Moshe never responds to Korah on Korah’s own terms. Korah wants Moshe to justify a claim that Moshe is better, but Moshe will not. Moshe’s concern is to demonstrate that he is intrinsically worthy. He devises a test to legitimate Aharon’s right to be the Kohen Gadol, by having all of the pretenders to the priesthood offer incense alongside Aharon. When God chooses Aharon in this test, the choice of Aharon will be vindicated. (Dena Weiss)
However, it seems more likely that Korach’s main transgression was the pursuit of kavod/honor, and so our Sages explained in Midrash Tanhuma (par.1): Elizaphan ben Uziel was appointed as Chieftain of the Kehatite families (Numbers 3:30). “Said Korach: my father was one of four sons; as it is written:(Exodus 6:18): ‘And the sons of Kehat: Amram and Yizhar, Hevron and Uziel’. Amram the firstborn – Aaron and his sons received the Priesthood and Moses his brother the Kingship. Who is worthy to become Chieftain – is it not the second son? And I, the son of Yizhar, was worthy to be Chieftain of my family, and he made the son of Uziel Chieftain!…Therefore, I will disagree [with Moses] and nullify everything done by him! This was the reason for the disagreement.” (David Golinkin)
(א) בֶּן זוֹמָא אוֹמֵר, אֵיזֶהוּ חָכָם, הַלּוֹמֵד מִכָּל אָדָם, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים קיט) מִכָּל מְלַמְּדַי הִשְׂכַּלְתִּי כִּי עֵדְוֹתֶיךָ שִׂיחָה לִּי. אֵיזֶהוּ גִבּוֹר, הַכּוֹבֵשׁ אֶת יִצְרוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (משלי טז) טוֹב אֶרֶךְ אַפַּיִם מִגִּבּוֹר וּמשֵׁל בְּרוּחוֹ מִלֹּכֵד עִיר. אֵיזֶהוּ עָשִׁיר, הַשָּׂמֵחַ בְּחֶלְקוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים קכח) יְגִיעַ כַּפֶּיךָ כִּי תֹאכֵל אַשְׁרֶיךָ וְטוֹב לָךְ. אַשְׁרֶיךָ, בָּעוֹלָם הַזֶּה. וְטוֹב לָךְ, לָעוֹלָם הַבָּא. אֵיזֶהוּ מְכֻבָּד, הַמְכַבֵּד אֶת הַבְּרִיּוֹת, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמואל א ב) כִּי מְכַבְּדַי אֲכַבֵּד וּבֹזַי יֵקָלּוּ:
(1) Ben Zoma said:Who is wise? He who learns from every man, as it is said: “From all who taught me have I gained understanding” (Psalms 119:99). Who is mighty? He who subdues his [evil] inclination, as it is said: “He that is slow to anger is better than the mighty; and he that rules his spirit than he that takes a city” (Proverbs 16:3). Who is rich? He who rejoices in his lot, as it is said: “You shall enjoy the fruit of your labors, you shall be happy and you shall prosper” (Psalms 128:2) “You shall be happy” in this world, “and you shall prosper” in the world to come. Who is he that is honored? He who honors his fellow human beings as it is said: “For I honor those that honor Me, but those who spurn Me shall be dishonored” (I Samuel 2:30).
Why does Moses have to say this to God? Does he think God WILL pay attention to Korach? Does he think Korach might have a case? Moses prayer reads as being both irritable and defensive. Does God reply?
Why the defence "I haven't taken anyone's donkey"? This is a battle about authority and leadership - the insertion of the donkey into the text seems curious.....
עדת קרח אין להם חלק לעולם הבא שנאמר (במדבר טז, לג) ותכס עליהם הארץ בעולם הזה ויאבדו מתוך הקהל לעולם הבא דברי ר"ע רבי אליעזר אומר עליהם אמר הכתוב (שמואל א ב, ו) ה' ממית ומחיה מוריד שאול ויעל: ת"ר עדת קרח אין להם חלק לעולם הבא שנאמר ותכס עליהם הארץ בעולם הזה ויאבדו מתוך הקהל לעולם הבא דברי רבי עקיבא רבי יהודה בן בתירא אומר הרי הן כאבידה המתבקשת שנאמר (תהלים קיט, קעו) תעיתי כשה אובד בקש עבדך כי מצותיך לא שכחתי: ויקח [קרח] אמר ריש לקיש שלקח מקח רע לעצמו קרח שנעשה קרחה בישראל בן יצהר בן שהרתיח עליו את כל העולם כצהרים בן קהת בן שהקהה שיני מולידיו בן לוי בן שנעשה לויה בגיהנם
(ו) עֲשָׂרָה דְבָרִים נִבְרְאוּ בְּעֶרֶב שַׁבָּת בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת, וְאֵלּוּ הֵן, פִּי הָאָרֶץ, וּפִי הַבְּאֵר, וּפִי הָאָתוֹן, וְהַקֶּשֶׁת, וְהַמָּן, וְהַמַּטֶּה, וְהַשָּׁמִיר, וְהַכְּתָב, וְהַמִּכְתָּב, וְהַלּוּחוֹת. וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים, אַף הַמַּזִּיקִין, וּקְבוּרָתוֹ שֶׁל משֶׁה, וְאֵילוֹ שֶׁל אַבְרָהָם אָבִינוּ. וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים, אַף צְבָת בִּצְבָת עֲשׂוּיָה:
(6) Ten things were created on the eve of the Sabbath at twilight, and these are they: [1] the mouth of the earth, [2] the mouth of the well, [3] the mouth of the donkey, [4] the rainbow, [5] the manna, [6] the staff [of Moses], [7] the shamir, [8] the letters, [9] the writing, [10] and the tablets. And some say: also the demons, the grave of Moses, and the ram of Abraham, our father. And some say: and also tongs, made with tongs.
