
This sheet on Deuteronomy 25 was written by Avidan Freedman for 929 and can also be found here
The Jewish people don't seek to enter the land of Israel simply for the sake of national safe refuge. If that were the case, then when their conquest was finished and their borders secured, there would be no more need for war. But the Jewish national project is about an idea. After Moses has spent the last chapters detailing the practical application of this idea as a vision for society, Chapter 25 presents us with the antithesis of the vision- Amalek. When all the wars of conquest are finished, the Jews must wage a last battle of ideology, to eradicate the idea of Amalek from the world.
But this battle holds a deep paradox. Amalek's wickedness is epitomized by their tactic of attacking the weak and helpless at the margins of society. The ideal society outlined by Moshe is one defined, more than anything, by its empathy and caring, especially for the weakest members of society. It is a society of the highest standards of justice, but that justice is tempered by mercy when relating to the disadvantaged. So, on the one hand, it makes perfect sense that we need to completely eliminate the Amalekite ideology. But, how can we do that without compromising the values we're fighting for? How can we destroy Amalek- men, women, children- without becoming Amalek?
It could be that there is no real-world resolution to this paradox. In our first battle against Amalek, according to the Midrash, Joshua is told only to kill the strongest, to leave even the weaker soldiers alive. The values that animate the war win out over the need to fight it to the finish. When it's King Saul's turn, the instructions have changed, and no mercy is to be shown. Despite this, the Jews feel compelled to have mercy, but in the absence of guidelines allowing them to do so appropriately, their mercy is corrupted by self-interest. The weak and defenseless are slaughtered. They "have mercy" only on the booty, and Saul spares his fellow king.
Ultimately, historical circumstance and rabbinical sensibilities take the literal fulfillment of this command out of the realm of possibility, thus redeeming it from paradox. Stripped of its genocidal dimensions, the ideological battle against the oppression of the weak can, and must, remain a powerful element of our national project, an objective that we are commanded never to forget.
But this battle holds a deep paradox. Amalek's wickedness is epitomized by their tactic of attacking the weak and helpless at the margins of society. The ideal society outlined by Moshe is one defined, more than anything, by its empathy and caring, especially for the weakest members of society. It is a society of the highest standards of justice, but that justice is tempered by mercy when relating to the disadvantaged. So, on the one hand, it makes perfect sense that we need to completely eliminate the Amalekite ideology. But, how can we do that without compromising the values we're fighting for? How can we destroy Amalek- men, women, children- without becoming Amalek?
It could be that there is no real-world resolution to this paradox. In our first battle against Amalek, according to the Midrash, Joshua is told only to kill the strongest, to leave even the weaker soldiers alive. The values that animate the war win out over the need to fight it to the finish. When it's King Saul's turn, the instructions have changed, and no mercy is to be shown. Despite this, the Jews feel compelled to have mercy, but in the absence of guidelines allowing them to do so appropriately, their mercy is corrupted by self-interest. The weak and defenseless are slaughtered. They "have mercy" only on the booty, and Saul spares his fellow king.
Ultimately, historical circumstance and rabbinical sensibilities take the literal fulfillment of this command out of the realm of possibility, thus redeeming it from paradox. Stripped of its genocidal dimensions, the ideological battle against the oppression of the weak can, and must, remain a powerful element of our national project, an objective that we are commanded never to forget.
(יז) זָכ֕וֹר אֵ֛ת אֲשֶׁר־עָשָׂ֥ה לְךָ֖ עֲמָלֵ֑ק בַּדֶּ֖רֶךְ בְּצֵאתְכֶ֥ם מִמִּצְרָֽיִם׃
(17) Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey, after you left Egypt—
Rabbi Avidan Freedman is the Rabbi of Hevruta, the Shalom Hartman Institute's post high school program for Israelis and North Americans, and an educator in the institute's high school.
929 is the number of chapters in the Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible, the formative text of the Jewish heritage. It is also the name of a cutting-edge project dedicated to creating a global Jewish conversation anchored in the Hebrew Bible. 929 English invites Jews everywhere to read and study Tanakh, one chapter a day, Sunday through Thursday together with a website with creative readings and pluralistic interpretations, including audio and video, by a wide range of writers, artists, rabbis, educators, scholars, students and more. As an outgrowth of the web-based platform, 929 English also offers classes, pop-up lectures, events and across North America. We invite you to learn along with us and be part of our dynamic community.
To join 929's listserv for new and dynamic content each week click here
To join 929's listserv for new and dynamic content each week click here


