When people sincerely desire to come back to God, they are held back by numerous hindrances, such as confused thinking, weakness or inability to remedy those matters pertaining to relations between man and his neighbor. Admittedly, these hindrances constitute a very serious barrier requiring the complete mastery and conquest of man's feelings in the face of the supreme duty devolving on him to mend his ways. Nevertheless, since the desire to repent is so strong, such first glimmerings of teshuva must be accepted as constituting a purifying and refining factor... This holds good for the individual and the public as a whole. The glimmerings of teshuva do exist in Israel. The arousing of the will of the nation as a while to return to its homeland, to its own essence, spirit and personality contains something of the genuine light of repentance. The situation is clearly pictured for us int he way the Torah expresses itself on the subject: And thou shalt return toward the Lord thy God"; "If thou returnest unto the Lord". The teshuva referred to is, at the outset, of an inner nature (not immediately perceptible), covered up by many intervening layers- but no power on earth can prevent the Light from On High from illuminating us... and ultimately we achieve the teshuva which brings healing and redemption to the world. (we graduate from teshuva ad Hashem to the teshuva el Hashem)
The common denominator between Torah and teshuvah is the act of personal transformation, the ultimate creative act. To be engaged in Torah study is not just to read what rabbis are telling you, but to kind of transform and interpret and find yourself and your own story and your own narrative and your own ideas within the text of Torah, to be able to append your own experience and ideas into the larger canon of Torah.
And that obviously doesn’t just include the written Torah, but it includes the entire canon through all the generations, and find a way, and almost like append your letter through your own experience into the world of Torah. And it is that creative act that the ultimate creative act, the ultimate act of transformation, the ultimate act of creativity in Judaism is actually the act of teshuvah. It is the creative interpretation of self. If Torah is a creative reading, where you take yourself and you read it into the Torah, you find ways through your own logic, interpretation, and you find through the act of Talmud Torah, a place where you and your experiences can reside and be interpreted. The act of teshuvah is an act of interpretation and reinterpretation of self. It is a creative reading of your own life and your own experiences.
And all her paths, peaceful.
(ב) זֹאת חֻקַּת הַתּוֹרָה. (תהלים יב, ז): אִמְרוֹת ה׳ אֲמָרוֹת טְהֹרוֹת, אָמַר רַבִּי . רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ דְּסִכְנִין בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי לֵוִי אָמַר תִּינוֹקוֹת שֶׁהָיוּ בִּימֵי דָוִד עַד שֶׁלֹא טָעֲמוּ טַעַם חֵטְא הָיוּ יוֹדְעִין לִדְרשׁ אֶת הַתּוֹרָה מ"ט פָּנִים טָמֵא וּמ"ט פָּנִים טָהוֹר, וְהָיָה דָוִד מִתְפַּלֵּל עֲלֵיהֶם וְאוֹמֵר (תהלים יב, ח): אַתָּה ה׳ תִּשְׁמְרֵם, נְטַר אוֹרָיְיתְהוֹן בְּלִבְּהוֹן, (תהלים יב, ח): [תנצרם] תִּצְּרֶנּוּ מִן הַדּוֹר זוּ לְעוֹלָם. וְאַחַר כָּל הַשֶּׁבַח הַזֶּה יוֹצְאִין לַמִּלְחָמָה וְנוֹפְלִין, עַל יְדֵי שֶׁהָיָה בָּהֶם דֵּילָטוֹרִין, הוּא שֶׁדָּוִד אָמַר (תהלים נז, ה): נַפְשִׁי בְּתוֹךְ לְבָאִם אֶשְׁכְּבָה לֹהֲטִים, נַפְשִׁי בְּתוֹךְ לְבָאִם, זֶה אַבְנֵר וַעֲמָשָׂא שֶׁהָיוּ לְבָאִים בַּת
(2)...Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin said in the name of Rabbi Levi: Children who were in the era of David, before they experienced the taste of sin they were able to expound the Torah forty-nine aspects impure and forty-nine aspects pure.6This expression means that they could analyze a question and give forty-nine reasons to explain why something should be considered pure and forty-nine reasons to explain why it should be considered impure. David would pray for them and say: “You, Lord, preserve them” (Psalms 12:8) – keep their Torah in their heart. “Keep them secure, from this generation, forever” (Psalms 12:8).
After all this praise, they would go out to war and fall, because there were slanderers in their midst. That is what David said: “Amid lions, I lie among the eager, [men whose teeth are spears and arrows, whose tongues are a honed sword]” (Psalms 57:5). “Amid lions” – this is Avner and Amasa, who were lions in Torah. “I lie among the eager” – these are Do’eg and Aḥitofel, who were eager for slander. “Whose tongues are a honed sword” – these are the Zifites, as it is stated: “When the Zifites came and said to Saul [is not David hiding in our midst?]” (Psalms 54:2). At that moment David said: “Rise above the heavens, God” (Psalms 57:6) – remove Your Divine Presence from their midst.
But the generation of Ahab were all idolaters, but because there were no slanderers in their midst they would go out to war and prevail. This is what Ovadya said to Elijah: “Was it not told to my lord what I did when Jezebel killed the prophets of the Lord? I concealed [the Lord’s prophets…and I provided them with bread and water” (I Kings 18:13) – if bread, why water? Rather, it teaches that it was more difficult to bring the water than the bread.7This is a parenthetical clause. – But Elijah proclaims on Mount Carmel: “I alone remain a prophet of the Lord” (I Kings 18:22), and the entire people knows but do not reveal it to the king.
Dr. Muschel and Dr. Galla
Based on my research and the research of other shame researchers, I believe that there is a profound difference between shame and guilt. I believe that guilt is adaptive and helpful—it’s holding something we’ve done or failed to do up against our values and feeling psychological discomfort.
I define shame as the intensely painful feeling or experience of believing that we are flawed and therefore unworthy of love and belonging—something we’ve experienced, done, or failed to do makes us unworthy of connection.
I don’t believe shame is helpful or productive. In fact, I think shame is much more likely to be the source of destructive, hurtful behavior than the solution or cure. I think the fear of disconnection can make us dangerous.
I believe the differences between shame and guilt are critical in informing everything from the way we parent and engage in relationships, to the way we give feedback at work and school.
... one of the big differences between shame and guilt, it has to do with what people are then motivated to do. And it turns out that we all fail and transgress at certain times. Times when people feel shame about their failures or transgressions, they’re inclined to become defensive, to deny, to blame other people, to not really take responsibility and sometimes to get angry at other people for making them feel that way. But what they don’t necessarily do is change their behavior. They don’t own it, because it’s so painful to think “I’m a horrible person” and own that. When people feel guilt about something they’ve really done and just focus on, I feel bad that I did that, then they’re more inclined to—well, first of all, a behavior’s easier to change than a self. People are pressed not to hide and escape and deny. When people feel guilt about specific behavior, they’re inclined to want to confess, apologize, make things right.