The first rebellion is led by members of the tribe of Reuben along with Korach. Reuben was the eldest of Jacob’s sons so this faction are angry that they – descendants of the firstborn tribe – are not the leaders of the Jewish people. This rebellion is led by Korach, the Reubenite brothers Datan and Aviram, and another Reubenite named On ben Pelet.
The second rebellion is a challenge to the authority and power of the priests whose leader is Aaron. Even the Levites who hold power are angry – for within their already-privileged ranks, the family of Aaron enjoy yet higher status. This is an indirect attack on Moses, who gave his own brother the priesthood.
The first challengers to Moses’ authority are swallowed up by the Earth.
The second challengers to Aaron’s and the priests authority participate in a firepan showdown that results in the death of 250 people. (Zahavit Shalev)
רַב־לָכֶם֒ כִּ֤י כָל־הָֽעֵדָה֙ כֻּלָּ֣ם קְדֹשִׁ֔ים וּבְתוֹכָ֖ם יְהוָֹ֑ה וּמַדּ֥וּעַ תִּֽתְנַשְּׂא֖וּ עַל־קְהַ֥ל יְהוָֹֽה:
“Rav Lachem – you have taken on too much for yourselves, because all the community, ALL of them, are holy, and God is amongst them. So why do you raise yourself above the community of God?”
He has a point. Moses and Aaron have indeed taken on a lot for themselves; between them they hold the political, legal, military and the religious leadership. So while the men who joined the complaint of Korach are described as נְשִׂיאֵ֥י עֵדָ֛ה קְרִאֵ֥י מוֹעֵ֖ד אַנְשֵׁי־שֵֽׁם
“princes of the community, the elect of the assembly, men of renown” It is clear that they do not have anything like the power that they would like.
Moses seems to understand that their complaint has legitimacy. He falls on his face – and while no conversation with God is explicitly recorded, given his response in the following verse it seems that he must have been asking God how he should answer.
The problem is real. For Korach has spoken the truth – the whole community are holy – everyone is of equal value, and each has an equal right. So why are Moses and Aaron the unelected leadership over them?
At first sight it is hard to disagree with Korach and his men. All the people are holy, everyone has equal rights, and yet the leadership and the power is concentrated within one small group. Something is clearly wrong. And yet God is not on the side of the rebels. Indeed the rebels will ultimately be swallowed alive when the earth opens and closes over them. The punishment of this descent is in direct contrast to their aspiration to rise to the very top of the society. It alludes to the selfish motivation of the challengers – they are not asserting the equal rights of everyone in the community even if at first it appears that they are doing so, but they are using the language of equality to stage a coup only in order to achieve the leadership for themselves. The punishment will fit the crime – descent rather than ascent, separation rather than community.
The clues are there if you look. The very first sentence begins with a verb that has no object – And Korach took. וַיִּקַּ֣ח קֹ֔רַח
Korach is someone who takes for himself. He is not interested in the holiness nor the rights of the rest of the people except insofar as espousing them can help is own case. His is not a desire to do anything except achieve power. For Korach equal holiness does not lead to equality in the society, it is simply a pawn in an argument that will lead to him increasing his own power.
We can take a number of lessons from Korach. One is that speaking the language of equality is powerful, but the motivation behind the language matters. Sometimes the work we do for others is actually mainly helping ourselves, making ourselves feel useful or even superior because of the time and energy we put into this cause. Many an idea to improve the lot of others has become mired in the internal politics and jostling for place in the organisation.
Another is how we challenge established structures and speak truth to power. Words create and words destroy. We have to be continually mindful of just how we are challenging, and not to slide into a different place. How we challenge really matters.
And thirdly we must be aware of the privilege and entitlement with which we live. It is no accident that Korach and his men were leaders in the community, men of renown – they were the privileged and entitled who wanted more, who did not even notice how much they already had.
Korach spoke the truth but he didn’t care about it. He defended the holiness/rights of the whole community but only in order to take power for himself. And while Moses understood the truth of his words, he also came to understand the danger of his motivation, and the travesty of using those words in order not to fulfil them for others but to take power for himself.
We are living in a world where the Korachs are in the ascendant. The political rhetoric is all about destroying the elites and fighting for the little people, the ordinary people who have been left behind while the gap between rich and poor has grown exponentially. And yet rhetoric is all it is, as we see a new leadership consolidate its power, mouthing about taking back control for the masses while doing exactly the opposite. The story of Korach reminds us to look behind the language, to ascertain the motivation, to check the privilege and to notice the reality. As ever with bible, human nature does not change and we can see ourselves in the stories of our forbears.
Rabbi Sylvia Rothschild
November 2016 for Rene Cassin parashat hashavua 2017