הסדרה בהלכה - בראשית ל - ירידה מארץ ישראל

וַיַּ֣רְא יַעֲקֹ֔ב כִּ֥י יֶשׁ־שֶׁ֖בֶר בְּמִצְרָ֑יִם וַיֹּ֤אמֶר יַעֲקֹב֙ לְבָנָ֔יו לָ֖מָּה תִּתְרָאֽוּ׃ וַיֹּ֕אמֶר הִנֵּ֣ה שָׁמַ֔עְתִּי כִּ֥י יֶשׁ־שֶׁ֖בֶר בְּמִצְרָ֑יִם רְדוּ־שָׁ֙מָּה֙ וְשִׁבְרוּ־לָ֣נוּ מִשָּׁ֔ם וְנִחְיֶ֖ה וְלֹ֥א נָמֽוּת׃ וַיֵּרְד֥וּ אֲחֵֽי־יוֹסֵ֖ף עֲשָׂרָ֑ה לִשְׁבֹּ֥ר בָּ֖ר מִמִּצְרָֽיִם׃

Genesis 42:1-3

When Jacob saw that there were food rations to be had in Egypt, he said to his sons, “Why do you keep looking at one another? Now I hear,” he went on, “that there are rations to be had in Egypt. Go down and procure rations for us there, that we may live and not die.” So ten of Joseph’s brothers went down to get grain rations in Egypt;

תוספתא עבודה זרה ה׳:ב׳

ישרה אדם בארץ ישראל אפילו בעיר שרובה עובדי כוכבים ולא בחו"ל אפי' בעיר שכולה ישראל מלמד שישיבת ארץ ישראל שקולה כנגד כל מצות שבתורה. והקבור בארץ ישראל כאילו הוא קבור תחת המזבח. לא יצא אדם לחוצה לארץ אא"כ היו חטין סאתים בסלע אמר רבי שמעון במה דברים אמורין בזמן שאינו מוצא ליקח אבל בזמן שמוצא ליקח אפילו סאה בסלע לא יצא וכן היה ר"ש אומר אלימלך מגדולי הדור ומפרנסי צבור היה ועל שיצא לחוצה לארץ מת הוא ובניו ברעב והיו כל ישראל קיימין על אדמתן שנאמר (רות א) ותהום כל העיר עליהן מלמד שכל העיר קיימת ומת הוא ובניו ברעב. הרי הוא אומר (בראשית כח) ושבתי בשלום אל בית אבי שאין ת"ל והיה ה' לי לאלקים ואומר (ויקרא כה) לתת לכם את ארץ כנען להיות לכם לאלקים כל זמן שאתם בארץ כנען הריני לכם אלוק אין אתם בארץ כנען איני לכם לאלוק וכן הוא אומר (יהושע ד׳:י״ג) כארבעים אלף חלוצי הצבא ואומר (יהושוע ב) כי נתן בידי את יושבי הארץ וגו' וכי עלתה על דעתך שישראל מכבשים את הארץ לפני המקום אלא כל זמן שהם עליה כולה נכבשה אינן עליה כולה אינה נכבשת וכן דוד אמר (שמואל א כו) כי גרשוני היום מהסתפח בנחלת ה' וגו' וכי תעלה על דעתך שדוד המלך עובד עבודת כוכבים אלא שהיה דוד דורש ואומר כל המניח את ארץ ישראל בשעת שלום ויוצא כאילו עובד עבודת כוכבים דכתיב (ירמיהו לב) ונטעתים בארץ הזאת באמת אינן עליה אין נטועין לפני באמת לא בכל לבי ולא בכל נפשי. ר' שמעון בן אלעזר אומר ישראל שבחוצה לארץ עובדי עבודת כוכבים בטהרה הן כיצד עובד כוכבים שעשה משתה לבנו והלך וזימן את כל היהודים שבעירו אע"פ שהן אוכלין משלהן ושותין משלהן ושמש שלהן עומד ע"ג עובדי עבודת כוכבים הן שנא' (שמות לד) וקרא לך ואכלת מזבחו.

Tosefta Avodah Zarah 5:2

2. It is proper for a person to live in Eretz Yisrael even in a city where most [of the inhabitants] are idolators and not outside Eretz Yisrael even in a city where everyone is Jewish. This teaches that living in Eretz Yisrael is equal to all the mitzvot in the Torah. And the one buried in Eretz Yisrael, it is as if he is buried under the altar [in the Temple]. A person should not go outside of Eretz Yisrael unless wheat is two se’ahs for a sela. Rabbi Shimon said, under what circumstances? In a time when can find [wheat] to purchase even a se’ah for a sela, he does not go out. And so Rabbi Shimon said, Elimelekh was among the great ones of his generation and among the ones who sustained the public. And because he went outside Eretz Yisrael, he and his sons died in a famine. But all of Israel was able to survive on their land as it says, “The whole city buzzed over them” (Ruth 1:19). This teaches that all the city survives when he and his sons died in famine. Indeed it says, “And I return in peace to my father’s house” (Gen 28:21), and the scripture does not say, “Then the Lord will be my God” (Gen 28:21). And it says, “[I am the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt] to give to you the land of Canaan and to be to you God” (Lev 25:38). For all the time you are in the land of Canaan, indeed I am your god. If you are not in the land of Canaan, I am not your god. And thus it says, “About forty thousand shock troops [went across at the instance of the Lord, to the steppes of Jericho for battle]” (Josh 4:13). And it says, “[See, the Lord your God is with you, and He will give you rest on every side,] for He delivered the inhabitants of the land into my hand [so that the land lies conquered before the Lord and His people” (I Chron 22:18). Would it come up in your mind that Israel would subdue the land before ha-maqom? Rather: all the time that they are on it, it is [as if it is] subdued. If they are not on it, it is [as if it is] not subdued. And thus David said, “For they have driven me out today so that I cannot have a share in the Lord’s possession” (I Sam 26:19). Would it come up in your mind that David the king worshipped idols? Rather David interpreted and said, whoever leaves Eretz Yisrael behind in a time of peace and goes out it is as if he worshipped idols, as it says, “I will plant them faithfully in this land” (Jer 32:41). If they are not upon it, they are not planted before me in faith “with all my heart and all my soul” (Jer 32:41). Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says, A Jew that is outside the land is an idol worshipper in purity. Howso? An idolator who made a banquet for his son and invited all the Jews in his town, even though they eat their own [food] and drink their own [drinks] and their server stands over them, even still they worship idolatry as it says, “And invite you and you will eat of their sacrifices” (Ex 34:15).

מסכת שמחות ד׳:כ״ה-כ״ו

מטמא כהן ויוצא ח"ל לדיני ממונות ולדיני נפשות לקדש את החדש ולעבר את השנה ולהציל את שדהו מנכרי ואפילו יוצא ועורר עליה: ללמד תורה ולישא אשה רבי יהודה אומר אם אין לו מאין ללמד יטמא [ואם לאו אל יטמא ר"י אומר אע"פ (שאין) [שיש] לו מאין ללמוד יטמא] שלא מכל אדם זכאי ללמוד בתורה מעשה ביוסי הבבלי שנטמא ויצא חוץ לארץ אצל רבי יוסי בציידין:

Tractate Semachot 4:25-26

A kohen may defile himself by going outside the land [of Israel] for the purpose of [dealing with a non-Jewish Court in] a civil suit or a capital charge, to announce the new moon or intercalate the year, or to rescue his field from a non-Jew, even if he only goes to protest [against his taking possession of it]. [He may go outside the land of Israel] to study Torah or to take a wife. R. Judah said: If he has nowhere else to study he may so defile himself, otherwise he may not. R. Jose said: Even though he has elsewhere to study he may defile himself, because no one is so meritorious as to be able to learn Torah from any man. It is related of Jose the Babylonian that he defiled himself by going outside the land [of Israel to study Torah] with R. Jose in Zidon.

תלמוד ירושלמי ברכות ג׳:א׳:י״ח

תַּנִּי מִטָּמֵּא כֹּהֵן וְיוֹצֵא חוּצָה לָאָרֶץ לְדִינֵי מְמוֹנוֹת וּלְדִינֵי נְפָשׁוֹת וּלְקִידּוּשׁ הַחוֹדֶשׁ וּלְעִיבּוּר שָׁנָה. לְהַצִּיל שָׂדֶה מִן הַגּוֹי וְאֲפִילוּ ליטור יוֹצֵא וְעוֹרֵר עָלֶיהָ. לִלְמוֹד תּוֹרָה וְלִישָּׂא אִשָּׁה. רִבִּי יוּדָה אוֹמֵר אִם יֵשּׁ לוֹ מֵאֵיכַן לִלְמוֹד אַל יִטָּמֵא. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר אֲפִילוּ יֵשּׁ לוֹ מֵאֵיכַן לִלְמוֹד תּוֹרָה יִטָּמֵא שֶׁלֹּא מִכָּל־אָדָם זוֹכֶה לִלְמוֹד. אָֽמְרוּ עָלָיו עַל יוֹסֵף הַכֹּהֵן שֶׁהָיָה מִטָּמֵּא וְיוֹצֵא אַחַר רַבּוֹ לְצִידָן. אֲבָל אָֽמְרוּ אַל יֵצֵא כֹּהֵן לְחוּץ לָאָרֶץ אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן הִבְטִיחוּ לוֹ אִשָּׁה.

Jerusalem Talmud Berakhot 3:1:18

It is stated: A Cohen may defile himself by leaving the Land for civil and criminal suits, for the consecration of the New Moon and intercalation of a year, to save a field from a Gentile, and he even may leave and lodge a complaint about it, to study Torah and to marry a wife. Rebbi Judah says, if he has a place to study, he should not defile himself. Rebbi Yose says, even if he has a place to study, he may defile himself, since a man may not have the luck to learn from every teacher. They said about Joseph the Cohen that he defiled himself and followed his teacher to Sidon. In truth, they said a priest should not go abroad unless one promised him a wife.

