Chukkat open with the famous purification ritual of the red heifer which God instructs Moses and Aaron. Such an animal, with no blemish upon it, must be slaughtered and burned with cedar wood, hyssop and crimson, its ashes mixed with water and used for the purification of those who come into contact with a corpse. Paradoxically the ashes make ritually impure the ritually pure people who prepare them, and they must go outside the camp until night.
The Israelites arrived at the wilderness of Zin. Miriam, the sister of Moses and Aaron dies, and is buried at Kadesh. Once again there is a lack of water and the people complain against Moses and Aaron. God tells them to take a rod and to order the rock to yield water before the watching people, but Moses actually hits the rock twice. Water does gush out, but God is angry, seeing the action as a lack of belief. Moses and Aaron are told they will not enter the Land. The place where this happens is called Merivah, the waters of strife.
Aaron dies at Mount Hor on the border with the land of Edom. He is mourned by the children of Israel for 30 days and his son Eleazar succeeds him as high priest.
The Israelites go into battle at Hormah, but on the journey onwards they again complain about God and about the leadership of Moses. God sends a plague of nachashim seraphim (burning serpents) and many die; the plague is resolved only when Moses acts by making a bronze serpent/seraph figure, nachash nechoshet which heals the people when they look at it.
Again the Israelites go into battle, this time with Sihon the king of the Amorites, who refused to let them go through his land. After defeating him and taking his land, they go on to defeat Og the King of Bashan and also take possession of his country before marching on to Moab, right across the border from Jericho.
These statutes which are not susceptible to explanation are: The laws of Yevama – of a levirate marriage where a man is obliged to marry the childless widow of his deceased brother. (found in Deuteronomy 25:5-10). The laws of shaatnez, the mingling of kinds (Lev 19:19 and Deut 22:11) which prohibit an individual from wearing cloth that is made of both wool and linen in one garment, from interbreeding different species of animals, and from planting together of different kinds of seeds in the same area. The ritual of the scapegoat (Leviticus 16) where on Yom Kippur one goat would be laden with the sins of the people and sent out into the wilderness to Azazel, while another was offered to God, and the ritual that appears in this Chukkat, that of the Parah Adumah, the perfectly red heifer, the ashes of which will purify that is ritually impure
This is the language of Rashi from the words of our Rabbis.
And I did not understand this, as God did not tell Moses to make a snake but rather a "seraph", (a fiery flying serpent). Moses sought after the word's literal meaning, since it is in the way of the Torah, in all its doings, to have a miracle within a miracle. To remove damage with something harmful, or to cure an illness with disease.
It was proper for the Jews who were bitten by "seraph" snakes to not see snakes, and not remember, and not bring it upon their hearts in general. God's order to Moses to make the image of a seraph killed them. It is known that the "seraph" snakes have red eyes, wide heads, and bodies like brass necks. And therefore, Moses did not find a way to carry out this command of making a "seraph" without making a copper snake, since it is the form of a "seraph" snake. If he made it of another material, it would be in the form of a snake, but not of a "seraph". If this is so, why is it still called "the copper snake" (as opposed to the "seraph" snake)? Because even the name would do harm to people who would hear it and were bitten by the snakes.
The generalization goes as follows: God ordered that they be cured by a harmful, fatal thing in nature, and so Moses made its image and called it by that name. When a person would gaze at the copper snake (something usually completely harmful) intentionally, he would live and announce that God kills and God brings life.
...
The bronze serpent that heals those who look upon it seems to be an idolatry. But at the time it seemed to work, and the Talmud assumes that it worked because it diverted the thoughts of the people towards God. But by the time of Hezekiah that function had gone, it had become the object of idolatry and so Hezekiah broke it into pieces....
("saraf" also means "burned", which is the reason a venomous snake is called a "saraf")?
Bronze.
Therefore Moses made the Nachash Hanechoshet." (ie the important part of the serpent was that it looked burned or burning, as bronze appears to look
(Midrash Hagadol, Yemen 14th Century)
"Rabbi Yudin in the name of Rabbi Ayvo said: 'A wise man hears and adds a lesson (Mishlei, 1:5)' This is Moses. God told Moses, 'Make for yourself a saraf', and He did not elaborate. Moses said: If I make it out of gold then one sound does not fall upon (apply to) the other sound (ein lashon zeh nofel al lashon zeh). If I make it out of silver then one sound does not fall upon the other sound. Rather, I will make it out of bronze, one sound falling upon the other (Nachash Nechoshet).
ie the important part is that the thing to be made should look like a serpent. [Bereishit Rabbah 31:8]"
(the fiery serpent was both a reminder of the protection of God (ie burning snakes used to provide a fence around the camp) and of the snakes that were hurting them at that time - ie the punishment of God)
In Modern Hebrew, the verb ‘Le-Nachesh’ {לנחש} is used today meaning ‘to guess.’
