Naso

(1) “Take a census of the sons of Gershon as well, by their patrilineal house, by their families” (Numbers 4:22).
“Take a census of the sons of Gershon,” that is what is written: “It is more precious than pearls, and all the objects of your desire do not equal it” (Proverbs 3:15). We learned there, a Sage takes precedence over a king of Israel: If a Sage dies, we have no one like him; if a king of Israel dies, all of Israel is fit for kingship. A king takes precedence over a High Priest, as it is stated: “The king said to them: Take with you the servants of your lord, [mount Solomon my son upon my mule, and take him down to Giḥon. Tzadok the priest and Natan the prophet shall anoint him there as king over Israel]” (I Kings 1:33–34).1The verse refers to the king as the lord of Tzadok, the High Priest. A High Priest takes precedence over a prophet, as it is stated: “Tzadok the priest and Natan the prophet shall anoint him there as king over Israel” (I Kings 1:34); Tzadok is before Natan.2Tosefta Horayot 2:8. Rabbi Huna said in the name of Rabbi Ḥanina: A prophet folds his arms and legs and sits before the priest, what is the source? It is written: “Hear now, Yehoshua the High Priest, [you and your colleagues who sit before you]” (Zechariah 3:8). Could it be that they were lay people? The verse states: “As they are men of distinction [mofet]” (Zechariah 3:8), and mofet is nothing other than prophecy, as it is stated: “And he will provide you with a sign or a wonder [mofet]” (Deuteronomy 13:2). A High Priest who was anointed with anointing oil takes precedence over one who was appointed with multiple vestments.3A High Priest could be appointed in two ways. He could be anointed with anointing oil, or he could enter his position by wearing the vestments of the High Priest. Since the High Priest has eight vestments and a regular priest has four vestments, the High Priest appointed by means of wearing the eight vestments is called "the High Priest of multiple vestments." A prophet takes precedence over the priest anointed for war. The priest anointed for war takes precedence over the deputy of the High Priest. The deputy takes precedence over the head of the priestly watch. The head of the priestly watch takes precedence over the head of the patrilineal house. The head of the patrilineal house takes precedence over the overseer. The overseer takes precedence over the treasurer. The treasurer takes precedence over the common priest. The common priest takes precedence over the Levite. The Levite takes precedence over the Israelite. The Israelite takes precedence over the mamzer, the mamzer over the Givonite, the Givonite over the proselyte, the proselyte over the liberated slave. When? It is when they are all equal. However, if the mamzer is a Torah scholar, he takes precedence over a High Priest who is an ignoramus, as it is stated: “It is more precious than pearls.”4Tosefta, Horayot 2:8. They thought to say: To redeem, to sustain, and to clothe [he takes precedence], but for seating, no. Rabbi Avin said: Even for seating. What is the source? “It is more precious than pearls [mipeninim]” – even than the one who enters the innermost sanctum [lifnai velifnim].
Another matter, “it is more precious than pearls,” it is speaking of Kehat and Gershon. Even though Gershon is the firstborn, and we have found everywhere that the verse has accorded honor to the firstborn, because Kehat bore the Ark inside, which was the Torah, the verse gave him precedence over Gershon, as first it said: “Take a census of the sons of Kehat” (Numbers 4:2) and then it says: “Take a census of the sons of Gershon…” (Numbers 4:22). That is, “it is more precious than pearls [mipeninim],” than the firstborn who emerged first. Peninim is nothing other than first, just as it says: “This was formerly [lefanim] in Israel” (Ruth 4:7).

(2) “Take a census of…,” that is what is written: “He will not withdraw His eyes from the righteous…” (Job 36:7). The Holy One blessed be He does not withhold from them the realization of their ideal, as we found that Jacob coveted the birthright for the sake of Heaven, so he would be able to sacrifice. He purchased it from Esau with money and the Holy One blessed be He agreed with him, and He called him: “My son, My firstborn” (Exodus 4:22). He granted greatness to the firstborn so they would sacrifice before Him. That is, “He will not withdraw His eyes [einav] from the righteous” (Job 36:7). [Another explanation:] “Einav” is nothing other than in his place [taḥtav], just as it says: “And, behold, the mark maintained its appearance [be’einav]” (Leviticus 13:5). What is taḥtav? These are his children, just as it says: “In the wake of [taḥat] your fathers, your sons will be” (Psalms 45:17).