תוספתא מועד קטן (ליברמן) א׳:י״ב

(פ"ב בכי"ע) לוקחין מן הגוים שדות, בתים, וכרמים, בהמה, עבדים ושפחות, מפני שהוא כמציל מידם, וכותב ומעלה בערכאים, ואם היה כהן, מיטמא להן ולא עוד אלא לדון עליהן, בחוצה לארץ. וכשם שמיטמא בחוצה לארץ, כך מיטמא בבית הקברו'. ומיטמא לתלמוד תורה, ומיטמא לישא אשה, ר' יהודה אומ' אם יש שם מי שילמוד הרי זה לא יטמא, ואם לאו, הרי זה יטמא, ר' יוסה אומ' אע"פ שיש שם ממי שילמד, הרי זה מיטמא, שאין מכל אדם זוכה ללמוד, אלא ממי שזוכה לו.

Tosefta Moed Katan (Lieberman) 1:12

...

תלמוד ירושלמי מועד קטן ג׳:א׳:ב׳-ג׳

משנה: וְאֵילּוּ מְגַלְּחִין בַּמּוֹעֵד הַבָּא מִמְּדִינַת הַיָּם וּמִבֵּית הַשִּׁבְיָה וְהַיּוֹצֵא מִבֵּית הָאֲסוֹרִים וּמְנוּדֶּה שֶׁהִתִּירוּ לוֹ חֲכָמִים. וְכֵן מִי שֶׁנִּשְׁאַל לֶחָכָם וְהוּתַּר וְהַנָּזִיר וְהַמְּצוֹרָע מִטּוּמְאָתוֹ לְטַהֲרָתוֹ׃ הלכה: אֵילּוּ מְגַלְּחִין בַּמּוֹעֵד הַבָּא מִמְּדִינַת הַיָּם וּמִבֵּית הַשִּׁבְייָה וְהַיּוֹצֵא מִבֵּית הָאֲסוּרִין. הָא שְׁאַר כָּל־בְּנֵי אָדָם אֲסוּרִין. אָמַר רִבִּי סִימוֹן. גָּ‍ֽזְרוּ עֲלֵיהֶן שֶׁלָּא יִיכָּֽנְסוּ לָרֶגֶל מְנוּוָלִין. תַּמָּן תַּנִּינָן. אַנְשֵׁי מִשְׁמָר וְאַנְשֵׁי מַעֲמָד אֲסוּרִין מִלְּסַפֵּר וּמִלְּכַבֵּס. וּבַחֲמִישִׁי מוּתָּרִין מִפְּנֵי כְבוֹד הַשַּׁבָּת׃ הָא שְׁאָר כָּל־הַיָּמִים אֲסוּרִין. רִבִּי יוֹסֵה רִבִּי אַבָּהוּ בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן רִבִּי אָבוּן בְּשֵׁם חִזְקִיָּה. גָּֽזְרוּ עֲלֵיהֶן שֶׁלָּא יִיכָּֽנְסוּ לְשַׁבָּתָן מְנוּוָלִין. תַּנֵּי בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי יוּדָה. הַבָּא מִמְּדִינַת הַיָּם אָסוּר לוֹ לְגַלֵּחַ. רִבִּי יוּדָה כְּדַעְתֵּיהּ. דְּרִבִּי יוּדָה אָמַר. אָסוּר לְפָרֵשׂ לַיָּם הַגָּדוֹל. מֵעַתָּה כֹּהֵן שֶׁיָּצָא חוּץ לָאָרֶץ הוֹאִיל וְיָצָא שֶׁלֹּא בִרְצוֹן חֲכָמִים יְהֵא אָסוּר לוֹ לְגַלֵּחַ. חַד כֹּהֵן אֲתַא לְגַבֵּי רִבִּי חֲנִינָה. אָמַר לֵיהּ. מָהוּ לָצֵאת לְצוֹר לַעֲשׂוֹת דְּבַר מִצְוָה לַחְלוֹץ אוֹ לְייַבֵּם. אָמַר לֵיהּ. אָחִיו שֶׁלְאוֹתוֹ הָאִישׁ יָצָא. בָּרוּךְ הַמָּקוֹם שֶׁנְּגָפוֹ. וְאַתְּ מְבַקֵּשׁ לַעֲשׂוֹת כְּיוֹצֵא בוֹ. אִית דְּבָעֵי מֵימַר. הָכֵין אָמַר לֵיהּ. אָחִיו שֶׁלְאוֹתוֹ הָאִישׁ הִנִּיחַ חֵיק אִמּוֹ וְחִיבֵּק חֵיק נָכְרִיָּה. וּבָרוּךְ שֶׁנְּגָפוֹ. וְאַתְּ מְבַקֵּשׁ לַעֲשׂוֹת כְּיוֹצֵא בוֹ. שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר בָּא אֲתַא לְגַבֵּי רִבִּי חֲנִינָה. אָמַר לֵיהּ. כְּתוּב לִי חָדָא אִיגְרָא דְּאִיקָר נֵיפּוּק לְפַרְנָסָתִי לְאַרְעָא בָּרְייָתָא. אָמַר לוֹ. לְמָחָר אֲנִי הוֹלֵךְ אֶצֶל אֲבוֹתֶיךָ. יְהוּ אוֹמְרִים לִי. נְטִיעָה אַחַת שֶׁלְחֶמְדָּה שֶׁהָֽיִתָה לָנוּ בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל הִיתַּרְתָּה לָהּ לָצֵאת לְחוּץ לָאָרֶץ.

Jerusalem Talmud Moed Katan 3:1:2-3

HALAKHAH: “And the following shave on the holiday: He who comes from overseas, or from being kidnapped, or leaves jail.” Therefore all other people are forbidden? Rebbi Simon said, they decreed about them so they should not enter the holiday badly groomed. There, we have stated: “The people of the watch and those of the bystanders are forbidden to shave and to wash their garments, but on Thursday they are permitted because of the honor of the Sabbath.” Therefore on all other days they are forbidden? Rebbi Yose, Rebbi Abbahu in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan; Rebbi Abun, <rebbi yasa> in the name of Ḥizqiah: They decreed about them so they should not enter their week badly groomed. It was stated in the name of Rebbi Jehudah: Shaving is forbidden to someone who comes from overseas. Rebbi Jehudah follows his own opinion since Rebbi Jehudah said, it is forbidden to sail on the ocean. Then a Cohen who left for outside the Land and left against the will of the Sages should be forbidden to shave. A Cohen came to Rebbi Ḥanina. He said to him, may one leave for Tyre for as religious obligation, to give ḥaliṣah or to enter levirate marriage? He answered him, this man’s brother left; praised be the Omnipresent Who smote him. And you want to do what he did. Some want to say, so he spoke to him: This man’s brother disdained his mother’s bosom and embraced another’s bosom, and you want to do what he did. Simeon bar Abba came to Rebbi Ḥanina and asked him to write a letter of recommendation so he could leave for his sustenance outside the Land. He said to him, tomorrow I shall go to your forefathers; they would say to me, one desirable plant we had in the Land of Israel and you permitted it to leave the Land.

מועד קטן י״ד א:י״א-ט״ו

הַבָּא מִמְּדִינַת הַיָּם — לֹא יְגַלֵּחַ, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁיָּצָא שֶׁלֹּא בִּרְשׁוּת. אָמַר רָבָא: לָשׁוּט — דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל אָסוּר, לִמְזוֹנוֹת — דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל מוּתָּר, לֹא נֶחְלְקוּ אֶלָּא לְהֶרְוֵיחָא. מָר מְדַמֵּי לֵיהּ כְּלָשׁוּט, וּמָר מְדַמֵּי לֵיהּ כְּלִמְזוֹנוֹת. מֵיתִיבִי, אָמַר רַבִּי: נִרְאִין דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוּדָה כְּשֶׁיָּצָא שֶׁלֹּא בִּרְשׁוּת, וְדִבְרֵי חֲכָמִים כְּשֶׁיָּצָא בִּרְשׁוּת. מַאי שֶׁלֹּא בִּרְשׁוּת? אִילֵּימָא לָשׁוּט — וְהָאָמְרַתְּ דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל אָסוּר! וְאֶלָּא לִמְזוֹנוֹת — וְהָאָמְרַתְּ דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל מוּתָּר! אֶלָּא פְּשִׁיטָא, לְהֶרְוֵיחָא. אֵימָא סֵיפָא: נִרְאִין דְּבָרַי חֲכָמִים כְּשֶׁיָּצָא בִּרְשׁוּת, מַאי בִּרְשׁוּת? אִילֵּימָא לִמְזוֹנוֹת — הָא אָמְרַתְּ דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל מוּתָּר! וְאֶלָּא לְהֶרְוֵיחָא — וְהָא אָמְרַתְּ נִרְאִין דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בְּהָא! הָכִי קָאָמַר: נִרְאִין דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְרַבָּנַן כְּשֶׁיָּצָא שֶׁלֹּא בִּרְשׁוּת, וּמַאי נִיהוּ — לָשׁוּט, שֶׁאֲפִילּוּ חֲכָמִים לֹא נֶחְלְקוּ עָלָיו אֶלָּא לְהֶרְוֵיחָא, אֲבָל לָשׁוּט — מוֹדוּ לֵיהּ. וְנִרְאִין דִּבְרֵי רַבָּנַן לְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה כְּשֶׁיָּצָא בִּרְשׁוּת, וּמַאי נִיהוּ — לִמְזוֹנוֹת, שֶׁאֲפִילּוּ רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לֹא נֶחְלַק עֲלֵיהֶם אֶלָּא לְהֶרְוֵיחָא, אֲבָל לִמְזוֹנוֹת — מוֹדֶה לְהוּ.

