah — This is a woman born from a marriage which is forbidden to the priesthood alone [Kiddushin 77a], e.g....the daughter of a divorced woman...and an ordinary kohen. So also it denotes a woman who became profaned in respect to kohanim (i.e. who lost the right of marrying a kohen) through her having previously entered into a union with one of those kohanim a marriage with whom comes under the term: "marriages forbidden to the priesthood alone."

(ו) בַּת חָלָל זָכָר, פְּסוּלָה מִן הַכְּהֻנָּה לְעוֹלָם.
יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁנָּשָׂא חֲלָלָה, בִּתּוֹ כְשֵׁרָה לַכְּהֻנָּה.
חָלָל שֶׁנָּשָׂא בַת יִשְׂרָאֵל, בִּתּוֹ פְסוּלָה לַכְּהֻנָּה.

(Redacted ~200 CE)

(6) The daughter of a chalal is disqualified to [marry] a kohen forever [Kiddushin 77a: after three generations].

[With regard to] a yisrael who married a chalalah, his daughter is valid to marry a kohen.

[With regard to] a chalal who married the daughter of a yisrael, his daughter is disqualified to [marry] a kohen.

(א) אֵי זוֹ הִיא חֲלָלָה זוֹ שֶׁנּוֹלִדָה מֵאִסּוּר כְּהֻנָּה. וְכֵן אַחַת מִן הַנָּשִׁים הָאֲסוּרוֹת לִכְהֻנָּה שֶׁנִּבְעֲלָה לְכֹהֵן נִתְחַלְּלָה. אֲבָל הַכֹּהֵן עַצְמוֹ שֶׁעָבַר הָעֲבֵרָה לֹא נִתְחַלֵּל:

(Published ~1180 CE)

What is meant by a chalalah? [A woman] born from [relations] forbidden to a kohen. Similarly, any woman who is forbidden to a kohen who engaged in relations with a kohen becomes a chalalah. A kohen who commits a transgression himself, however, is not deemed a chalal. (Translation adapted from chabad.org)

(י) נִמְצְאוּ הַחֲלָלִים שְׁלֹשָׁה. חָלָל מִן הַתּוֹרָה. וְחָלָל מִדִּבְרֵיהֶם. וּסְפֵק חָלָל.
וְכָל סְפֵק חָלָל נוֹתְנִין עָלָיו חֻמְרֵי כֹּהֲנִים וְחֻמְרֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל. אֵינוֹ אוֹכֵל בִּתְרוּמָה וְלֹא מִטַּמֵּא לַמֵּתִים וְנוֹשֵׂא אִשָּׁה הָרְאוּיָה לְכֹהֵן. וְאִם אָכַל אוֹ נִטְמָא אוֹ נָשָׂא גְּרוּשָׁה מַכִּין אוֹתוֹ מַכַּת מַרְדּוּת. וְהוּא הַדִּין בְּחָלָל שֶׁל דִּבְרֵיהֶם.
אֲבָל חָלָל שֶׁל תּוֹרָה הַוַּדַּאי הֲרֵי הוּא כְּזָר וְנוֹשֵׂא גְּרוּשָׁה וּמִטַּמֵּא לַמֵּתִים שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ויקרא כא א) "אֱמֹר אֶל הַכֹּהֲנִים בְּנֵי אַהֲרֹן". אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהֵם בְּנֵי אַהֲרֹן עַד שֶׁיִּהְיוּ בְּכִהוּנָם:

Thus there are three categories of chalalim: a chalal according to the Torah, a chalal according to rabbinic decree, and a person whose status as a chalal is a matter of question.

Anyone whose status as a chalal is a matter of question must observe the restrictions incumbent on kohanim and those incumbent on ordinary yisraelim. [Like a yisrael,] he may not partake of terumah [food set aside in the Temple for kohanim], he may not become impure due to contact with the dead [like a kohen], and he must marry a woman fit to marry a kohen. If he partakes of terumah, becomes impure, or marries a divorcee, he is given lashes for rebellious conduct. The same laws apply to a chalal by rabbinic decree.