“And kings upon the throne” (Job 36:7), as the Holy One blessed be He accorded honor to the firstborn, and it was fitting for them to take the kingdom, as it is stated: “But the kingdom he gave to Yehoram, because he was the firstborn” (II Chronicles 21:3). Likewise, regarding David it says: “As for Me, I will make him My firstborn, supreme over kings of the earth” (Psalms 89:28). That is, “and kings upon the throne.”
“He has seated them forever” (Job 36:7), as they [the Israelite firstborns] would have been fit to take the priesthood and what the Levites perform, had they not sinned in the act of the calf. Initially, the firstborn would sacrifice, as it is stated: “He sent the young men of the children of Israel and they offered up burnt offerings [and they slaughtered feast-offerings of bulls to the Lord]” (Exodus 24:5).
Likewise, Jacob said to Reuben: “Reuben, you are my firstborn…[greater in honor [se’et] and greater in power [az]]” (Genesis 49:3). Se’et, this is priesthood, just as it says: “Aaron raised his hands [vayisa] toward the people, and blessed them” (Leviticus 9:22). Az, this is kingdom, as it is stated: “He will give strength [oz] to His king” (I Samuel 2:10). Had Reuben not sinned in the act of Bilha, he would have been worthy to take priesthood and kingdom, because he was the firstborn..
From where is it derived that they were worthy for the service of the Levites? It is as you find that the common Levites entered in place of the firstborn of Israel, as it is stated: “You shall take the Levites for Me, I am the Lord, in place of all the firstborn among the children of Israel” (Numbers 3:41). That is, “he has seated them forever [lanetzach].” This is the status of the Levites that the firstborn were worthy to take, just as it says: “The Levites were counted from thirty years old and above…of these…” (I Chronicles 23:3–4). “To supervise [lenatzeach] the labor of the House of the Lord” (Ezra 3:8). Regarding the tribe of Levi, the verse said: “My eyes are on the faithful of the land; they will dwell [lashevet] with me” (Psalms 101:6). That is “He has seated them [vayoshivem] forever.”
“They were exalted” (Job 36:7). Who caused the firstborn to lose this honor? It is because they exalted themselves and worshipped before the calf. Therefore, “if there are those bound in shackles [bezikim]” (Job 36:8), they were prohibited from sacrificing an item that is done in fire.5"An item that is done in fire" refers to a sacrifice. Zikim is nothing other than fire, as it is stated: “Behold, all of you are igniters of fire, [lighters of sparks] [zikot]” (Isaiah 50:11). [“Or trapped in the pangs of poverty” (Job 36:8)], that each and every one of them is obligated to redeem himself with five silver shekels and give them to the Levites.
We find regarding the firstborn of Israel that they descended from their prominence because of the act of the calf. But the firstborn of the Levites, who did not err regarding the calf, the priesthood was given to Aaron, who was the firstborn, and the rest of the firstborn Levites required neither redemption nor atonement, and merited Levite status with their brethren.
Were a person to whisper to you: ‘Was Gershon not firstborn? Why did the verse give precedence to Kehat in taking a census, and only then counted Gershon?’ You, too, say to him: ‘Because [the family of] Kehat were the bearers of the Ark, which is of the most sacred order, and Aaron the priest, who was of the most sacred order, emerged from him, while Gershon was sacred. That is why the verse gave Kehat precedence.
From where do you derive that Gershon did not lose his prominence because he was firstborn? It is as you find just as it is stated regarding Kehat: “Take a census of the sons of Kehat” (Numbers 4:2), so, it is stated regarding Gershon: “Take a census of the sons of Gershon [as well]” (Numbers 4:22). What is it that the verse stated: “As well”? It is so you will not say that it is for this that he counted the sons of Gershon second, because they are inferior to the sons of Kehat. No, rather, “as well” is written; that the sons of Gershon, too, were the equivalent of the sons of Kehat, but the verse gave them precedence here in deference to the Torah. But in other places, it gave precedence to Gershon over Kehat.

(3) “By their patrilineal house, by their families,” by patrilineal house, he determined families for him, but not by their matrilineal house. Were the sons of Gershon to marry from among the daughters of Kehat or the daughters of Merari, their sons would be attributed to the families of Gershon. However, were the rest of the families to marry from the daughters of Gershon, their sons would be attributed to the rest of the families.