Moed Katan 14a:11-15

§ The mishna taught: One who comes from a country overseas on the intermediate days of a Festival is permitted to cut his hair. The Gemara comments: The mishna is not in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, as it is taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yehuda says: One who comes from a country overseas on the intermediate days of a Festival must not shave or cut his hair, due to the fact that he left his home without permission. The Gemara continues to explain the definition and parameters of leaving without permission. Rava said: If one left Eretz Yisrael to travel, all agree that it is prohibited for him to shave during the intermediate days of the Festival because he left on his own initiative, and this is not considered an unavoidable circumstance. If he left for basic sustenance, i.e., due to financial difficulty, all agree that it is permitted for him to shave upon his return because he is regarded as having left due to circumstances beyond his control. They disagree only with regard to the case where he left to earn greater profit, i.e., he had enough to live on in Eretz Yisrael, but he left in order to increase his income. One Sage, Rabbi Yehuda, compares him to one who left to travel, and the other Sage, the Rabbis of the mishna, compare him to one who left for basic sustenance. The Gemara raises an objection from the following baraita: Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said: The statement of Rabbi Yehuda seems more reasonable in a case when he left without permission, and the statement of the Rabbis seems more reasonable when one left with permission. The Gemara clarifies: What is meant by without permission? If we say that it means that he left to travel, didn’t you say that in this case all agree that it is prohibited for him to cut his hair upon his return? Rather, say that it means that he left for basic sustenance. But didn’t you say that all agree that it is permitted for him to cut his hair in such a case? Rather, it is obvious that it means that he left in search of greater profit. Say the latter clause of the baraita as follows: The statement of the Rabbis seems more reasonable in a case when one left with permission. The Gemara clarifies: What is meant by with permission? If we say that he left for basic sustenance, didn’t you say that all agree that it is permitted for him to cut his hair upon his return? Rather, say that it means that he left for greater profit. But didn’t you say in the first clause that the statement of Rabbi Yehuda seems more reasonable in this case? Therefore, according to Rava’s distinctions, there is an internal contradiction within the baraita. The Gemara resolves the difficulty: This is what Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi is saying: The statement of Rabbi Yehuda seems more reasonable to the Rabbis in the case where one left without permission. And what is meant by without permission? It means a case where one left to travel, as even the Rabbis disagree with Rabbi Yehuda only when one left for greater profit, but when one left to travel they agree with Rabbi Yehuda that it is prohibited for one to shave and cut his hair. And the statement of the Rabbis seems more convincing to Rabbi Yehuda in the case where one left with permission. And what is meant by with permission? It is a case where one left for basic sustenance, as even Rabbi Yehuda disagrees with the Rabbis only when one left for greater profit, but when he left for basic sustenance Rabbi Yehuda concedes to them that it is permitted for him to shave and cut his hair. Therefore, Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi’s intent was not to decide between the opinions of the Rabbis and Rabbi Yehuda but to clarify their dispute.

קידושין ל״א ב:ו׳-ט׳

רַב יוֹסֵף כִּי הֲוָה שָׁמַע קָל כַּרְעָא דְאִמֵּיהּ, אָמַר: אֵיקוּם מִקַּמֵּי שְׁכִינָה דְּאָתְיָא. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: אַשְׁרֵי מִי שֶׁלֹּא חֲמָאָן. רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן כִּי עִבְּרַתּוּ אִמּוֹ – מֵת אָבִיו, יְלָדַתּוּ – מֵתָה אִמּוֹ. וְכֵן אַבָּיֵי. אִינִי? וְהָאָמַר אַבָּיֵי: אֲמַרָה לִי אֵם! הָהִיא מְרַבְּיָנְתֵּיהּ הֲוַאי. רַב אַסִּי הֲוָה לֵיהּ הָהִיא אִמָּא זְקֵינָה. אֲמַרָה לֵיהּ: בָּעֲיָנָא תַּכְשִׁיטִין. עֲבַד לַהּ. בָּעֲיָנָא גַּבְרָא: נְיעַיֵּין לָךְ. בָּעֲיָנָא גַּבְרָא דְּשַׁפִּיר כְּוָתָךְ, שַׁבְקַהּ וַאֲזַל לְאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל. שְׁמַע דְּקָא אָזְלָה אַבָּתְרֵיהּ. אֲתָא לְקַמֵּיהּ דְּרַבִּי יוֹחָנָן, אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מַהוּ לָצֵאת מֵאֶרֶץ לְחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אָסוּר. לִקְרַאת אִמָּא מַהוּ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אֵינִי יוֹדֵעַ. אִתָּרַח פּוּרְתָּא, הֲדַר אֲתָא. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אַסִּי, נִתְרַצֵּיתָ לָצֵאת – הַמָּקוֹם יַחֲזִירְךָ לְשָׁלוֹם. אֲתָא לְקַמֵּיהּ דְּרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, דִּלְמָא מִירְתָּח רָתַח? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מַאי אֲמַר לָךְ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הַמָּקוֹם יַחֲזִירְךָ לְשָׁלוֹם. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: וְאִם אִיתָא דְּרָתַח – לָא הֲוָה מְבָרֵךְ לֵךְ. אַדְּהָכִי וְהָכִי שְׁמַע לַאֲרוֹנַאּ דְּקָאָתֵי. אָמַר: אִי יְדַעִי לָא נְפַקִי.

Kiddushin 31b:6-9

When Rav Yosef heard his mother’s footsteps, he would say: I will stand before the arriving Divine Presence. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Fortunate is one who never saw his father and mother, as it is so difficult to honor them appropriately. The Gemara relates that Rabbi Yoḥanan himself never saw his parents. When his mother was pregnant with him, his father died; and when she gave birth to him, his mother died. And the same is true of Abaye. The Gemara asks: Is that so, that Abaye never saw his mother? But didn’t Abaye say on many occasions: My mother told me? The Gemara answers: That mother was actually his foster mother, not his birth mother. Rav Asi had an elderly mother. She said to him: I want jewelry, and he made jewelry for her. She said to him: I want a man whom I can marry, and he said to her: I will seek one for you. She said to him: I want a husband who is as handsome as you. At this point, he realized that she was senile, and that he would be unable to fulfill all her requests. Therefore, he left her and went to Eretz Yisrael. Rav Asi heard that she was following him to Eretz Yisrael. He came before Rabbi Yoḥanan and said to him: What is the halakha with regard to leaving Eretz Yisrael to go outside of Eretz Yisrael? Rabbi Yoḥanan said to him: It is prohibited. Rav Asi further asked: If one is going to greet his mother, what is the halakha? Rabbi Yoḥanan said to him: I do not know. Rav Asi waited a little while, and then came back to him. Rabbi Yoḥanan said to him: Asi, you are evidently determined to leave. May the Omnipresent return you in peace, and he said no more. Rav Asi came before Rabbi Elazar, because he did not know how to interpret Rabbi Yoḥanan’s statement. He said to Rabbi Elazar: God forbid, perhaps he is angry with me that I wished to leave? Rabbi Elazar said to him: What exactly did he say to you? Rav Asi said to him: May the Omnipresent return you in peace. Rabbi Elazar said to him: If it is so that he was angry, he would not have blessed you. Rabbi Yoḥanan certainly gave you permission to leave. In the meantime, while he was traveling to meet her, Rav Asi heard that her coffin was coming, i.e., his mother had died and her coffin was being brought to Eretz Yisrael. He said: Had I known I would not have left, as after his mother’s death he was not obligated to leave Eretz Yisrael to honor her.

בבא בתרא צ״א א:ז׳-י״ג

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין יוֹצְאִין מֵאָרֶץ לְחוּץ לָאָרֶץ, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן עָמְדוּ סָאתַיִם בְּסֶלַע. אָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן: אֵימָתַי – בִּזְמַן שֶׁאֵינוֹ מוֹצֵא לִיקַּח, אֲבָל בִּזְמַן שֶׁמּוֹצֵא לִיקַּח – אֲפִילּוּ עָמְדָה סְאָה בְּסֶלַע, לֹא יֵצֵא. וְכֵן הָיָה רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַאי אוֹמֵר: אֱלִימֶלֶךְ, מַחְלוֹן וְכִלְיוֹן, גְּדוֹלֵי הַדּוֹר הָיוּ, וּפַרְנְסֵי הַדּוֹר הָיוּ; וּמִפְּנֵי מָה נֶעְנְשׁוּ? מִפְּנֵי שֶׁיָּצְאוּ מֵאָרֶץ לְחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וַתֵּהֹם כׇּל הָעִיר עֲלֵיהֶן, וַתֹּאמַרְנָה הֲזֹאת נׇעֳמִי״. מַאי ״הֲזֹאת נָעֳמִי״? אָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק, אָמְרוּ: חֲזִיתֶם נָעֳמִי שֶׁיָּצָאת מֵאָרֶץ לְחוּץ לָאָרֶץ – מָה עָלְתָה לָהּ? וְאָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק: אוֹתוֹ הַיּוֹם שֶׁבָּאת רוּת הַמּוֹאֲבִיָּה לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, מֵתָה אִשְׁתּוֹ שֶׁל בֹּעַז. וְהַיְינוּ דְּאָמְרִי אִינָשֵׁי: עַד דְּלָא שָׁכֵיב שִׁיכְבָא – קָיְימָא מְנוּ בַיְיתֵיהּ. אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר רַב הוּנָא אָמַר רַב: אִבְצָן זֶה בֹּעַז. מַאי קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן? כִּי אִידַּךְ דְּרַבָּה בַּר רַב הוּנָא – דְּאָמַר רַבָּה בַּר רַב הוּנָא אָמַר רַב: מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים מִשְׁתָּאוֹת עָשָׂה בֹּעַז לְבָנָיו, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וַיְהִי לוֹ שְׁלֹשִׁים בָּנִים, וּשְׁלֹשִׁים בָּנוֹת שִׁלַּח הַחוּצָה, וּשְׁלֹשִׁים בָּנוֹת הֵבִיא לְבָנָיו מִן הַחוּץ, וַיִּשְׁפֹּט אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁבַע שָׁנִים״. וּבְכׇל אַחַת וְאַחַת עָשָׂה שְׁנֵי מִשְׁתָּאוֹת – אֶחָד בְּבֵית אָבִיו, וְאֶחָד בְּבֵית חָמִיו; וּבְכוּלָּן לֹא זִימֵּן אֶת מָנוֹחַ – אָמַר: כּוּדָנָא עֲקָרָה, בְּמַאי פָּרְעָא לִי? תָּאנָא: וְכוּלָּן מֵתוּ בְּחַיָּיו. וְהַיְינוּ דְּאָמְרִי אִינָשֵׁי: ״בְּחַיִּיךְ דִּילַדְתְּ שִׁיתִּין שִׁיתִּין – לְמָה לִיךְ? אִיכְּפַל, וְאוֹלִיד חַד דְּמִשִּׁיתִּין זָרִיז. (סִימָן: מָלַךְ, אַבְרָהָם, עֶשֶׂר שָׁנִים, שֶׁנִּפְטַר, נִתְנַשֵּׂא לְבַדּוֹ.) אָמַר רַב חָנָן בַּר רָבָא אָמַר רַב: אֱלִימֶלֶךְ, וְשַׂלְמוֹן, וּפְלוֹנִי אַלְמוֹנִי, וַאֲבִי נָעֳמִי – כּוּלָּן בְּנֵי נַחְשׁוֹן בֶּן עַמִּינָדָב הֵן. מַאי קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן? שֶׁאֲפִילּוּ מִי שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ זְכוּת אָבוֹת, אֵינָהּ עוֹמֶדֶת לוֹ בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁיּוֹצֵא מֵאָרֶץ לְחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ.

