If you have not seen פרקים ל״ז,מ״ב,מ״ה, read those first.
Because the Yosef story takes up a large chunk of Sefer Bereishit we are going to analyze the sources by certain stories/interactions. At the end we will present a larger understanding of the ideas.
Yaakov's Favoritism Towards Yosef (ל״ז א-ד)
(ב) אֵ֣לֶּה ׀ תֹּלְד֣וֹת יַעֲקֹ֗ב יוֹסֵ֞ף בֶּן־שְׁבַֽע־עֶשְׂרֵ֤ה שָׁנָה֙ הָיָ֨ה רֹעֶ֤ה אֶת־אֶחָיו֙ בַּצֹּ֔אן וְה֣וּא נַ֗עַר אֶת־בְּנֵ֥י בִלְהָ֛ה וְאֶת־בְּנֵ֥י זִלְפָּ֖ה נְשֵׁ֣י אָבִ֑יו וַיָּבֵ֥א יוֹסֵ֛ף אֶת־דִּבָּתָ֥ם רָעָ֖ה אֶל־אֲבִיהֶֽם׃
(2) This, then, is the line of Jacob: At seventeen years of age, Joseph tended the flocks with his brothers, as a helper to the sons of his father’s wives Bilhah and Zilpah. And Joseph brought bad reports of them to their father.
(ד) את דבתם רעה. כָּל רָעָה שֶׁהָיָה רוֹאֶה בְאֶחָיו בְנֵי לֵאָה הָיָה מַגִּיד לְאָבִיו, שֶׁהָיוּ אוֹכְלִין אֵבֶר מִן הַחַי, וּמְזַלְזְלִין בִּבְנֵי הַשְּׁפָחוֹת לִקְרוֹתָן עֲבָדִים, וַחֲשׁוּדִים עַל הָעֲרָיוֹת, וּבִשְׁלָשְׁתָּן לָקָה: וַיִּשְׁחֲטוּ שְׂעִיר עִזִּים בִּמְכִירָתוֹ וְלֹא אֲכָלוּהוּ חַי, וְעַל דִּבָּה שֶׁסִּפֵּר עֲלֵיהֶם שֶׁקּוֹרִין לַאֲחֵיהֶם עֲבָדִים – "לְעֶבֶד נִמְכַּר יוֹסֵף", וְעַל עֲרָיוֹת שֶׁסִּפֵּר עֲלֵיהֶם, וַתִּשָּׂא אֵשֶׁת אֲדֹנָיו וְגוֹ: (ה) דבתם. כָּל לְשׁוֹן דִּבָּה פרלדי"ץ בְּלַעַז, כָּל מַה שֶּׁהָיָה יָכוֹל לְדַבֵּר בָּהֶם רָעָה, הָיָה מְסַפֵּר:
(4) את דבתם רעה THEIR EVIL REPORT — Whatever he saw wrong in his brothers, the sons of Leah, he reported to his father: that they used to eat flesh cut off from a living animal, that they treated the sons of the handmaids with contempt, calling them slaves, and that they were suspected of living in an immoral manner. With three such similar matters he was therefore punished. In consequence of his having stated that they used to eat flesh cut off from a living animal Scripture states, (Genesis 37:31) “And they slew a he-goat" after they had sold him and they did not eat its flesh whilst the animal was still living. And because of the slander which he related about them that they called their brothers slaves — (Psalms 105:17) “Joseph was sold for a slave.” And because he charged them with immorality (Genesis 39:7) “his master’s wife cast her eyes upon him etc.” (Genesis Rabbah 84:7). (5) דבתם THEIR REPORT — The word דבה always means in old French parleriz; English, gossip: whatever he could speak bad about them he told to his father.
(ד) ויבא יוסף את דבתם רעה. באמרו לאביו שאחיו היו טועים ומפסידים בבלי דעת כראוי במלאכת המקנה שהית' אז עקר השתדלות' בקניי' עושר ונכסי':
(4) ויבא יוסף את דבתם רעה, he told his father that his brothers, because of unintentional errors, i.e. lack of professional competence, caused him financial losses in his flocks, seeing that at the time they were preoccupied primarily with increasing their material wealth.