“From thirty years old and above until fifty years old you shall count them: Everyone enlisted to perform a duty, to perform service in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:23).
“From thirty years old and above.” It is taught: A High Priest enters the courtyard for service only if he is anointed for seven [days] and donned multiple vestments for seven [days]. Even if he was not anointed for seven and did not don multiple garments for seven, his service is valid.
A common priest enters the courtyard for service only if he brought one-tenth of an ephah of his own and offers it with his own hand. Even though he did not bring one-tenth of an ephah of his own and offer it with his own hand, his service is valid.
The son of a Levite enters the courtyard only if he studied for five years, as it is stated: “This is regarding the Levites: From twenty-five years old and above [he shall enlist to perform duty in the work of the Tent of Meeting]” (Numbers 8:24), and elsewhere it is stated: “From thirty years old and above.” (Numbers 4:3) If it is stated “from twenty-five years old,” why is “from thirty years old” stated? If it is stated “from thirty years old,” why is “from twenty-five years old” stated? Rather, all those years between twenty-five years old until thirty years old, he would study. From then on, they draw him near to service. From here they said: Anyone who does not see a modicum of success in his studies within five years, will never see [success]. Rabbi Yosei says: Three years, as it is stated: “To raise them for three years” (Daniel 1:5).
One seats an elder in the Chamber of Hewn Stone only if he became a judge in his city. Once he became a judge in his city, they promote and seat him on the Temple Mount. From there, they promote and seat him on the chail.rampart.6The rampart is a section of the Temple Mount which is before the Women's Courtyard. See the Tosefta, Chagiga 2:4, which refers to a beit din on the Temple Mount, in the rampart, and in the Chamber of Hewn Stone. From there, they promote and seat him in the Chamber of Hewn Stone.
“Everyone enlisted to perform a duty,” they were gatekeepers. “To perform service in the Tent of Meeting,” they were singers.
“This is the service of the Gershonite families, to perform service and for bearing” (Numbers 4:24).
“This is the service of the Gershonite families,” and no other; it teaches that it was prohibited for the sons of Gershon to enter into the service of the sons of Merari, in the beams of the Tabernacle, its bars, its pillars, and its sockets. “To perform service and for bearing” – when they would construct the Tabernacle, they would spread the woven strips of fabric in the Tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting. Everything that was in their charge, they would construct. When they dismantled the Tabernacle, they would load it onto the wagons.
“They shall bear the woven strips of fabric of the Tabernacle, and the Tent of Meeting, its covering, and the taḥash covering that is upon it from above, and the screen for the entrance of the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:25).
“And the taḥash covering that is upon it from above,” in its plain sense. Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: Rabbi Meir would say: The taḥash that existed in the days of Moses was a creature unto itself, and the Sages in that generation did not know whether it was a type of beast [chaya] or a type of animal [behema].7Among kosher animals, there are two distinct groups: cattle, referred to as behemot, and animals that are not normally domesticated, referred to as chayot. There are certain halakhik distinctions between them. The Sages did not know which category the tahash belonged to. It had a single horn on its forehead, and it was made available to Moses for that occasion. The Tabernacle was crafted of it, and it was hidden. From the fact that it says: It had one horn on its forehead, we learn from this that it was pure.8Shabbat 28b. “And the screen for the entrance of the Tent of Meeting,” just as it says: “You shall craft a screen for the entrance [of the Tent]” (Exodus 26:36).
“And the hangings of the courtyard, and the screen for the entrance of the gate of the courtyard that is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar, all around, and their cords, and all the instruments of their service, and everything that shall be crafted for them, and they shall serve” (Numbers 4:26).
“And the hangings of the courtyard,” these are the hangings that they positioned around the courtyard, just as it says: “You shall make the courtyard…likewise, on the north side…the width of the courtyard…fifteen cubits of hangings…and on the second side…” (Exodus 27:9, 11–12, 14–15).
“And the screen for the entrance of the gate,” just as it says: “For the gate of the courtyard [a screen]…” (Exodus 27:16).