Bava Batra 91a:7-13

The Sages taught: One may not leave Eretz Yisrael to live outside of Eretz Yisrael unless the price of two se’a of grain stood at a sela, which is double its usual price. Rabbi Shimon said: When does this exception, permitting one to leave Eretz Yisrael under certain circumstances, apply? It applies when one is unable to find produce to buy, as he has no money. But when one has money and is able to find produce to buy, even if the price of a se’a of grain stood at a sela, he may not leave. And Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai would likewise say: Elimelech and his sons Mahlon and Chilion were prominent members of their generation and were leaders of their generation. And for what reason were they punished? They were punished because they left Eretz Yisrael to go outside of Eretz Yisrael, as it is stated concerning Naomi and Ruth: “And all the city was astir concerning them, and the women said: Is this Naomi?” (Ruth 1:19). The Gemara asks: What is the meaning of the phrase: “Is this Naomi”? How does this indicate that her husband and sons were punished for leaving Eretz Yisrael? Rabbi Yitzḥak says that the women said: Have you seen what befell Naomi, who left Eretz Yisrael for outside of Eretz Yisrael? Not only did she not escape tribulations there, but she lost her status entirely. And Rabbi Yitzḥak also says with regard to this passage: That very day when Ruth the Moabite came to Eretz Yisrael, the wife of Boaz died, i.e., from the moment of their arrival the possibility was created for Ruth’s eventual marriage to Boaz. This explains the adage that people say: Before the deceased dies, the person who will next be in charge of his house arises, as in this case Boaz’s new wife, Ruth, arrived as his previous wife died. Apropos the story of Ruth the Gemara adds: Rabba bar Rav Huna says that Rav says: The judge Ibzan of Bethlehem (see Judges 12:8–10) is Boaz. The Gemara asks: What is he teaching us? The Gemara explains that this comment is in accordance with the other statement of Rabba bar Rav Huna, as Rabba bar Rav Huna says that Rav says: Boaz prepared one hundred and twenty feasts for his children at their weddings. As it is stated, concerning Ibzan: “And he had thirty sons, and thirty daughters he sent abroad, and thirty daughters he brought in from abroad for his sons. And he judged Israel seven years” (Judges 12:9). The verse indicates that he had sixty children. And at each and every wedding he prepared for his children, he made two feasts, one in the house of the father of the groom and one in the house of the father-in-law of the groom. And he did not invite Manoah, the future father of Samson, whose wife was barren (see Judges 13:2) to any of them, as he said: It is not worth inviting him; he is a sterile mule, how will he pay me back? Manoah will never invite me in return, as he has no children. A Sage taught: And all of the children of Ibzan died during his lifetime. And this explains the adage that people say: Why do you need the sixty, the sixty children that you beget during your lifetime? Go to the trouble and beget one who will be more diligent than sixty. This adage refers to Boaz, who had sixty children who died, and yet his last child, born from Ruth, is his glory, as King David was born from this line. The Gemara provides a mnemonic for the ensuing statements that Rav Ḥanan bar Rava said that Rav said: Melech; Abraham; ten years; when he died; and He alone was exalted. Rav Ḥanan bar Rava says that Rav says: With regard to Elimelech, and Boaz’s father, Salmon, and So-and-so, the unnamed relative who was a closer relative to Elimelech than Boaz (Ruth 4:1), and Naomi’s father, all of these are descendants of Nahshon, son of Amminadab, the head of the tribe of Judah (see Ruth 4:20–21 and Numbers 2:3). The Gemara asks: What is he teaching us by this statement? He is teaching that even in the case of one who has the merit of his ancestors to protect him, this merit does not stand for him when he leaves Eretz Yisrael to go outside of Eretz Yisrael, as Elimelech died on account of this sin.