Guiding Questions:
We are presented with 3 options of what the "bad report" Yosef gives to Yaakov is about:
1. They were doing immoral things (Rashi a)
2. He was tattling (Rashi b)
3. They were making professional/ financial errors (Sforno)
Based on all of the above sources, was it right or wrong for Yosef to report these things to his father? How would his brothers feel in each scenario?
(ג) וְיִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל אָהַ֤ב אֶת־יוֹסֵף֙ מִכׇּל־בָּנָ֔יו כִּֽי־בֶן־זְקֻנִ֥ים ה֖וּא ל֑וֹ וְעָ֥שָׂה ל֖וֹ כְּתֹ֥נֶת פַּסִּֽים׃ (ד) וַיִּרְא֣וּ אֶחָ֗יו כִּֽי־אֹת֞וֹ אָהַ֤ב אֲבִיהֶם֙ מִכׇּל־אֶחָ֔יו וַֽיִּשְׂנְא֖וּ אֹת֑וֹ וְלֹ֥א יָכְל֖וּ דַּבְּר֥וֹ לְשָׁלֹֽם׃
(3) Now Israel loved Joseph best of all his sons—he was his “child of old age”and he had made him an ornamented tunic. (Or “a coat of many colors”). (4) And when his brothers saw that their father loved him more than any of his brothers, they hated him so that they could not speak a friendly word to him.
(א) בן זקנים. שֶׁנּוֹלַד לוֹ לְעֵת זִקְנָתוֹ. וְאֻנְקְלוֹס תִּרְגֵּם בַּר חַכִּים הוּא לֵהּ – כָּל מַה שֶּׁלָּמַד מִשֵּׁם וָעֵבֶר מָסַר לוֹ. דָּ"אַ, שֶׁהָיָה זִיו אִיקוֹנִין שֶׁלוֹ דּוֹמֶה לוֹ:
(1) בן זקנים THE SON OF HIS OLD AGE — because he was a wise son to him” — all that he had learnt from Shem and Eber he taught him (Genesis Rabbah 84:8). Another explanation of בן זקנים— his facial features were similar to his (Jacob’s) (Genesis Rabbah 84:8).
(א) כי בן זקונים הוא. כמשמעו כי הולידו והוא בן תשעים ואחת שנה גם כן אחיו בנימין קראו וילד זקונים ואחר אלה שניהם לא נולד לו:
(1) BECAUSE HE WAS THE SON OF HIS OLD AGE. This is to be taken literally since Joseph was born to Jacob when the latter was ninety-one years old.
Guiding Questions:
Here, we again see two different approaches to the פסוקים:
1) Yosef has a good reason to be favorited, he's more righteous than his brothers (this makes a lot of sense especially in Rashi's view that brothers were sinners)
2) Yosef has a neutral reason to be favorited; Yosef is favorited because he was born to an older father.
Do you think Yosef deserved to be favorited? Should a parent ever favorite a child? Does it matter why Yaakov favorited Yosef? How do you think the other brothers felt?
(א) וישראל אהב וגו'. הקדים לתת טעם למשטמתם של אחים לאח קטן ואמר וישראל וגו' פי' כי הגם שיוסף הוציא דבת אחיו אף על פי כן לא היה דבר רע יוצא כי היו האחים מתווכחים עמו ומוכיחים אותו וסרה קנאתם אלא לצד כי נוסף דבר זה שאהב ישראל וגו' מכל אחיו פי' יותר מכלן יחד, גם פרסם האהבה והודיעה להם במה שעשה לו כתונת פסים והרי זה מגיד שידעו וידע אביהן שידעו, והוא אומרו ויראו אחיו כי וגו', ומעתה בבוא השנאה לא היה לה תקוה לתקן ולשום שלום, והוא אומרו וישנאו אותו פי' ממה שקדם מעשיו שהביא דבתם רעה ולא יכלו וגו' לצד רואם כי הוא אהוב מכולן לאביו אין מציאות להתווכח עמו כי דבריו יצדקו ולא דבריהם וכיון שאינם יכולין להעמידו בתוכחת מגולה שיכלם על אשר עשהו ולא ישוב עוד בדבר הזה אין מציאות לחזור בו. והוא אומרו ולא יכלו דברו בקושי לשלום פירוש לעשות באמצעות זה שלום:
(1) וישראל אהב את יוסף, Israel loved Joseph, etc. The Torah reported this here in order to provide the rationale for the brothers' hatred of their younger, i.e. their "little" brother Joseph. The reason the verse begins with the conjunctive letter ו in front of ישראל is to inform us that if the tale-bearing would have been the only problem, the brothers could have coped with that; they would have argued with Joseph and convinced him that his suspicions were unfounded. It was the additional element of their father displaying distinct favoritism which poisoned the atmosphere between Joseph and his brothers. Not only did Jacob love Joseph better than all his other sons combined, but he even made a public display of this. Once this hatred of Joseph had become a factor in their mutual relations nothing could correct the situation. There was no longer any point in the brothers speaking peacefully, i.e. trying to make peace with the tale-bearer, seeing he was so clearly their father's favorite.
