איש צדיק תמים היה יזכיר הכתוב שהיה זכאי ושלם בצדקו להודיע שראוי להנצל מן המבול שאין לו עונש כלל כי הוא תמים בצדק כי הצדיק הוא...
שאמר שהוא איש צדיק כי איננו איש חמס ומשחית דרכו כבני דורו החייבים אמר שהיה מתהלך את השם הנכבד ליראה אותו לבדו איננו נפתה אחרי הוברי שמים ומנחש ועונן וכל שכן אחרי עבודה זרה ואיננו שומע להם כלל רק בשם לבדו הוא דבק תמיד והולך בדרך אשר בחר השם או אשר יורה אותו כי נביא היה וזה כטעם אחרי יי אלקיכם תלכו ואותו תיראו (דברים יג ה) הנאמר בהרחקת המתנבא לעבוד עבודה זרה ונותן אות ומופת כאשר אפרש ועוד אזכיר זה בפסוק התהלך לפני והיה תמים (בראשית י״ז:א׳) אם יהיה תמים דעות עמי והנה אחר שהיה נח צדיק ואיננו ראוי ליענש גם בניו וביתו ראוים להנצל בזכותו כי היה עונש עליו אם יכרת זרעו או יאמר כי הוא צדיק שלם וגם בניו וביתו צדיקים כי הוא למדם כענין שכתוב (בראשית י״ח:י״ט) כי ידעתיו למען אשר יצוה את בניו ואת ביתו:
HE WAS A RIGHTEOUS MAN AND WHOLE-HEARTED. Scripture mentions that he was guiltless and perfect in his righteousness in order to inform us that he was worthy to be saved from the flood without any punishment whatever since he was whole-hearted in righteousness....
Now after Scripture said that Noah was a righteous man, meaning that he was neither a man of violence nor one who perverted his ways as did the guilty ones of his generation, it further said that he walked with the glorious Name, fearing Him alone. He was not enticed by the astrologers, enchanters and soothsayers, and surely not by idolatry, and he paid no heed to them at all; to G-d alone he did always cleave, and he walked in the way G-d chose or taught him for he was a prophet. This is analogous in meaning to the verse, After the Eternal your G-d shall ye walk, and Him shall ye fear, which is stated in connection with the removal of him who prophesies to encourage the worship of idols and gives a sign or wonder to verify his words, as I will explain.
I will again mention this in connection with the verse, Walk before Me, and be thou whole-hearted, if He Who is perfect in knowledge will be with me.
Now since Noah was a righteous man and undeserving of punishment, it was fitting that his sons and his household be saved by his merit for if his sons were to perish, it would have been a punishment upon him. Or it may be said that he was a perfectly righteous man, and his sons and household were also righteous since he taught them; this is analogous to that which is written concerning Abraham: For I have known him, to the end that he may command his children and his household.
מפני מי המבול, “on account of the waters of the deluge, and not on account of G-d’s command to enter the ark.
"Before the water..." - He went in before they came. And we don't know the reason why he (Rashi) says in his interpretation that he was of little faith. Because the text testifies that he was righteous and pure and that he did everything God commanded!
… Let us consider Rashis comment that “Noah was among those of limited faith.” How could this be, since the Torah itself testifies that Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his age? … We can explain the matter as follows: there are two types of tsaddikim who serve the Creator: there is the tsaddik who serves God faithfully and believes that he was the power to direct the cosmos according to his will. As our sages of blessed memory stated, “the Holy one decrees and the Tsaddik annuls the decree in favor of the good!” (Moed Katan 16b). There is another type of Tsaddik who serves the blessed Creator but who is so very lowly in his own eyes that he thinks to himself, “Who am I that I should pray and annul the decree?” and therefore does not pray to do so.
Now even though Noah was a great and blameless tsaddik, he was very small in his own eyes and did not have faith that he was a powerful tsaddik with the ability to annul the decree of the flood. In fact, he thought of himself as being equal to the rest of his generation. He said, “If i am to be saved in the ark, and I am not more righteous than the rest of the generation, they too will be saved.” Therefore, he did not pray to save the people of his generation. This is what Rashi meant when he said he was of limited faith...