כתובות ק״י ב:ז׳-קי״א ב:א׳

מַתְנִי׳ הַכֹּל מַעֲלִין לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, וְאֵין הַכֹּל מוֹצִיאִין. הַכֹּל מַעֲלִין לִירוּשָׁלַיִם, וְאֵין הַכֹּל מוֹצִיאִין. אֶחָד הָאֲנָשִׁים וְאֶחָד הַנָּשִׁים. נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל וְגֵרְשָׁהּ בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל — נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל. נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל וְגֵרְשָׁהּ בְּקַפּוֹטְקְיָא — נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל. נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה בְּקַפּוֹטְקְיָא וְגֵרְשָׁהּ בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל — נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל. רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר: נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת קַפּוֹטְקְיָא. נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה בְּקַפּוֹטְקְיָא וְגֵרְשָׁהּ בְּקַפּוֹטְקְיָא — נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת קַפּוֹטְקְיָא. גְּמָ׳ ״הַכֹּל מַעֲלִין״ לְאֵתוֹיֵי מַאי? לְאֵתוֹיֵי עֲבָדִים. וּלְמַאן דְּתָנֵי עֲבָדִים בְּהֶדְיָא, לְאֵתוֹיֵי מַאי? לְאֵתוֹיֵי מִנָּוֶה הַיָּפֶה לְנָוֶה הָרַע(ה). ״וְאֵין הַכֹּל מוֹצִיאִין״ לְאֵתוֹיֵי מַאי? לְאֵתוֹיֵי עֶבֶד שֶׁבָּרַח מֵחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ לָאָרֶץ, דְּאָמְרִינַן לֵיהּ: זַבְּנֵיהּ הָכָא וְזִיל, מִשּׁוּם יְשִׁיבַת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל. ״הַכֹּל מַעֲלִין לִירוּשָׁלַיִם״ לְאֵתוֹיֵי מַאי? לְאֵתוֹיֵי מִנָּוֶה הַיָּפֶה לְנָוֶה הָרַע(ה). ״וְאֵין הַכֹּל מוֹצִיאִין״ לְאֵתוֹיֵי מַאי? לְאֵתוֹיֵי אֲפִילּוּ מִנָּוֶה הָרַע(ה) לְנָוֶה הַיָּפֶה. וְאַיְּידֵי דִּתְנָא רֵישָׁא ״אֵין מוֹצִיאִין״, תְּנָא סֵיפָא נָמֵי ״אֵין מוֹצִיאִין״. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הוּא אוֹמֵר לַעֲלוֹת, וְהִיא אוֹמֶרֶת שֶׁלֹּא לַעֲלוֹת — כּוֹפִין אוֹתָהּ לַעֲלוֹת, וְאִם לָאו — תֵּצֵא בְּלֹא כְּתוּבָּה. הִיא אוֹמֶרֶת לַעֲלוֹת, וְהוּא אוֹמֵר שֶׁלֹּא לַעֲלוֹת — כּוֹפִין אוֹתוֹ לַעֲלוֹת, וְאִם לָאו — יוֹצִיא וְיִתֵּן כְּתוּבָּה. הִיא אוֹמֶרֶת לָצֵאת, וְהוּא אוֹמֵר שֶׁלֹּא לָצֵאת — כּוֹפִין אוֹתָהּ שֶׁלֹּא לָצֵאת, וְאִם לָאו — תֵּצֵא בְּלֹא כְּתוּבָּה. הוּא אוֹמֵר לָצֵאת, וְהִיא אוֹמֶרֶת שֶׁלֹּא לָצֵאת — כּוֹפִין אוֹתוֹ שֶׁלֹּא לָצֵאת, וְאִם לָאו — יוֹצִיא וְיִתֵּן כְּתוּבָּה. נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה כּוּ׳. הָא גּוּפַהּ קַשְׁיָא: קָתָנֵי: נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל וְגֵרְשָׁהּ בְּקַפּוֹטְקְיָא, נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל — אַלְמָא בָּתַר שִׁיעְבּוּדָא אָזְלִינַן. אֵימָא סֵיפָא: נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה בְּקַפּוֹטְקְיָא וְגֵרְשָׁהּ בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל — אַלְמָא בָּתַר גּוּבְיָינָא אָזְלִינַן! אָמַר רַבָּה: מִקּוּלֵּי כְתוּבָּה שָׁנוּ כָּאן. קָסָבַר כְּתוּבָּה דְּרַבָּנַן. רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר: נוֹתֵן לָהּ מִמְּעוֹת קַפּוֹטְקְיָא. קָסָבַר כְּתוּבָּה דְּאוֹרָיְיתָא. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הַמּוֹצִיא שְׁטַר חוֹב עַל חֲבֵירוֹ, כָּתוּב בּוֹ בָּבֶל — מַגְבֵּהוּ מִמְּעוֹת בָּבֶל, כָּתוּב בּוֹ אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל — מַגְבֵּהוּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל. כָּתוּב בּוֹ סְתָם, הוֹצִיאוֹ בְּבָבֶל — מַגְבֵּהוּ מִמְּעוֹת בָּבֶל, הוֹצִיאוֹ בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל — מַגְבֵּהוּ מִמְּעוֹת אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל. כָּתוּב בּוֹ כֶּסֶף סְתָם — מַה שֶּׁיִּרְצֶה לֹוֶה מַגְבֵּהוּ. מַה שֶּׁאֵין כֵּן בִּכְתוּבָּה. אַהֵיָיא? אָמַר רַב מְשַׁרְשְׁיָא: אַרֵישָׁא, לְאַפּוֹקֵי מִדְּרַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל, דְּאָמַר כְּתוּבָּה דְּאוֹרָיְיתָא. כָּתוּב בּוֹ כֶּסֶף סְתָם — מַה שֶּׁיִּרְצֶה לֹוֶה מַגְבֵּהוּ. וְאֵימָא נְסָכָא? אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: דִּכְתִיב בֵּיהּ מַטְבֵּעַ. וְאֵימָא פְּרִיטֵי? אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: פְּרִיטֵי דְכַסְפָּא לָא עָבְדִי אִינָשֵׁי. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: לְעוֹלָם יָדוּר אָדָם בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲפִילּוּ בְּעִיר שֶׁרוּבָּהּ גּוֹיִם, וְאַל יָדוּר בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ וַאֲפִילּוּ בְּעִיר שֶׁרוּבָּהּ יִשְׂרָאֵל, שֶׁכׇּל הַדָּר בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל דּוֹמֶה כְּמִי שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ אֱלוֹקַּ, וְכׇל הַדָּר בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ דּוֹמֶה כְּמִי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ אֱלוֹקַּ. שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״לָתֵת לָכֶם אֶת אֶרֶץ כְּנַעַן לִהְיוֹת לָכֶם לֵאלֹהִים״. וְכֹל שֶׁאֵינוֹ דָּר בָּאָרֶץ אֵין לוֹ אֱלוֹקַּ? אֶלָּא לוֹמַר לָךְ: כׇּל הַדָּר בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ כְּאִילּוּ עוֹבֵד עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה. וְכֵן בְּדָוִד הוּא אוֹמֵר: ״כִּי גֵרְשׁוּנִי הַיּוֹם מֵהִסְתַּפֵּחַ בְּנַחֲלַת ה׳ לֵאמֹר לֵךְ עֲבוֹד אֱלֹקִים אֲחֵרִים״, וְכִי מִי אָמַר לוֹ לְדָוִד לֵךְ עֲבוֹד אֱלֹקִים אֲחֵרִים? אֶלָּא לוֹמַר לָךְ: כׇּל הַדָּר בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ — כְּאִילּוּ עוֹבֵד עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה. רַבִּי זֵירָא הֲוָה קָמִשְׁתְּמִיט מִינֵּיהּ דְּרַב יְהוּדָה דִּבְעָא לְמִיסַּק לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, דְּאָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: כׇּל הָעוֹלֶה מִבָּבֶל לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל עוֹבֵר בַּעֲשֵׂה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״בָּבֶלָה יוּבָאוּ וְשָׁמָּה יִהְיוּ עַד יוֹם פׇּקְדִי אוֹתָם נְאֻם ה׳״. וְרַבִּי זֵירָא — הָהוּא בִּכְלֵי שָׁרֵת כְּתִיב. וְרַב יְהוּדָה? כְּתִיב קְרָא אַחֲרִינָא: ״הִשְׁבַּעְתִּי אֶתְכֶם בְּנוֹת יְרוּשָׁלִַים בִּצְבָאוֹת אוֹ בְּאַיְלוֹת הַשָּׂדֶה וְגוֹ׳״. וְרַבִּי זֵירָא — הָהוּא שֶׁלֹּא יַעֲלוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּחוֹמָה. וְרַב יְהוּדָה? ״הִשְׁבַּעְתִּי״ אַחֲרִינָא כְּתִיב. וְרַבִּי זֵירָא — הָהוּא מִיבְּעֵי לֵיהּ לְכִדְרַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא, דְּאָמַר: שָׁלֹשׁ שְׁבוּעוֹת הַלָּלוּ לָמָּה? אַחַת שֶׁלֹּא יַעֲלוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּחוֹמָה, וְאַחַת שֶׁהִשְׁבִּיעַ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁלֹּא יִמְרְדוּ בְּאוּמּוֹת הָעוֹלָם, וְאַחַת שֶׁהִשְׁבִּיעַ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֶת הַגּוֹיִם שֶׁלֹּא יִשְׁתַּעְבְּדוּ בָּהֶן בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל יוֹתֵר מִדַּאי. וְרַב יְהוּדָה — ״אִם תָּעִירוּ וְאִם תְּעוֹרְרוּ״ כְּתִיב. וְרַבִּי זֵירָא — מִיבְּעֵי לֵיהּ לְכִדְרַבִּי לֵוִי, דְּאָמַר: שֵׁשׁ שְׁבוּעוֹת הַלָּלוּ לָמָּה? תְּלָתָא — הָנֵי דַּאֲמַרַן, אִינָךְ: שֶׁלֹּא יְגַלּוּ אֶת