Some related background - why is this coat such a big deal?
1) We know the כתונת פסים is something that royalty would wear (Tamar, David's daughter wears one)
2) Assuming the כתונת פסים was super colorful (it's up for makhloket), it would be very, very expensive to make. The art of dying clothing started roughly around the period when Avraham was alive. Thus making dying clothing a very new and expensive trend. In today's money, to make a garment like a כתונת פסים would cost around $5,000,000 (using the ancient dying methods). In Yosef's day it would have been truly priceless.
So, knowing that, how do you think the brothers felt after Yosef got this? Why do you think the כתונת פסים might have set them over the edge?
Yosef and His Dreams (ל״ז ה-י״א)
(א) ויגד לאחיו. גם זה עשה מחסרון העצה כנער: (א) שמעו נא החלום הזה. לא די שספר החלום כי גם אמר להם שמעו נא כלומ' הבינו את הוראת החלום ובזה הוסיף להטיל איבת אחיו עליו כמו שאמרו המלוך תמלוך עלינו:
(1) ויגד לאחיו, this too was an ill advised move. Had he been more mature he would have kept the contents of such a dream to himself. (1) שמעו נא החלום הזה, not only did he tell them his dream, as something by the way, but he invited them to listen to him tell it by saying שמעו נא “please pay attention!” This could not fail to intensify the hostility of his brothers, as we see immediately by their reaction: “do you plan to rule over us?!”
(א) ויחלום יוסף וגו'. צריך לדעת למה היה יוסף מגדיל השנאה במה שהיה מספר חלומות גדולתו מגידות, ומה גם אחר יודעו כי הוא שנאוי בעיניהם כאומרם ז"ל (ב"ר פ' פ"ד) בפסוק ויאמר לו הנני שמסר עצמו למיתה. ואולי כי נתכוון להודיע אותם כי מן השמים העלוהו למעלה ומעשה יעקב היא בהסכמת עליונים ומזה יחדלו משנוא אותו:
(1) ויחלום יוסף חלום. Joseph had a dream. Why did Joseph add to his brothers' hatred of him by telling them of his grandiose dreams? Furthermore, knowing as he did that the brothers hated him fiercely, why did he accept his father's mission (verse 14) and venture "into the lion's den?" Perhaps Joseph went to tell his brothers that they were wrong in saying his dreams came from his ambitions, but that for some reason G'd planned to elevate him to a high position and that Jacob's agreeing to send him on this mission was a sign that all of this had been approved by G'd. He may have hoped to lessen their hatred of him by accepting the misssion.
Guiding Questions:
There is a makhloket here if Yosef was trying to boast or make his brothers feel better. Which one makes more sense to you? Should Yosef have shared his dreams? How do you think they felt?
Yosef and the Pit (ל״ז: י״ב-ל״ו)
Review בראשית ל״ז:י״ג-ל״ה
(יט) וַיֹּאמְר֖וּ אִ֣ישׁ אֶל־אָחִ֑יו הִנֵּ֗ה בַּ֛עַל הַחֲלֹמ֥וֹת הַלָּזֶ֖ה בָּֽא׃
(19) They said to one another, “Here comes that dreamer!