The reason for this is probably connected to the usage of this verb in the Hebrew Bible in the context of telling the future by fortune tellers. Therefore, it is strongly associated with the concept of ‘guessing’…
Theory One: Bronze Age Canaanite Vestige
One explanation is that Nehushtan was a vestige of pre-Israelite practices. Iconographic evidence from Late Bronze Age Palestine shows an association between sacred trees and serpents as symbols of fertility.. a number of items discovered in several excavations in Israel dating to the Late Bronze Age (ca. 1550-1200 B.C.E… depict what appears to be a fertility goddess, perhaps Asherah, accompanied by serpent images……This suggests that the pre-Israelite/Canaanite population of Palestine venerated the serpent alongside the Asherah, most probably as an image of fertility. Thus, although as a rule serpent images disappear with the advent of the Iron Age and the Israelite culture, Nehushtan may have been an exception to this rule, a cultic image that stood in a Canaanite temple (perhaps in Jerusalem itself) and was inherited and kept by the Israelites.
Theory Two: Egyptian Influence in the 8th Century
Another possibility, if we focus on iconographic evidence, is that the statue reflects Egyptian culture. Serpents were seen by Egyptian rulers as symbols of life, healing, and protection. Deities and kings were often pictured with uraei (serpent heads) on their foreheads or otherwise pictured in association with protective uraei The image of a protective uraeus works well with the image of life and healing granted by looking at the serpent in the story in Numbers 21.
Although absent during the early Iron Age, serpent imagery reappears in the Levant on the seals and seal impressions dated to the reign of Hezekiah, during whose early reign the influence of Egypt was particularly strong.
..While Hezekiah himself seems to have preferred other Egyptian motifs, the winged sun disc with ankh (sign for life) or the winged scarab, other royal officials made use of the winged uraeus ( a representation of a sacred serpent as an emblem of supreme power, worn on the headdresses of ancient Egyptian deities and sovereigns. ). As the Judean rulers moved politically closer to Egypt to help stall the Assyrian advance that brought down the northern Kingdom of Israel in 722 B.C.E., it is not surprising that Egyptian iconography emerged as popular symbols in the royal court of Hezekiah.
Two bullae (seal or token) believed to date from late 8th century Judah that feature the winged uraeus (serpent). Each seems to have been the royal seal for a specific city named in the bulla. The one on the left reads: צעננם למלך (“Tza’ananim, belonging to the king”) and the one on the right reads פקה למלך (“[A]pheka, belonging to the king”). Both cities are mentioned in the Bible….Perhaps, then, the Nehushtan was introduced during this period, as part of Judah’s adoption of Egyptian cultural icons, especially the serpent image which was a symbol of kingship. In fact, this theory can work in tandem with the previous one: the serpent may have been an ancient vestige that gained importance in the time of Hezekiah when Egyptian iconography was on the rise. (From Torah.com)
The most reasonable solution to the puzzle of Nehushtan is that it was a pre-Israelite, Egyptian style cultic image of a serpent mounted on a sacred pole. For the Canaanites, it likely represented a deity with some relationship to the goddess Asherah, and was retained as part of the “cultic paraphernalia” of the worship of YHWH in Jerusalem. Sometime before the reign of Hezekiah in the 8th century B.C.E., an etiological tale was composed attributing the erection of Nehushtan to Moses during the wilderness wandering as a way of justifying this unusual cultic image.
Nehushtan likely became popular for a short time in the early days of Hezekiah, when he was in league with Egypt and even adopted Egyptian imagery on his personal seal. After Hezekiah submitted to Assyria, the Egyptian imagery became anathema and was removed from Judahite seals, and the statue of Nehushtan was removed as well. The fate of the image is unclear, but it may have become part of the booty or tribute that Hezekiah used to pay off his overlord, King Sennacherib of Assyria.
Hezekiah’s story was reimagined by the Deuteronomistic historian, composing and compiling his work in the glow of Josiah’s reform, and imagining Hezekiah as having engaged in a similar process. For that Deuteronomistic historian, the removal of a copper serpent would naturally have been seen as part of that reform. (torah.com)