Who is Nimrod? What is his perspective on his role in the world, and the relationship between humans and Hashem? How does Avram counteract Nimrod's ideas and actions? What does Avram reveal about the role of the Jewish people in the world?
What do you think of Nimrod? What is unique about him? What does he represent, and how can we assess his character within the context of Bereishis?
How does Rashi see Nimrod?
What is Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer's opinion on Nimrod?
But Rabbi Abraham ibn Ezra explained the matter in the opposite way, by way of the plain meaning of Scripture, for he interpreted the verses thus: He began to be a mighty one over the animals in hunting them. Before the Eternal, Ibn Ezra explained, means that he would build altars and offer the animals as whole-offerings before G-d. But Ibn Ezra’s words do not appear to be correct, and lo he justifieth the wicked, for our Rabbis knew by tradition of Nimrod’s wickedness.
The correct interpretation appears to me to be that Nimrod began to be a ruler by force over people, and he was the first monarch. Until his era there were no wars and no reigning monarchs; it was he who first prevailed over the people of Babylon until they crowned him. After that he went to Assyria, and he did according to his will, and magnified himself, and there he built fortified cities with his power and with his might. This is what Scripture intended when it said, And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel…and Accad…and Shinar.
What does Ramban think?
How do you interpret the Migdal Bavel? What might have angered Hashem, and what might Hashem's reaction convey?
Note: reference additional commentaries (ie. Artscroll and others).
How do the commentaries add to our understanding of Migdal Bavel?
How does this sugya add to our understanding of Nimrod's character and Migdal Bavel?
Rabba Sara Hurwitz
Conformity, where everyone ascribes to a shared mission and vision, was the operating ethic in the world after the Flood, a state described in chapter 11 of parshat Noach: “The whole world was of one language and of one common purpose.”
It is a wonderful image of unity and togetherness. The story of the Tower of Babel continues:
הָ֚בָה נִלְבְּנָ֣ה לְבֵנִ֔ים וְנִשְׂרְפָ֖ה לִשְׂרֵפָ֑ה וַתְּהִ֨י לָהֶ֤ם הַלְּבֵנָה֙ לְאָ֔בֶן וְהַ֣חֵמָ֔ר הָיָ֥ה לָהֶ֖ם לַחֹֽמֶר׃ (ד) וַיֹּאמְר֞וּ הָ֣בָה ׀ נִבְנֶה־לָּ֣נוּ עִ֗יר וּמִגְדָּל֙ וְרֹאשׁ֣וֹ בַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וְנַֽעֲשֶׂה־לָּ֖נוּ שֵׁ֑ם
Let us make bricks. Let us build a city and a tower with its tops in heaven, and let us make a name for ourselves.
At first glance, the Torah seems to be describing a utopian community where everyone is united around a common purpose. Emphasizing the plurality — the “us” — creates an image of a society that seamlessly moves together, in one large mass, with one voice.
And yet, God severely punishes the people of Babel. In one fell swoop, God destroys their unity and scatters them all over the earth.
God lashes out against conformity. But why is sameness so bad? The problem with Bavel is that the people didn’t actually care about unity, oneness and togetherness. They used their unity to build walls, not relationships.
The Pirkei D’rabbi Eliezer, an aggadic-midrashic work on Genesis, ascribed to R. Eliezer ben Hyrcanus in the ninth century (chapter 24), describes that the people loved their tower more than people. “It had seven steps from the east and seven steps from the west. Bricks were hauled up from one side, and the descent would be from the other. If one man fell down and died, no attention was paid to him, but if one brick fell down, they would sit and weep…” This was not a society that cared about one another. A united society that is built on prioritizing material wealth — bricks and mortar — over human life and well-being is not a sustainable community.
Perhaps then, God’s so-called punishment — the demand for diversity — was not meant to reprimand the people, but to teach them to rebuild their world placing harmony, not conformity, at the center of their world. Our rabbis teach that when God created the world, God had intended for people to occupy most of the earth; the ultimate divine plan was not to gather in one section of the world, but to be fruitful and multiply throughout the land.
And thus, God spreads the people throughout the world to develop our sense of harmony. “Harmony,” by definition, includes different sounding elements, and when they play together the sound is richer. Now that the world was made up of people with diverse languages and cultures, everyone needed to work that much harder to bring down their personal walls, and learn to live with and love one another. Harmony is an ethic that can live between those who are the same as well as those who are different.
What is Rabba Hurwitz's perspective?
“Haran died during the lifetime of Teraḥ his father” – Rabbi Ḥiyya grandson of Rav Ada of Yafo: Teraḥ was an idol worshipper [and a seller of idols]. One time, he went away to some place, and he installed Abraham as salesman in his stead. A person would come seeking to buy. He [Abraham] would say to him: ‘How old are you?’ He would say to him: ‘Fifty or sixty years old.’ He would say to him: ‘Woe to this man who is sixty years old and seeks to prostrate himself before something that is one day old.’ He would be ashamed and leave. One time, a certain woman came, carrying a dish of fine flour in her hand. She said to him: ‘Here, offer it before them.’ He arose, took a club in his hand, shattered all the idols, and placed the club in the hand of the largest among them. When his father came, he said to him: ‘Who did this to them?’ He said to him: ‘I will not lie to you, a certain woman came, carrying a dish of fine flour in her hand. She said to me: Here, offer it before them. I offered it before them. This one [idol] said: I shall eat first, and another one said: I shall eat first. This big idol, who was standing among them, got up and took the club and shattered them.’ He [Teraḥ] said to him: ‘What, are you mocking me? Are they sentient at all?’ He said to him: ‘Do your ears not hear what your mouth is saying?’
He [Teraḥ] took him and handed him over to Nimrod. He [Nimrod] said to him [Abraham]: ‘Let us bow down to fire.’ Abraham said to him: ‘Let us better bow down to water, that extinguishes fire.’ Nimrod said to him: ‘[All right,] let us bow down to water.’ He said to him: ‘If so, let us bow down to the clouds, that bear the water.’ He said to him: ‘[All right,] let us bow down to the clouds.’ He said to him: ‘If so, let us bow down to the wind, that scatters the clouds.’ He said to him: ‘[All right,] let us bow down to the wind.’ He said to him: ‘Better let us bow down to a person, who can withstand the wind.’ He said to him: ‘You are saying mere words. I bow down only to fire. I will cast you into it, and let that God to whom you bow down come and rescue you from it.’ Haran was there and he was conflicted. He said: ‘Either way [I will know what to do]; If Abraham is victorious, I will say: I am with Abraham, and if Nimrod is victorious, I will say: I am with Nimrod.’ When Abraham descended into the fiery furnace and was rescued, they said to him [Haran]: ‘With whom are you?’ He said to them: ‘I am with Abraham.’ They took him and cast him into the fire and his innards were scorched. He emerged and died in the presence of Teraḥ his father. That is what is written: “Haran died in the presence of Teraḥ…”
What does this story reveal? What lessons can we learn from Avram? How are his character and ideology in conversation with Nimrod's?
Whose breasts are not yet formed.
What shall we do for our sister
When she is spoken for? If she be a wall,
We will build upon it a silver battlement;
If she be a door,
We will panel it in cedar.” I am a wall,
My breasts are like towers.
So I became in his eyes
As one who finds favor.
What does this Midrash reveal?