(1)הַלָּ֫זֶה, הַלֵּ֫זוּ this; masc. this dreamer (contemptuously - they said it with disdain/anger)
(א) והבור רק אין בו מים. מִמַּשְׁמַע שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר וְהַבּוֹר רֵק, אֵינִי יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ מַיִם, מַה תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר אֵין בּוֹ מָיִם? מַיִם אֵין בּוֹ, אֲבָל נְחָשִׁים וְעַקְרַבִּים יֵשׁ בּוֹ (בראשית רבה, שבת כ"ב):
(1) והבור רק אין בו מים AND THE PIT WAS EMPTY, THERE WAS NO WATER IN IT — Since it states, “the pit was empty”, do I not know that “there was no water in it”? What then is the force of “there was no water in it”? Water, indeed it did not contain, but there were serpents and scorpions in it (Shabbat 22a).
Guiding Questions:
1) How were the brothers feeling when Yosef approached them?
2) How do you think Yosef was feeling about his brothers?
Miketz | Yosef and His Brothers
Rav Menachem Leibtag
Part I: "Sinat Achim" & Idealism To uncover the motive behind the brothers' hatred of Yosef, we must return to the story of Yosef's dreams (at the beginning of Parshat Vayeshev). Let's begin with a quick review of these two dreams:
One need not be a prophet in order to interpret Yosef's two dreams. Clearly, they point to his developing sense of superiority over the entire family. However, they also echo an earlier sibling rivalry in Chumash - that between Yaakov and Eisav! Recall the blessing that Yitzchak gave to Yaakov, though he intended to give it to Eisav:
This parallel suggests that Yosef's dreams may not only hint to his future leadership position, but they could also point to Yosef as the only 'chosen son,' just as Yaakov himself emerged as Yitzchak's only chosen son! Add to this:
Yaakov's love and special treatment of Yosef (see 37:3);
His "ktonet pasim" (special cloak), a sign of royalty; Yosef is the first son of Rachel, Yaakov's 'primary' wife; Yaakov's silence regarding Yosef's dreams (see 37:11);
and the conclusion is obvious: Yaakov plans to name Yosef (or possibly Yosef and Binyamin, the son's of Rachel) his exclusive heir(s). (See Board #1.) Yosef's dreams simply add 'fuel to the fire!'
This background allows us to suggest an ideological basis for the brothers' decision to kill Yosef.
All in the Name of God Had Yosef been a bit more righteous in his brothers' eyes, they may have conceded to his destiny as either the 'leader' or the 'chosen' son. However, their perception of Yosef's character troubled them. In their eyes, Yosef was a slanderer:
The brothers, aware of the challenges facing God's special Nation, recognized the need for exemplary leadership. Could Yosef possibly assume this role? To the brothers, the mere thought of 'Yosef the Slanderer' becoming the leader was horrific. From their perspective, it was simply unthinkable that Yosef could assume the leadership of a nation destined by God to be characterized by "tzedek u'mishpat" (see 18:19). For the sake of "klal Yisrael," they conclude: Yosef must be weeded out!
Hence, the brothers faced a predicament similar to that of Rivka in the previous generation. Just as Rivka had realized that Yitzchak was mistaken in his favoring of Eisav, so too the brothers realize Yaakov's mistake in favoring Yosef. Just as Rivka resorted to 'trickery' to ensure that the proper son would be blessed, so too the brothers decide to use 'trickery' to ensure that Yosef would not be appointed their leader. Considering that the entire fate of "Am Yisrael" was at stake, the brothers allow themselves to 'bend the rules' a bit, so as to secure the nation's future.
An ideal opportunity (for the brothers) arises when Yosef arrives at Dotan to visit them. In order to dispose of this menace, they plot first to kill him. Later they opt to sell him off to a distant land. In either case, their stated goal is to make sure that Yosef is removed from the Divine family (see 37:20 - "v'nireh mah yihyu chalomotav"). Out of respect and concern for their father, lest he fret and worry about his 'missing' son for the rest of his life, they will dip Yosef's coat in blood so that Yaakov will think that he was truly dead. Hopefully, their father will finally realize that Yosef was "nidcheh" (rejected), and now Am Yisrael can continue to develop in the proper fashion. (See Board #2.)
Thus, based on the theme of Sefer Breishit, the brothers' plot to dispose of Yosef, though inexcusable, is understandable. It is not simply out of petty jealousy that they want to kill Yosef, but rather out of a 'sincere' concern for the future of Am Yisrael.
Guiding Questions:
How does Rav Leibtag change your perspective on the brothers? What do you think of their actions now?