הַקֵּץ, וְשֶׁלֹּא יְרַחֲקוּ אֶת הַקֵּץ, וְשֶׁלֹּא יְגַלּוּ הַסּוֹד לַגּוֹיִם. ״בִּצְבָאוֹת אוֹ בְּאַיְלוֹת הַשָּׂדֶה״, אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: אָמַר לָהֶם הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא לְיִשְׂרָאֵל, אִם אַתֶּם מְקַיְּימִין אֶת הַשְּׁבוּעָה — מוּטָב, וְאִם לָאו — אֲנִי מַתִּיר אֶת בְּשַׂרְכֶם כִּצְבָאוֹת וּכְאַיְלוֹת הַשָּׂדֶה. אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: כׇּל הַדָּר בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל שָׁרוּי בְּלֹא עָוֹן, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וּבַל יֹאמַר שָׁכֵן חָלִיתִי הָעָם הַיּוֹשֵׁב בָּהּ נְשׂוּא עָוֹן״. אֲמַר לֵיהּ רָבָא לְרַב אָשֵׁי: אֲנַן בְּסוֹבְלֵי חֳלָאִים מַתְנֵינַן לַהּ. אָמַר רַב עָנָן: כׇּל הַקָּבוּר בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל כְּאִילּוּ קָבוּר תַּחַת הַמִּזְבֵּחַ. כְּתִיב הָכָא: ״מִזְבַּח אֲדָמָה תַּעֲשֶׂה לִּי״, וּכְתִיב הָתָם: ״וְכִפֵּר אַדְמָתוֹ עַמּוֹ״. עוּלָּא הֲוָה רְגִיל דַּהֲוָה סָלֵיק לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, נָח נַפְשֵׁיהּ בְּחוּץ לָאָרֶץ. אֲתוֹ אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ לְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר. אָמַר: אַנְתְּ עוּלָּא, ״עַל אֲדָמָה טְמֵאָה תָּמוּת״. אָמְרוּ לוֹ: אֲרוֹנוֹ בָּא. אָמַר לָהֶם: אֵינוֹ דּוֹמֶה קוֹלַטְתּוֹ מֵחַיִּים לְקוֹלַטְתּוֹ לְאַחַר מִיתָה. הָהוּא גַּבְרָא דִּנְפַלָה לֵיהּ יְבָמָה בֵּי חוֹזָאָה, אֲתָא לְקַמֵּיהּ דְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא, אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מַהוּ לְמֵיחַת וּלְיַבֹּמַהּ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אָחִיו נָשָׂא כּוּתִית וָמֵת — בָּרוּךְ הַמָּקוֹם שֶׁהֲרָגוֹ. וְהוּא יֵרֵד אַחֲרָיו?! אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: כְּשֵׁם שֶׁאָסוּר לָצֵאת מֵאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל לְבָבֶל כָּךְ אָסוּר לָצֵאת מִבָּבֶל לִשְׁאָר אֲרָצוֹת. רַבָּה וְרַב יוֹסֵף דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: אֲפִילּוּ מִפּוּמְבְּדִיתָא לְבֵי כוּבֵּי. הָהוּא דִּנְפַק מִפּוּמְבְּדִיתָא לְבֵי כוּבֵּי, שַׁמְתֵּיהּ רַב יוֹסֵף. הָהוּא דִּנְפַק מִפּוּמְבְּדִיתָא לְאַסְתּוֹנְיָא, שְׁכֵיב. אֲמַר אַבָּיֵי: אִי בָּעֵי הַאי צוּרְבָּא מֵרַבָּנַן, הֲוָה חָיֵי. רַבָּה וְרַב יוֹסֵף דְּאָמְרִי תַּרְוַיְיהוּ: כְּשֵׁרִין שֶׁבְּבָבֶל אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל קוֹלַטְתָּן, כְּשֵׁרִין שֶׁבִּשְׁאָר אֲרָצוֹת בָּבֶל קוֹלַטְתָּן. לְמַאי? אִילֵימָא לְיוּחֲסִין, וְהָאָמַר מָר: כׇּל הָאֲרָצוֹת עִיסָּה לְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, וְאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל עִיסָּה לְבָבֶל! אֶלָּא לְעִנְיַן קְבוּרָה. אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: כׇּל הַדָּר בְּבָבֶל כְּאִילּוּ דָּר בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״הוֹי צִיּוֹן הִמָּלְטִי יוֹשֶׁבֶת בַּת בָּבֶל״. אָמַר אַבָּיֵי, נָקְטִינַן: בָּבֶל לָא חָזְיָא חַבְלֵי דְמָשִׁיחַ. תַּרְגְּמַהּ אַהוּצָל דְּבִנְיָמִין, וְקָרוּ לֵיהּ קַרְנָא דְשֵׁיזָבְתָּא. אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: מֵתִים שֶׁבְּחוּץ לָאָרֶץ אֵינָם חַיִּים, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְנָתַתִּי צְבִי בְּאֶרֶץ חַיִּים״ — אֶרֶץ שֶׁצִּבְיוֹנִי בָּהּ מֵתֶיהָ חַיִּים, שֶׁאֵין צִבְיוֹנִי בָּהּ — אֵין מֵתֶיהָ חַיִּים. מֵתִיב רַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר מֶמֶל: ״יִחְיוּ מֵתֶיךָ נְבֵלָתִי יְקוּמוּן״, מַאי לָאו: ״יִחְיוּ מֵתֶיךָ״ — מֵתִים שֶׁבְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל. ״נְבֵלָתִי יְקוּמוּן״ — מֵתִים שֶׁבְּחוּץ לָאָרֶץ. וּמַאי ״וְנָתַתִּי צְבִי בְּאֶרֶץ חַיִּים״ — אַנְּבוּכַד נֶצַּר הוּא דִּכְתִיב, דְּאָמַר רַחֲמָנָא: מַיְיתֵינָא עֲלַיְיהוּ מַלְכָּא דְּקַלִּיל כִּי טַבְיָא. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: רַבִּי, מִקְרָא אַחֵר אֲנִי דּוֹרֵשׁ: ״נוֹתֵן נְשָׁמָה לָעָם עָלֶיהָ וְרוּחַ לַהוֹלְכִים בָּהּ״. וְאֶלָּא הָכְתִיב ״נְבֵלָתִי יְקוּמוּן״! הָהוּא בִּנְפָלִים הוּא דִּכְתִיב. וְרַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר מֶמֶל, הַאי ״נוֹתֵן נְשָׁמָה לָעָם עָלֶיהָ״ מַאי עָבֵיד לֵיהּ? מִיבְּעֵי לֵיהּ לְכִדְרַבִּי אֲבָהוּ. דְּאָמַר רַבִּי אֲבָהוּ: אֲפִילּוּ שִׁפְחָה כְּנַעֲנִית שֶׁבְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל מוּבְטָח לָהּ שֶׁהִיא בַּת הָעוֹלָם הַבָּא. כְּתִיב הָכָא: ״לָעָם עָלֶיהָ״, וּכְתִיב הָתָם: ״שְׁבוּ לָכֶם פֹּה עִם הַחֲמוֹר״ — עַם הַדּוֹמֶה לַחֲמוֹר. ״וְרוּחַ לַהוֹלְכִים בָּהּ״, אָמַר רַבִּי יִרְמְיָה בַּר אַבָּא אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: כׇּל הַמְהַלֵּךְ אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל מוּבְטָח לוֹ שֶׁהוּא בֶּן הָעוֹלָם הַבָּא. וּלְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר, צַדִּיקִים שֶׁבְּחוּץ לָאָרֶץ אֵינָם חַיִּים?! אָמַר רַבִּי אִילְעָא: עַל יְדֵי גִּלְגּוּל. מַתְקֵיף לַהּ רַבִּי אַבָּא סַלָּא רַבָּא: גִּלְגּוּל לְצַדִּיקִים צַעַר הוּא! אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: מְחִילּוֹת נַעֲשׂוֹת לָהֶם בַּקַּרְקַע. ״וּנְשָׂאתַנִי מִמִּצְרַיִם וּקְבַרְתַּנִי בִּקְבוּרָתָם״, אָמַר קַרְנָא, דְּבָרִים בְּגוֹ: יוֹדֵעַ הָיָה יַעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ שֶׁצַּדִּיק גָּמוּר הָיָה, וְאִם מֵתִים שֶׁבְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ חַיִּים, לָמָה הִטְרִיחַ אֶת בָּנָיו? שֶׁמָּא לֹא יִזְכֶּה לִמְחִילּוֹת. כַּיּוֹצֵא בַּדָּבָר אַתָּה אוֹמֵר: ״וַיַּשְׁבַּע יוֹסֵף אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְגוֹ׳״, אָמַר רַבִּי חֲנִינָא, דְּבָרִים בְּגוֹ: יוֹדֵעַ הָיָה יוֹסֵף בְּעַצְמוֹ שֶׁצַּדִּיק גָּמוּר הָיָה, וְאִם מֵתִים שֶׁבַּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ חַיִּים, לָמָה הִטְרִיחַ אֶת אֶחָיו אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת פַּרְסָה? שֶׁמָּא לֹא יִזְכֶּה לִמְחִילּוֹת. שְׁלַחוּ לֵיהּ אֲחוֹהִי לְרַבָּה: יוֹדֵעַ הָיָה יַעֲקֹב שֶׁצַּדִּיק גָּמוּר הָיָה וְכוּ׳. אִילְפָא מוֹסִיף בָּהּ דְּבָרִים: מַעֲשֶׂה בְּאֶחָד שֶׁהָיָה מִצְטַעֵר עַל אִשָּׁה אַחַת, וּבִיקֵּשׁ לֵירֵד, כֵּיוָן שֶׁשָּׁמַע כָּזֹאת, גִּלְגֵּל בְּעַצְמוֹ עַד יוֹם מוֹתוֹ. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁחָכָם גָּדוֹל אַתָּה, אֵינוֹ דּוֹמֶה לוֹמֵד מֵעַצְמוֹ לַלּוֹמֵד מֵרַבּוֹ. וְאִם תֹּאמַר אֵין לְךָ רַב — יֵשׁ לְךָ רַב, וּמַנּוּ — רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן. וְאִם אֵין אַתָּה עוֹלֶה — הִזָּהֵר בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה דְּבָרִים: אַל תַּרְבֶּה בִּישִׁיבָה — שֶׁיְּשִׁיבָה קָשָׁה לְתַחְתּוֹנִיּוֹת, וְאַל תַּרְבֶּה בַּעֲמִידָה — שֶׁעֲמִידָה קָשָׁה לַלֵּב, וְאַל תַּרְבֶּה בַּהֲלִיכָה — שֶׁהֲלִיכָה קָשָׁה לָעֵינַיִם. אֶלָּא שְׁלִישׁ בִּישִׁיבָה, שְׁלִישׁ בַּעֲמִידָה, שְׁלִישׁ בְּהִילּוּךְ. כׇּל יְשִׁיבָה שֶׁאֵין עִמָּהּ סְמִיכָה — עֲמִידָה נוֹחָה הֵימֶנָּה. עֲמִידָה סָלְקָא דַּעְתָּךְ? וְהָאָמְרַתְּ עֲמִידָה קָשָׁה לַלֵּב! אֶלָּא: יְשִׁיבָה שֶׁאֵין בָּהּ סְמִיכָה — עֲמִידָה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהּ סְמִיכָה נוֹחָה הֵימֶנָּה.

