(כא) וַיֹּ֨אמֶר אֶלְעָזָ֤ר הַכֹּהֵן֙ אֶל־אַנְשֵׁ֣י הַצָּבָ֔א הַבָּאִ֖ים לַמִּלְחָמָ֑ה זֹ֚את חֻקַּ֣ת הַתּוֹרָ֔ה אֲשֶׁר־צִוָּ֥ה ה׳ אֶת־מֹשֶֽׁה׃ (כב) אַ֥ךְ אֶת־הַזָּהָ֖ב וְאֶת־הַכָּ֑סֶף אֶֽת־הַנְּחֹ֙שֶׁת֙ אֶת־הַבַּרְזֶ֔ל אֶֽת־הַבְּדִ֖יל וְאֶת־הָעֹפָֽרֶת׃ (כג) כׇּל־דָּבָ֞ר אֲשֶׁר־יָבֹ֣א בָאֵ֗שׁ תַּעֲבִ֤ירוּ בָאֵשׁ֙ וְטָהֵ֔ר אַ֕ךְ בְּמֵ֥י נִדָּ֖ה יִתְחַטָּ֑א וְכֹ֨ל אֲשֶׁ֧ר לֹֽא־יָבֹ֛א בָּאֵ֖שׁ תַּעֲבִ֥ירוּ בַמָּֽיִם׃ (כד) וְכִבַּסְתֶּ֧ם בִּגְדֵיכֶ֛ם בַּיּ֥וֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִ֖י וּטְהַרְתֶּ֑ם וְאַחַ֖ר תָּבֹ֥אוּ אֶל־הַֽמַּחֲנֶֽה׃ {ס}
(21) Eleazar the priest said to the troops who had taken part in the fighting, “This is the ritual law that ה׳ has enjoined upon Moses: (22) Gold and silver, copper, iron, tin, and lead— (23) any article that can withstand fire—these you shall pass through fire and they shall be pure, except that they must be purified with water of lustration; and anything that cannot withstand fire you must pass through water. (24) On the seventh day you shall wash your clothes and be pure, and after that you may enter the camp.”
It is highly unusual for Elazar to be instructing Benei Yisrael in mitzvot - that is usually Moshe's job. The rabbis were very concerned about people trying to "show Moshe up" by teaching or deciding halakha while he was present. So what gives?
רש׳׳י:
ויאמר אלעזר הכהן וגומר – לפי שבא משה לכלל כעס בא לכלל טעות, שנתעלמה ממנו הילכות גיעולי גוים. וכן אתה מוצא בשביעי למילואים, שנאמר: ויקצוף משה על אלעזר ועל איתמר (ויקרא י׳:ט׳׳ז) – בא לכלל כעס בא לכלל טעות. וכן: בשמעו נא המורים, ויך את הסלע (במדבר כ׳: י׳–י׳׳א) – על ידי כעס טעה.
Rashi: (11th century France)
Moshe's Anger led him to err, and he forgot the laws of purifying gentile utensils. [This explains why Elazar had to transmit this teaching in Moshe's stead.] We find a similar phenomenon on the eighth day of the Tabernacle's inauguration, regarding which the verse states about Moshe, "He was furious with Elazar and Itamar" (Lev. 10:16). In addition, because Moshe got angry, he made a mistake [which Aaron then corrected]. And again, when Moshe lost his temper and declared, "Listen now, rebels! Shall we produce water for you from this rock?" (20:11), it was because he got angry that he erred [and struck the stone instead of speaking to it].
אבן עזרא:
כי חוקת תורה הפרה לאלעזר נתנה (במדבר י׳׳ט:ג׳), ומשה אמר להם כלל: תתחטאו (במדבר ל׳׳א: י׳׳ט–כ׳), ואלעזר פירש להם.
Ibn Ezra: (12th century Spain)
The ritual of the red cow had been entrusted to Elazar (19:3). As such, although Moshe gave the people the general instruction to purify themselves, it was Elazar who explained to the nation what to do.
טור:
ויאמר אלעזר הכהן אל אנשי הצבא – משה אמר פרשת טהרה אל שרי האלפים והמאות אבל אלעזר שאמר דין טהרת הכלים אמר אל אנשי הצבא ששללו ובזזו מכלי התשמיש הנמצאים בבתים אבל שרי האלפים לא לקחו אלא בגדים חשובים.
Tur: (13th/14th century Spain & France, Yaakov ben Asher)
Moshe taught the laws of purification to the officers of the thousands and of the hundreds, but Elazar spoke directly to the soldiers regarding the utensils. It was the soldiers who plundered the household vessels from the Midianite homes, whereas the officers merely took illustrious clothing for themselves.
ר׳ עובדיה ספורנו:
מה שאמר לכם משה שתחטאו שלישי ושביעי (פסוק י׳׳ט) הוא דין ׳׳חקת התורה׳׳ של פרה אדומה לטהר מטומאת מת.
Rabbi Ovadya Sforno: (16th century Italy)
Elazar told the nation: The instruction that Moshe gave to purify yourselves on the third and seventh days is what is known as "the Law's decree." It is the ritual of the red cow that is required upon contact with a human corpse.
הואיל משה:
לזקני העם היה מבאר משה הדברים יותר ממה שהיה כותב בספר, כי בפרשת חקת לא כתב מאומה על כלי מתכות שצריכים לבוא באש כדי לטהרם, וגם לא הגיד לנו שם שצריך להעביר במים דבר שלא יבוא באש, רק שצריך להזות עליו, וכאן שבאה הלכה למעשה, בא אלעזר הכהן הגדול שעליו להשגיח על טהרת העם למען לא יטמאו המקדש, וביאר לחם תוכן הענין.
Ho'il Moshe: (19th century Italy, Moise Tedeschi)
Moshe explained to the nation's elders far more than what is printed in the text. For Parshat Hukat says nothing about purifying metal utensils by passing them through fire. Nor does that text explain that objects which are flammable should be put in water instead. That earlier passage only describes the sprinkling of water. However, since the present text deals with the practical application of the law, Elazar the High Priest now teaches the nation the particulars of these processes. It was his responsibility to ensure that the people remained pure and did not impurify the Tabernacle.
Questions to consider:
- In what ways is Rashi's explanation different from the others?
- In what way are the explanations of Ibn Ezra and Sforno similar? In what way are they different?
- In what way are the explanations of Tur and Ho'il Moshe similar? In what ways are they different?
- The concern of the rabbis that others might "show Moshe up" is invoked to explain the deaths of Nadav and Avihu (Lev. 10) and is present in the story regarding Pinchas. Here too, the commentaries above were clearly concerned about it. Why do you think that it is such a concern? Can you imagine situations in which a great scholar would want a student to decide halakha even in the presence of the teacher?