When, however, a person is definitely a chalal according to the Torah, he is like [any other] non-priest. He may marry a divorcee and become impure due to contact with a corpse. [This is derived from Leviticus 21:1 which] states: "Speak to the kohanim, the descendants of Aaron." [Implied is that the prohibition that follows does not apply] even to the descendants of Aaron unless they are kohanim.

(Translation adapted from chabad.org)

(יד) חָלָל שֶׁנָּשָׂא כְּשֵׁרָה זַרְעוֹ מִמֶּנָּה חֲלָלִים. וְכֵן בֶּן בֶּן בְּנוֹ וַאֲפִלּוּ אַחַר אֶלֶף דּוֹר. שֶׁבֶּן הֶחָלָל הַזָּכָר הוּא חָלָל לְעוֹלָם. וְאִם הָיְתָה בַּת אֲסוּרָה הִיא לִכְהֻנָּה שֶׁהֲרֵי הִיא חֲלָלָה.

אֲבָל יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁנָּשָׂא חֲלָלָה הַוָּלָד כָּשֵׁר. לְפִיכָךְ אִם הָיְתָה בַּת הֲרֵי זוֹ תִּנָּשֵׂא לִכְהֻנָּה לְכַתְּחִלָּה:

When a chalal marries an acceptable woman, his descendants from her are chalalim. This also applies to the son of his son's son and indeed, even for a thousand generations. For the male son of a chalal is a chalal for all time. If the offspring is female, she is forbidden to marry a kohen, because she is a chalalah.

When, however, a yisrael marries a chalalah, the offspring are acceptable. Therefore if one of the offspring is female, she may marry a kohen at the outset.

(Translation adapted from chabad.org)

Contemporary Cases
"Israel's State-Sanctioned Adultery Blacklist," Dr. Susan Weiss, The Jewish Daily Forward, May 4, 2015, http://forward.com/sisterhood/307509/exposing-israels-adultery-list/
It’s time to talk about Israel’s blacklist. This state sanctioned registry of “untouchables” — the last public accounting of it in 2004 lists 5,305 Israelis — is a motley crew who fall under three general categorizations:
  1. People who can’t marry any type of Jew (2,835)
  2. “Unkosher” Jews who can’t marry “kosher Jews” but can marry other “unkosher Jews” or converts (235)
  3. “Kosher Jews” with issues that limit who they can marry (2,235)
...In the third category of “kosher Jews” whose options are limited are, among others: cohanim or priests who live with divorcees or converts and whose daughters are not permitted to marry other priests...
"Solemnizing the Marriage Between a Kohen and Divorcee," Rabbi Arnold M. Goodman, Committee of Jewish Law and Standards (Conservative) responsum, 1996 (EH6:1.1996)
CONCLUSIONS
1. ...The reality is that very few kohanim who turn to us for marriage are concerned about their status as kohanim. Our refusal to solemnize their marriage would only lead them to be married either in a civil ceremony or in a ceremony without full chuppah and kiddushin [traditional Jewish wedding rites].
2. ...We also no longer perceive a divorcee as a woman who has been discarded by her former husband and hence not suitable as a spouse for a kohen.
3. ...We also note the high rate of intermarriage of divorced women who are often single mothers with minor children.
4. We, therefore, support the decision of two Jews to marry even when he is a kohen and she is a divorcee, and a member of the Rabbinical Assembly may solemnize such marriage.
5. With the negating of the prohibition in Leviticus 21:7, children born of marriages between a kohen and a divorcee are not chalalim, and the kohen is no longer disqualified to serve as a kohen in our Services or rituals.
6. Such marriages may be properly celebrated in a public manner. Our goal continues to be to assured that such celebrations be kosher.
"Persistence and Flexibility: Anthropological Perspectives on the American Jewish Experience," ed. Walter P. Zenner, 231.
"The principles and practices of American Reform Judaism were established at the Philadelphia Conference of 1869 and further codified at the Pittsburgh Conference of 1885....Another plank of the Pittsburgh platform specified that the principles of Prophetic Judaism would be observed rather than the rituals mandated by traditional Rabbinic Judaism. Thus the social and ritual prerogatives of the priestly castes, the Kohanim and the Levites, were not recognized."