Ketubot 110b:7-111b:1

MISHNA: All may force their family to ascend to Eretz Yisrael, i.e., one may compel his family and household to immigrate to Eretz Yisrael, but all may not remove others from Eretz Yisrael, as one may not coerce one’s family to leave. Likewise, all may force their family to ascend to Jerusalem, and all may not, i.e., no one may, remove them from Jerusalem. Both men and women may force the other spouse to immigrate to Eretz Yisrael or to move to Jerusalem. The mishna lists other halakhic distinctions between various geographic locations: If one married a woman in Eretz Yisrael and divorced her in Eretz Yisrael, and the currency of the sum in the marriage contract was not specified, he gives her the sum of her marriage contract in the currency of Eretz Yisrael. If one married a woman in Eretz Yisrael and divorced her in Cappadocia, where the currency holds greater value, he gives her the currency of Eretz Yisrael. If one married a woman in Cappadocia and divorced her in Eretz Yisrael, he likewise gives her the currency of Eretz Yisrael. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: He gives her the currency of Cappadocia. Everyone agrees that if one married a woman in Cappadocia and divorced her in Cappadocia, he gives her the currency of Cappadocia. GEMARA: The mishna stated: All can force the members of their family to ascend. The Gemara asks: This inclusive phrase serves to include what case? The Gemara answers: It comes to include slaves, i.e., Hebrew slaves as well may be coerced to immigrate to Eretz Yisrael with their master’s family against their will. The Gemara asks: And according to the one whose text of the mishna expressly teaches the case of slaves, this phrase comes to include what case? As stated later in the Gemara, there are some editions of the mishna that state that this halakha applies equally to men, women, and slaves. The Gemara answers: It comes to include one who moves from a pleasant residence to a noxious residence, i.e., one may coerce his family to ascend to Eretz Yisrael even from a good residence abroad to an inferior one in Eretz Yisrael. § The mishna further taught: But all may not remove others. Once again the Gemara asks: This phrase comes to include what case? The Gemara answers: It comes to include a Canaanite slave who ran away from his master and came from outside Eretz Yisrael to Eretz Yisrael, as we say to the master: Sell your slave here, in Eretz Yisrael, and then you may go and return abroad, but you may not take the slave abroad with you, due to the mitzva of settling Eretz Yisrael. § The mishna taught: All may force others to ascend to Jerusalem. The Gemara asks once again: This phrase comes to include what case? The Gemara answers: It comes to include a move from a pleasant residence elsewhere in Eretz Yisrael to a noxious residence in Jerusalem. § The mishna taught: And all may not remove them from Jerusalem. The Gemara asks: This phrase comes to include what case? The Gemara answers: It comes to include even a move from a noxious residence to a pleasant residence. The Gemara adds: And since the tanna of the mishna taught: But one may not remove, in the first clause, he also taught: But one may not remove, in the latter clause, despite the fact that this halakha could have been inferred from the first clause. § The Sages taught: If the husband says that he wishes to ascend, i.e., to immigrate to Eretz Yisrael, and his wife says that she does not wish to ascend, one forces her to ascend. And if she will not do so, as she resists all attempts to force her to make the move, she is divorced without receiving her marriage contract, i.e., she forfeits her rights to the benefits outlined in the marriage contract. If she says that she wishes to ascend to Eretz Yisrael and he says that he does not wish to ascend, one forces him to ascend. And if he does not wish to immigrate, he must divorce her and give her the marriage contract. If she says that she wishes to leave Eretz Yisrael, and he says that he does not wish to leave, one forces her not to leave. And if she does not wish to stay in Eretz Yisrael and resists all attempts to force her to stay, she is divorced without receiving her marriage contract. If he says that he wishes to leave Eretz Yisrael and she says that she does not wish to leave, one forces him not to leave. And if he does not wish to stay in Eretz Yisrael, he must divorce her and give her the marriage contract. § The mishna taught that if one married a woman in Eretz Yisrael and divorced her in Cappadocia, he must pay her the marriage contract in the currency of Eretz Yisrael. The same is true if he married her in Cappadocia and divorced her in Eretz Yisrael. The Gemara asks: This matter itself is difficult, i.e., there is an internal contradiction in the rulings provided by the mishna. The Gemara elaborates: The mishna first teaches that if one married a woman in Eretz Yisrael and divorced her in Cappadocia, he gives her the currency of Eretz Yisrael. Apparently, one follows the customs of the place of the lien, i.e., he pays with the currency of the location of the wedding, where the obligation came into force. Now, say the latter clause of the mishna: If one married a woman in Cappadocia and divorced her in Eretz Yisrael, he likewise gives her currency of Eretz Yisrael. Apparently, one follows the place of the collection of the money. Rabba said: The Sages taught here one of the leniencies that apply to a marriage contract. The leniency is that the husband pays with the less valuable currency of Eretz Yisrael in both cases, whether the wedding or the divorce occurred there. This is because the tanna of this mishna holds that a marriage contract applies by rabbinic law. § The mishna taught that Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says that if one married a woman in Cappadocia and divorced her in Eretz Yisrael, he pays her the marriage contract in the currency of Cappadocia. The Gemara explains that Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel holds that a marriage contract applies by Torah law, which means that its debt must be paid according to its highest possible value. Consequently, one follows the place in which the obligation was formed, which is the halakha for all deeds and contracts, and there is no room for leniency in this matter. § The Sages taught: With regard to one who produces a promissory note against another, if Babylonia is written in it, he pays it with the currency of Babylonia; if Eretz Yisrael is written in it, he pays it with currency of Eretz Yisrael. In a case where it is written without specification as to where the document was written, if he produced it in Babylonia he pays it with the currency of Babylonia and if he produced it in Eretz Yisrael he pays it with currency of Eretz Yisrael. If the note mentions money without specification of what type of coins are to be used, the borrower may pay it with any type of coin he likes, even the smallest denomination available. However, this is not the case with regard to a marriage contract. The Gemara asks: With regard to this last statement, that this is not the case with regard to a marriage contract: To which part of the baraita is this referring? Rav Mesharshiyya said: It is referring back to the first clause, that if the promissory note mentions Babylonia one pays with Babylonian currency. This indicates that one invariably pays based on the place where the document was written. The tanna adds that this principle does not apply to a marriage contract, as one pays based on the place where a marriage contract was written only if this would lead to a leniency, as explained above (Rid). This ruling comes to exclude the opinion of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, who said that that a marriage contract applies by Torah law and must always be paid in the currency of the place in which the obligation was first formed. § The Gemara continues to analyze the baraita, which teaches: If the note mentions money [kesef ] without specification, the borrower may pay it with any type of coin he likes. The Gemara asks: But can’t one say that perhaps the document was not speaking of coins but of silver [kesef ] strips? Rabbi Elazar said: The baraita is referring to a case in which it is written in the document: Coins, although it does not specify which ones. The Gemara further asks: And can’t one say that one may pay off the debt with perutot, a small denomination? Rav Pappa said: People do not ordinarily mint perutot of silver, as they reserve silver for larger denominations. § In relation to the basic point raised by the mishna concerning living in Eretz Yisrael, the Sages taught: A person should always reside in Eretz Yisrael, even in a city that is mostly populated by gentiles, and he should not reside outside of Eretz Yisrael, even in a city that is mostly populated by Jews. The reason is that anyone who resides in Eretz Yisrael is considered as one who has a God, and anyone who resides outside of Eretz Yisrael is considered as one who does not have a God. As it is stated: “To give to you the land of Canaan, to be your God” (Leviticus 25:38). The Gemara expresses surprise: And can it really be said that anyone who resides outside of Eretz Yisrael has no God? Rather, this comes to tell you that anyone who resides outside of Eretz Yisrael is considered as though he is engaged in idol worship. And so it says with regard to David: “For they have driven me out this day that I should not cleave to the inheritance of the Lord, saying: Go, serve other gods” (I Samuel 26:19). But who said to David: Go, serve other gods? Rather, this comes to tell you that anyone who resides outside of Eretz Yisrael is considered as though he is engaged in idol worship. § The Gemara relates: Rabbi Zeira was avoiding being seen by his teacher, Rav Yehuda, as Rabbi Zeira sought to ascend to Eretz Yisrael and his teacher disapproved. As Rav Yehuda said: Anyone who ascends from Babylonia to Eretz Yisrael transgresses a positive mitzva, as it is stated: “They shall be taken to Babylonia and there they shall remain until the day that I recall them, said the Lord” (Jeremiah 27:22). Based on that verse, Rav Yehuda held that since the Babylonian exile was imposed by divine decree, permission to leave Babylonia for Eretz Yisrael could be granted only by God. The Gemara asks: And how does Rabbi Zeira interpret that verse? The Gemara answers that Rabbi Zeira maintains that that verse is written about the Temple service vessels, and it does not refer to the Jewish people, as the previous verse states: “Thus says the Lord of Hosts, the God of Israel, concerning the vessels that remain in the house of the Lord” (Jeremiah 27:21). Consequently, Rabbi Zeira sought to ascend to Eretz Yisrael. The Gemara asks: And how does Rav Yehuda respond to this argument? The verse is clearly referring to the Temple vessels, not to the people. The Gemara answers that another verse is written: “I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, by the gazelles and by the hinds of the field, that you not awaken or stir up love, until it please” (Song of Songs 2:7). Rabbi Yehuda derived from here that no act of redemption should be performed until a time arrives when it pleases God to bring about the redemption. And Rabbi Zeira maintains that the oath mentioned in that verse means that the Jews should not ascend to Eretz Yisrael as a wall, i.e., en masse, whereas individuals may immigrate as they wish. The Gemara asks: And what does Rav Yehuda reply to this? The Gemara answers that this command is derived from another verse in which “I adjure you” (Song of Songs 3:5) is written. The Gemara asks: And how does Rabbi Zeira explain the repetition of this oath in these verses? The Gemara explains: That verse is necessary for that which was taught by Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, who said: Why are these three oaths (Song of Songs 2:7, 3:5, 8:4) needed? One, so that the Jews should not ascend to Eretz Yisrael as a wall, but little by little. And another one, that the Holy One, Blessed be He, adjured the Jews that they should not rebel against the rule of the nations of the world. And the last one is that the Holy One, Blessed be He, adjured the nations of the world that they should not subjugate the Jews excessively. And how does Rav Yehuda respond? It is written: “That you not awaken or stir up love” (Song of Songs 2:7), which serves to amplify and include a prohibition against Jews immigrating to Eretz Yisrael. The Gemara asks: And how does Rabbi Zeira explain the extra emphasis of this phrase? The Gemara explains: He needs this phrase for that which was taught by Rabbi Levi, who said: These six oaths, i.e., the aforementioned three verses containing oaths, each of which contains the phrase “That you not awaken or stir up,” why are they necessary? Three are those that we said and explained above. The other three oaths are as follows: That those who know should not reveal the end of days; and that they should not distance the end of days by saying that it is still distant; and that they should not reveal the secret of the Jews to the nations. § The Gemara discusses a phrase in the verse cited above. “I adjure you, O daughters of Jerusalem, by the gazelles and by the hinds of the field” (Song of Songs 2:7). Rabbi Elazar said: The Holy One, Blessed be He, said to the Jewish people: If you fulfill the oath, it is good, and if not, I will abandon your flesh and all will devour you like the gazelles and like the hinds of the field. Rabbi Elazar said: Anyone who resides in Eretz Yisrael dwells without transgression, as it is stated: “And the inhabitant shall not say: I am sick; the people that dwell there shall be forgiven their iniquity” (Isaiah 33:24). Rava said to Rav Ashi: We learned this promise with regard to those who suffer from sickness. The phrase “I am sick” indicates that they are the ones who are forgiven their sins. Rav Anan said: Anyone who is buried in Eretz Yisrael is considered as though he is buried beneath the altar. It is stated here: “An altar of earth [adama] you shall make for Me” (Exodus 20:21), and it is stated there: “For He does avenge the blood of His servants, and renders vengeance to His adversaries, and atones for the land of [admato] His people” (Deuteronomy 32:43). This teaches that one who is buried in the earth of Eretz Yisrael is considered as though he is buried beneath the altar in the Temple. § The Gemara relates: Ulla was accustomed to ascend to Eretz Yisrael from time to time. However, he died outside of Eretz Yisrael. They came and said to Rabbi Elazar that Ulla had passed away. He said: Woe for you Ulla, as through you a verse was fulfilled: “You shall die in an unclean land” (Amos 7:17). They said to him: But his coffin is coming for burial in Eretz Yisrael. He said to them: Even so, one who was absorbed by the soil of Eretz Yisrael while he was yet alive is not similar to one who was absorbed only after death. The Gemara relates with regard to a certain man from Eretz Yisrael that a yevama, i.e., a woman whose childless husband died and left a surviving brother, happened before him, the surviving brother, for levirate marriage. This yevama was living in the district of Bei Ḥoza’a, far away in southeast Babylonia. The man came before Rabbi Ḥanina and said to him: What is the halakha as to whether I may descend to Babylonia to enter into levirate marriage with this woman? Rabbi Ḥanina said to him: His brother married a Samaritan woman [kutit] and died. Rabbi Ḥanina described the man’s late brother in these terms because he had left Eretz Yisrael to marry, and for the same reason he called his wife a Samaritan. Blessed be the Omnipresent who killed him. And yet the brother wishes to follow in his footsteps and descend after him? Better that he stay in Eretz Yisrael. § Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: Just as it is prohibited to leave Eretz Yisrael and go to Babylonia, so too, is it prohibited to leave Babylonia for any of the other lands. Rabba and Rav Yosef both say: Even to go from Pumbedita to Bei Kuvei, which is located beyond the border of Babylonia proper, is not permitted. The Gemara relates: A certain man left Pumbedita to live in Bei Kuvei, and Rav Yosef excommunicated him. A certain man left Pumbedita to live in Astonia, which also lay beyond the borders of Babylonia proper, and he died. Abaye said: Had this Torah scholar wanted, he would still be alive, as he could have stayed in Babylonia. Rabba and Rav Yosef both say: With regard to the worthy of Babylonia, Eretz Yisrael absorbs them; with regard to the worthy of other lands, Babylonia absorbs them. The Gemara asks: With regard to what matter did they issue this statement? If we say that they were referring to matters of lineage, didn’t the Master say: Lineage of residents of all lands are muddled compared to that of Eretz Yisrael, and lineage of residents of Eretz Yisrael is muddled compared to that of Babylonia. This means that the lineage of Babylonians was purer than that of the residents of Eretz Yisrael. Rather, they taught this with regard to matters of burial, i.e., the worthy of Babylonia are buried in Eretz Yisrael. Rav Yehuda said: With regard to anyone who resides in Babylon, it is as though he is residing in Eretz Yisrael, as it is stated: “Ho Zion, escape, you who dwells with the daughter of Babylon” (Zechariah 2:11). This verse equates the two countries. Abaye said: We have a tradition that Babylonia will not see the pangs of the Messiah, i.e., it will be spared the suffering that will be prevalent at the time of his arrival. Abaye interpreted this statement in reference to the city of Hutzal deVinyamin in Babylonia, and as a result people call it Karna deShizavta, Horn of Salvation, as its residents will not endure the travails of the time of the Messiah. § Rabbi Elazar said: The dead of the lands outside of Eretz Yisrael will not come alive and be resurrected in the future, as it is stated: “And I will set glory [tzvi] in the land of the living” (Ezekiel 26:20). This teaches that with regard to a land which contains My desire [tzivyoni], its dead will come alive; however, with regard to a land which does not contain My desire, i.e., outside of Eretz Yisrael, its dead will not come alive. Rabbi Abba bar Memel raised an objection from a different verse: “Your dead shall live; my dead bodies shall arise” (Isaiah 26:19). What, is it not the case that the phrase “Your dead shall live” is referring to the dead of Eretz Yisrael, whereas the subsequent phrase “My dead bodies shall arise” is referring to the dead of the lands outside of Eretz Yisrael? And if so, what is the meaning of the verse “And I will set glory [tzvi] in the land of the living”? This verse is written with regard to Nebuchadnezzar, as the Merciful One states: I will bring upon you a king who is as swift as a deer [tzvi]. Rabbi Elazar said to Rabbi Abba bar Memel: My teacher, I teach it from a different verse, as it is stated: “He gives breath to the people upon it, and spirit to they who walk there” (Isaiah 42:5). This indicates that the future resurrection is specifically for those who dwell in Eretz Yisrael. Rabbi Abba retorted: But isn’t it written: “My dead bodies shall arise”? How do you interpret this verse? Rabbi Elazar replied: That verse is not referring to those living outside Eretz Yisrael; rather, it is written with regard to stillborns, as they too will merit resurrection. The Gemara asks: And what does Rabbi Abba bar Memel do with this verse “He gives breath to the people upon it”? The Gemara answers: He requires that verse for that which was taught by Rabbi Abbahu. As Rabbi Abbahu said: Even a Canaanite maidservant in Eretz Yisrael is assured a place in the World-to-Come. It is written here: “To the people [la’am] upon it,” and it is written there: “Abide you here with [im] the donkey” (Genesis 22:5). This verse in Genesis is traditionally interpreted to mean: A people [am] that is similar to a donkey, from which it may be inferred that even the members of this people merit a share in the world to come. With regard to the aforementioned verse “And spirit to they who walk there” (Isaiah 42:5), Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba said that Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Anyone who walks four cubits in Eretz Yisrael is assured of a place in the World-to-Come. The Gemara asks: And according to the opinion of Rabbi Elazar, will the righteous outside of Eretz Yisrael not come alive at the time of the resurrection of the dead? Rabbi Ile’a said: They will be resurrected by means of rolling, i.e., they will roll until they reach Eretz Yisrael, where they will be brought back to life. Rabbi Abba Salla Rava strongly objects to this: Rolling is an ordeal that entails suffering for the righteous. Abaye said: Tunnels are prepared for them in the ground, through which they pass to Eretz Yisrael. § The verse states that Jacob commanded Joseph: “You shall carry me out of Egypt and bury me in their burying-place” (Genesis 47:30). Karna said: There are inner matters here, i.e., a secret meaning: Our Patriarch Jacob knew that he was completely righteous, and if the dead of the lands outside of Eretz Yisrael come alive, why did he trouble his sons to bring him to Eretz Yisrael? The reason is that he was concerned lest he not merit the tunnels. On a similar note, you say: “And Joseph took an oath of the children of Israel, saying: God will surely remember you, and you shall carry up my bones from here” (Genesis 50:25). Rabbi Ḥanina said: There are inner matters here. Joseph knew concerning himself that he was completely righteous, and if the dead of the lands outside of Eretz Yisrael come alive, why did he trouble his brothers to carry his coffin four hundreds parasangs to Eretz Yisrael? The reason is that he was concerned lest he not merit the tunnels. § Rabba’s brothers sent him a letter to Babylonia from Eretz Yisrael, in which they mentioned this idea that Jacob knew that he was completely righteous, as detailed above. They continued by writing that Ilfa adds matters to this statement: An incident occurred involving one who was suffering through his love for a certain woman he desired to marry, and he sought to descend from Eretz Yisrael. When he heard this idea concerning the tremendous significance of living in Eretz Yisrael, he suffered without leaving the country until the day he died. Rabba’s brothers further wrote in their letter: And although you are a great Sage, one who studies by himself is not similar to one who studies from his teacher, and therefore you should come to Eretz Yisrael. And if you say that you do not have a teacher in Eretz Yisrael, in fact you do have a teacher. And who is he? He is Rabbi Yoḥanan. And if you do not ascend to Eretz Yisrael, be careful in three matters: Do not sit excessively, as sitting is harmful with regard to hemorrhoids; do not stand excessively, as standing is harmful with regard to heart trouble; and do not walk excessively, as walking is harmful with regard to eye problems. Rather, divide your time: One-third for sitting, one-third for standing, and one-third for walking. Rabba’s brothers offered him more advice in their letter: With regard to any sitting that is without support, i.e., an object on which to lean, standing is more comfortable than that position. The Gemara asks: Can it enter your mind that standing is better than sitting? Didn’t you say that standing is harmful with regard to heart trouble? Rather, with regard to sitting without support, standing with a support, i.e. an object against which one can lean, is better than it.