“That is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar, all around.” It is taught: The altar of the burnt offering, its length is five cubits, its width is five cubits, and its height is three cubits, as it is stated: “You shall craft the altar […five cubits length and five cubits width, the altar shall be square, and three cubits its height]” (Exodus 27:1). “[And he crafted] the altar of the burnt offering…[its length was five cubits and its width five cubits square and its height was three cubits]” (Exodus 38:1), this is the statement of Rabbi Meir.9Rabbi Meir's position is that the verses giving the measurements of the altar should be understood literally. Rabbi Yosei said to him: From the fact that it is stated: “Five cubits length and five cubits width,” do I not know that it is square? Why does the verse state: “Shall be square”? Rather, it is stated in order to derive a verbal analogy from it. Here “square” is stated and elsewhere10Regarding the golden altar (Exodus 30:3). “square” is stated. Just as “square” stated elsewhere, its height is twice its width, here, too, its height is twice its width. Rabbi Meir said to him: ‘If as you say, the result is that the altar is five cubits higher than the courtyard hangings.’11The altar is ten cubits high while the courtyard hangings are five cubits high (see Exodus 27:18). Rabbi Yosei said to him: ‘But is it not already stated: “And the hangings of the courtyard, [and the screen for the entrance of the gate of the courtyard that is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar]”? (Numbers 4:26). Just as the Tabernacle is ten cubits, so the altar is ten cubits.’12The phrase: “That is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar” is extraneous. It juxtaposes the Tabernacle and the altar to teach us that just like the height of the Tabernacle was ten cubits, the height of the altar was also ten cubits.
“And their cords,” these cords, what would they do with them? They would fold the strips of fabric and the hangings, they would tie them with the cords, and they would place them in the wagons.
“And all the instruments of their service,” these are the golden hooks and the bronze hooks with which they would attach the strips of fabric.
“And everything that shall be crafted for them, and they shall serve.” Everything that was done for all the vessels, the sons of Gershon would tend to them.
“According to the directive of Aaron and his sons shall be all the service of the sons of the Gershonites, for all their burden, and for all their service; you shall assign them all their burden as a commission” (Numbers 4:27).
“According to the directive of Aaron and his sons shall be,” this is what they said, that the Holy One blessed be He accorded honor to the firstborn. Just as the service of the sons of Kehat was according to the directive of Aaron and his sons, just as it says: “Aaron and his sons shall come, and assign them, each man…” (Numbers 4:19), so, too, the service of the sons of Gershon was according to the directive of Aaron and his sons. But with regards to the sons of Merari, it is not written: “According to the directive of Aaron and his sons.”
“You shall assign them all their burden as a commission.” The verse includes Moses with them, so they13Moses, Aaron and his children. would command them [the Gershonites] to keep watch over everything that they [the Gershonites] bore.
“This is the service of the families of the sons of the Gershonites in the Tent of Meeting, and their commission is under the direction of Itamar son of Aaron the priest” (Numbers 4:28).
“This is the service of the families of the sons of the Gershonites…” Initially, Aaron and his sons and Moses with them assigned the sons of Gershon regarding their service, their burden, and their commission. From here on, their service and their commission is under the direction of Itamar son of Aaron the priest.

