Splitting of the Yam Suf 2.0

"And the children of Israel went into the sea in dry ground" - the angels of service were astounded, saying: 'the children of Israel, idolaters that they are, are coming on dry land?!' And from where do we know that even the sea was filled with rage from Above? Because the text says "and the waters were like rage to them" [since the vav is missing to the word chomah, wall, it can be read as chema, rage; so you can re-read the verse as "the water was like anger on their right and on their left"]. A

......The lowest possible plural is two, to state that because of only two people, the sea split – they were Datan and Aviram, about whom Our Rabbis say, that they remained (in Egypt) and the sea split only for them

...anything you can blame them (Dasan and Aviram) for... blame them....

...They sacrificed themselves at the hands of the taskmasters and said; it is better for us to get beaten rather than the rest of the people. Therefore when Hashem said to Moshe ‘Gather for me 70 men’ Moshe said to Hashem; ‘How will I know who is appropriate?’ He said ‘the elders and the officers who sacrificed themselves and were beaten up in Egypt’……From here you can learn that anyone who dedicates himself for the sake of Israel merits honour, glory (and prophecy….)

(29) “He turned this way and that and saw that there was no man; he smote the Egyptian and concealed him in the sand” (Exodus 2:12).
“He saw that there was no man,” because he was deserving of death. Rabbi Yehuda says: There was no man who would be zealous on behalf of the Holy One blessed be He, and kill him. Rabbi Neḥemya says: He saw that there was no one who would invoke the name of God and kill him. The Rabbis say: He saw that there was no expectation that righteous people would emerge from him or from his descendants until the end of all the generations. When Moses saw this, he consulted with the angels and said to them: ‘Is this one liable for execution?’ They said: ‘Yes.’ That is what is written: “He saw that there was no man” – who would speak in his favor.
“He smote the Egyptian.” With what did he kill him? Rabbi Evyatar said: He struck him with a fist. Some say: He took a mortar rake and removed his brain. The Rabbis say: He invoked the name of God and killed him, as it is stated; “Do you propose [omer] to kill me [as you killed the Egyptian?]” (Exodus 2:14).
“He concealed him in the sand” as there was no one there other than Israelites. He concealed him before Israel, who were likened to sand. He said to them: ‘You were likened to sand; just as sand, a person takes it from here and places it there and no sound is heard, so too, this matter will remain concealed among you and will not be heard.’ Indeed, you find that the matter was heard only by means of the Hebrews, as it is stated: “He went out on the second day and behold, two Hebrew men were fighting [nitzim]; [he said to the wicked one: why do you strike your counterpart?]” (Exodus 2:13). These are Datan and Aviram, and it called them nitzim after their end.64“They are Datan and Aviram…who agitated [hitzu] against Moses…when they agitated [behatzotam] against the Lord” (Numbers 26:9). It was they who said this matter, it was they who left over some of the manna. It was they who said: “Let us appoint a leader and return to Egypt” (Numbers 14:4). And it was they who agitated at the Red Sea.
Alternatively, [they are called] nitzim because they intended to kill one another, as it is said: “If men fight together” (Deuteronomy 25:11), and Rabbi Elazar said: The verse is referring to a fight to the death.
“He said to the wicked one: Why do you strike your counterpart?” Why did you strike is not stated, but rather “why do you strike.” From here it is derived that from the moment that a person raises his hand against another, even if he does not strike him, he is called wicked. “Your counterpart,” who is wicked like you are; this teaches both of them were wicked.