מקירת איש שהוחזק לכהן שרצה להתחתן לאשתו אחרי גט

א. כץ – אדם דתי שהוחזק לכהן, נשוי ל- ג. משך כמה שנים. נולדו להם 2 ילדים והיום הינם לומדים במוסדות דתיים.

ולפני כשנה וחצי עבר האיש משברים נפשיים קשים, והחליט להתגרש מאשתו. ואכן בטבת תשע"א ניתן הגט בביה"ד הרבני, אולם מעולם לא נפרד מאשתו, ובתקופה זו גם לא היה להם כלל כל כוונה להיפרד, ומיד לאחר הגט הם הלכו יחדיו הביתה והמשיכו להתנהל כזוג רגיל. לדבריו הכל היה קשור למשברים הנפשיים שעבר בתקופה זו, ולדעתו לא היה לגמרי צלול בדעתו באותו זמן, (בתקופה שנתן את הגט). ולצורך כך צירף מסמכים מכמה רופאים ופסיכיאטרים שביקר אצלם באותו שבוע.

ולכן היום הוא מתדפק על הדלתות למצוא לו היתר להמשיך לחיות עם אשתו, למרות שהוא מוחזק ככהן. והפרידה היום היא קשה מאד עבורם (ובפרט הוא עצמו שעדיין מטופל מאז בכדורים) וכמובן הדגיש, כי פירוק התא המשפחתי יהיה קשה מאד עבוד הילדים.

...

סיכום: לאחר שביארנו בארוכה ענין יחוס שמות משפחה המזוהים עם כהנים, התברר כי בכל אופן אין לקבוע עפ"י רוב אנשי משפחה זו כי הוא כהן, ולכל היותר המצב הוא מסופק. ובפרט שהגר"ש וואנר כתב אין אין משמעות לשמות משפחה בענין זה, וכך שמעתי מידידי הגר"י רפפורט שליט"א דיין ביה"ד הרבני בחיפה...כי אין משמעות לשמות משפחה כנ"ל על ייחוסם של בעלי תשובה הנושאים שמות כאלו כשאין להם כל חזקה על ייחוסם…

Case of a Presumed Kohen Who Wanted to Remarry his Wife after Divorce, Rabbi Elyashiv Knohl, Tzohar (Israeli Modern Orthodox organization), 21st century

A. Katz, a religious man who was presumed to be a kohen, was married to G. for several years. They had two children who today study in religious institutions.

A year and a half ago, the man underwent serious mental crises and, in 2011, gave his wife a writ of divorce (get). However, they were never separated, and they had no intention to separate even at the time, and continued to live like a normal couple after the divorce. According to his word, everything had to do with his emotional crises, and he claimed he was not sane at the time. He brought documents from the doctors and psychiatrists who visited him during that time.

Today, he knocks on doors to find a way to permit him to continue living with his wife, even though he is presumed to be a kohen [who can't marry a divorced woman]. The separation is very difficult for the family (especially him, as he's still on medication). Furthermore, dismantling the family permanently would be very difficult for the children.

...

Summary: After we explained the question of last names identified with kohanim it became clear that, in most cases, this family member should not be determined to be a kohen. So I heard from Rabbi Rappaport, the dayan (judge) of the rabbinical court in Haifa...that there is no implication of last names on the lineages of those who returned to observance who bear [kohen] names, because there is no established precedent of their status.

Food for Thought: Looking at Agunot, Mamzerim, and Chalalim
1. What do we make of the fact that the mamzer, chalal, and agunah are people whose lives are profoundly affected by others' misdeeds?
2. What value is there in studying biblical and rabbinic texts on these issues, especially for those who do not participate in a halakhic system?
3. How does the ethics of mamzerim, chalalim, and agunot impact those who do find meaning in a halakhic system?