(2) “A man or woman...” – that is what is written: “The Lord loves the righteous. [The Lord protects proselytes]” (Psalms 146:8–9). This is what the Holy One blessed be He said: “I love those who love Me” (Proverbs 8:17); likewise He says: “For I will honor those who honor Me” (I Samuel 2:30) – they love Me, and I too love them. Why does the Holy One blessed be He love the righteous? It is because it is not an inheritance and it is not familial. You find that the priests are a patrilineal house; the Levites are a patrilineal house, as it is stated: “The house of Aaron, bless the Lord; the house of Levi, bless the Lord” (Psalms 135:19–20). If a person seeks to become a priest, he cannot; to be a Levite, he cannot. Why? It is because his father was neither a priest nor a Levite. However, if a person seeks to become righteous, even if he is a gentile, he can, as it is not a patrilineal house. That is why it says: “Those who fear the Lord, bless the Lord” (Psalms 135:20). “The house of those who fear the Lord” is not stated, but rather: “Those who fear the Lord.” They are not a patrilineal house, but of their own initiative they volunteered and loved the Holy One blessed be He. That is why the Holy One blessed be He loves them. That is why it is stated: “The Lord loves the righteous…”
The Holy One blessed be He loves the proselytes very much. To what is the matter comparable? It is to a king who had a flock, and it would go out to the field, and in the evening it would enter. So it was every day. One time, a certain gazelle entered with the flock. It went to the goats and was grazing with them. The flock entered the pen; it entered with them. They went out to graze; it went out with them. They said to the king: ‘This gazelle is accompanying the flock and is grazing with them. Each and every day, it goes out with them and enters with them.’ The king loved it. When it would go out to the field, he would command that it be given good pasture as it would want. ‘No person shall strike it; be careful with it.’ When it would enter with the flock, as well, he would say, ‘give it to drink.’ He loved it very much. They said to him: ‘My master, how many goats, you have, how many sheep you have, how many kids you have, and you do not admonish us; but regarding this gazelle you admonish us each and every day?’ The king told them, ‘The flock, whether it wants to or not, it is accustomed to graze in the field all day, and in the evening to come and sleep in the pen. The gazelles sleep in the wilderness; they are not accustomed to enter settlements inhabited by people. Shall we not appreciate one that forsook the great and broad wilderness, the habitat of all the beasts, and came and settled in the courtyard?’
So, do we not need to appreciate the proselyte, who forsook his family and his patrilineal house and forsook his nation and all the nations of the world, and came to be with us? That is why He increases their protection, as He cautioned Israel to restrain themselves and not harm them. As it says: “You shall love the proselyte” (Deuteronomy 10:19); “You shall not mistreat a proselyte, [and you shall not oppress him]” (Exodus 22:20). Just as the Torah obligated one who robbed from another [to give] a monetary payment and an offering of a ram of atonement, it also obligated one who robbed a proselyte to pay him his money and to bring a ram offering, as it is written: “Speak to the children of Israel: A man or woman,” and this portion speaks of one who robs a proselyte. As it is written: “The Lord protects proselytes” (Psalms 146:9). He increased their protection so they would not return to their evil ways.
Proselytes are beloved, as the verse everywhere likens them to Israel, as it is stated: “But it is you, Israel, My servant, Jacob, [whom I have chosen, descendants of Abraham,6“Descendants of Abraham” is interpreted here as referring to proselytes. who loved me]” (Isaiah 41:8). Love is stated regarding Israel, as it is stated: “I have loved you, said the Lord” (Malachi 1:2), and love is stated regarding proselytes, as it is stated: “And loves the proselyte, to give him food and garment” (Deuteronomy 10:18). Israel are called slaves, as it is stated: “For to Me the children of Israel are slaves” (Leviticus 25:55); proselytes are called slaves, as it is stated: “[I am the Lord your God, who took you out of the land of Egypt] from being slaves to them” (Leviticus 26:13).7Israel were strangers [gerim] in Egypt, and just as God chose them, He chooses the proselytes [gerim]. Acceptance is stated regarding Israel, as it is stated: “It shall be on his forehead always, for acceptance [for them before the Lord]” (Exodus 28:38), and acceptance is stated regarding proselytes, as it is stated: “Their burnt-offerings and their peace-offerings shall be for acceptance on My altar…” (Isaiah 56:7). Service is stated regarding Israel, as it is stated: “And you will be called priests of the Lord; [it will be said of you: Servants of our God]” (Isaiah 61:6); and service is stated regarding proselytes, as it is stated: “Also the aliens who accompany [the Lord to serve Him]” (Isaiah 56:6). Protection is stated regarding Israel, as it is stated: “The Lord is your protector” (Psalms 121:5), and protection is stated regarding proselytes, as it is stated: “The Lord protects proselytes” (Psalms 146:9).
Likewise you find regarding the four groups that stand before the Omnipresent. It is stated: “This one will say: I am the Lord’s…” (Isaiah 44:5). “This one will say: I am the Lord’s” – he is totally devoted to the Omnipresent, and he is untainted by sin. “That one will call himself by the name of Jacob” (Isaiah 44:5) – these are the righteous proselytes. “This one will write with his hand: To the Lord” (Isaiah 44:5) – these are the penitents. “And will call himself by the name of Israel” (Isaiah 44:5) – these are those who fear Heaven. We have learned that the proselytes are like Israel. That is why this portion, “A man or woman…,” is stated.