Read the following excerpts from Bereishit. Turn to your partner, and using only this text without any outside knowledge, tell me about the God implied in this text.
(5) יי came down in a cloud—and stood with him there, proclaiming the name יי. (6) יי passed before him and proclaimed: “!יי! יי a God compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in kindness and faithfulness, (7) extending kindness to the thousandth generation, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin—yet not remitting all punishment, but visiting the iniquity of parents upon children and children’s children, upon the third and fourth generations.”
(1) יי spoke to Moses, saying: (2) Speak to the Israelite people thus: When a person unwittingly incurs guilt in regard to any of יי’s commandments about things not to be done, and does one of them— (3) If it is the anointed priest who has incurred guilt, so that blame falls upon the people, he shall offer for the sin of which he is guilty a bull of the herd without blemish as a sin offering to יי. (4) He shall bring the bull to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, before יי, and lay a hand upon the head of the bull. The bull shall be slaughtered before יי, (5) and the anointed priest shall take some of the bull’s blood and bring it into the Tent of Meeting. (6) The priest shall dip his finger in the blood, and sprinkle of the blood seven times before יי, in front of the curtain of the Shrine. (7) The priest shall put some of the blood on the horns of the altar of aromatic incense, which is in the Tent of Meeting, before יי; and all the rest of the bull’s blood he shall pour out at the base of the altar of burnt offering, which is at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting.
"The texts of Leviticus are not theological tractates. Rather, they are exempla of a genre of cultic instructions for cultic professionals. They tell the priests what they must do to keep the cultic system functioning properly. In other words, they are instruction manuals for priests. Instruction manuals are, by definition, instrumental. Their goal is to tell their readers how to use an object, not to describe an object's essence. A contemporary instruction manual for a microwave oven does not explain how microwaves work to heat the food...If one were to read the owner's manual for information about the nature of microwave technology, one would come up, like Wellhausen and Kaufmann do, empty."
With this metaphor in mind, how would you infer the underlying theology of Vayikra?
"[Priestly Torah] assigns direct speech to God only when He communicates with Moses...in PT, we never find God employing the personal pronoun אני...[and] punishment is strictly impersonal. [...] The term ברית is limited in PT to the Genesis period. In establishing the ברית, God commits himself to rewarding his creatures if they observe the moral commandments. The revelation of the name of Yahweh to Moses signals the replacement of the covenant (ברית) by the pact (עדות) in the realm of Israelite faith. According to PT, the relationship between God and Israel is no longer defined through providence and recompense, nor is it related to the observance of moral laws and the practice of justice. The center of the religious life is henceforth to be the divine command - the עדות - demanding the worship of God without any expectation of reward - a worship completely detached from basic needs or the shaping of the social order. The universal moral covenant - the ברית - remains in force in the realm of relations between a man and his fellow man; it determines the Israelite social order as well." pp.169-173
"[Jacob] Milgrom proposes that, even though the divine nature is not described in the priestly source, we can get at that nature by examining those things that are set in opposition to it. In other words, by analyzing the nature of the sacred pollutants, and positing their opposite, we can get at the nature of the divine that they threaten. According to Milgrom, the list of sacred contaminants: corpses, skin disease, house and cloth mold, childbirth and genital discharge are all linked in one way or another with death. If the sacred pollutants are death, then the numinous force that they threaten must represent life."
"The Priestly Torah gestures towards a God who is rigorously non-anthropomorphic and amoral. For many contemporary readers, nuclear energy provides an apt analogy. Like nuclear energy, the numinous God of the priestly source is an amoral, impersonal power whose presence can be enormously beneficial to the community. However, if the sacred 'clean room' is contaminated, the power ceases to generate life-giving energy or releases in a destructive form...The idea of a 'nuclear' God has the power to address contemporary experiences of the numinous without engaging the problems of anthropomorphism, theodicy and supernatural interventionism bound up in other pentateuchal theologies."
Final question:
Consider the interpretation that the priestly cult represented the biblical instructions for how to relate to a non-anthropomorphic God; we practice post-Temple rabbinic Judaism. How might we construct our own instruction manual for relating to a non-anthropomorphic God?