משנה תורה, הלכות מלכים ומלחמות ה׳:ט׳

אָסוּר לָצֵאת מֵאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל לְחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ לְעוֹלָם. אֶלָּא לִלְמֹד תּוֹרָה אוֹ לִשָּׂא אִשָּׁה אוֹ לְהַצִּיל מִן הָעַכּוּ"ם. וְיַחְזֹר לָאָרֶץ. וְכֵן יוֹצֵא הוּא לִסְחוֹרָה. אֲבָל לִשְׁכֹּן בְּחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ אָסוּר אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן חָזַק שָׁם הָרָעָב עַד שֶׁנַּעֲשָׂה שְׁוֵה דִּינָר חִטִּין בִּשְׁנֵי דִּינָרִין. בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים כְּשֶׁהָיוּ הַמָּעוֹת מְצוּיוֹת וְהַפֵּרוֹת בְּיֹקֶר. אֲבָל אִם הַפֵּרוֹת בְּזוֹל וְלֹא יִמְצָא מָעוֹת וְלֹא בְּמָה יִשְׂתַּכֵּר וְאָבְדָה פְּרוּטָה מִן הַכִּיס. יֵצֵא לְכָל מָקוֹם שֶׁיִּמְצָא בּוֹ רֶוַח. וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁמֻּתָּר לָצֵאת אֵינָהּ מִדַּת חֲסִידוּת שֶׁהֲרֵי מַחְלוֹן וְכִלְיוֹן שְׁנֵי גְּדוֹלֵי הַדּוֹר הָיוּ וּמִפְּנֵי צָרָה גְּדוֹלָה יָצְאוּ וְנִתְחַיְּבוּ כְּלָיָה לַמָּקוֹם:

Mishneh Torah, Kings and Wars 5:9

It is forbidden to leave Eretz Yisrael for the Diaspora at all times except:
to study Torah;
to marry; or
to save one's property from the gentiles.
After accomplishing these objectives, one must return to Eretz Yisrael.
Similarly, one may leave Eretz Yisrael to conduct commercial enterprises. However, it is forbidden to leave with the intent of settling permanently in the Diaspora unless the famine in Eretz Yisrael is so severe that a dinar's worth of wheat is sold at two dinarim.
When do these conditions apply? When one possesses financial resources and food is expensive. However, if food is inexpensive, but a person cannot find financial resources or employment and has no money available, he may leave and go to any place where he can find relief.
Though it is permitted to leave Eretz Yisrael under these circumstances, it is not pious behavior. Behold, Machlon and Kilyon were two of the great men of the generation and they left Eretz Yisrael only out of great distress. Nevertheless, they were found worthy of death by God.

אור לישרים על תלמוד ירושלמי מועד קטן ג׳:א׳:ג׳

לפי הבבלי, רבי יהודה אוסר לצאת למדינת הים מפני שאסור לצאת מארץ ישראל לחוץ לארץ (תוספתא עבודה זרה ד,ד ובבלי בבא בתרא צא,א, וטעם האיסור הוא משום שמפקיע את עצמו מן המצוות התלויות בארץ (רשב"ם)). לכן לפי הבבלי, חכמים מודים לרבי יהודה כשיצא לשוט, מפני שלדעת הכל אסור לצאת מארץ ישראל לחוץ לארץ לטייל, ולא נחלקו אלא כשיצא להרווחה, שלרעת חכמים מותר לצאת לחוץ לארץ להרווחה, ולדעת רבי יהודה אסור לצאת אפילו להרווחה, ואינו מותר אלא לצורך פרנסתו, וכיון שאסור לצאת ויצא לא התירו לו לגלח כשבא בחול המועד.

אבל לפי הירושלמי, רבי יהודה אוסר לצאת למדינת הים מפני שלדעתו אסור להפליג בים הגדול, וטעם האיסור הוא משום סכנה. לכן לפי הירושלמי, אין חכמים מודים לרבי יהודה, מפני שלדעת חכמים מותר להפליג בים הגדול.

Ohr LaYesharim on Jerusalem Talmud Moed Katan 3:1:3

...