פרק האומר חזרה

Review from the beginning of the פרק until the גמ׳ וכן האומר on דף נט with רש״י and תוס׳
Some additional points and material for review
-In regards to תוס׳ ד״ה האומר we also saw the ר״ן and the רשב״א which offer two alternative פשטים as to what the חידוש of the first case of the משנה is
- What is the nature of that which he did wrong that we call him a רמאי ? The גמ׳ has a הו״א that one would not be considered a רמאי in the case of חבירו because the one who sent him does not necessarily rely on him. Our משנה teaches us that even in the case of חבירו you are deemed a רמאי, is that because at the end of the day you do rely on him or is that because to be considered a רמאי it is not about being relied upon?
what can be inferred from תוס׳ ד״ה לקדושי ? see the מהרש״ל in the beginning of the פרק
- When do we call someone a רמאי and when do we call someone a רשע ?
see the עצמות יוסף
- תוס׳ ד״ה עני see the רש״ש ותוס׳ הרי״ד for how רש״י can possibly answer the questions of תוס׳