Save "Love: Strong & Fierce as Death
"
Love: Strong & Fierce as Death

This sourcesheet and learning program is dedicated לעילוי נשמת בתשבע חיה בת נועם יגאל ורנה.

On Passover, we traditionally read Song of Songs, a composition ascribed to King Solomon. Traditional commentators see the love song as referring to the relationship between the Israelite nation and God, while modern scholars see it as having literary merit in its depiction of human love and relationships. Below please find one of the most compelling passages.

(ו) שִׂימֵ֨נִי כַֽחוֹתָ֜ם עַל־לִבֶּ֗ךָ כַּֽחוֹתָם֙ עַל־זְרוֹעֶ֔ךָ כִּֽי־עַזָּ֤ה כַמָּ֙וֶת֙ אַהֲבָ֔ה קָשָׁ֥ה כִשְׁא֖וֹל קִנְאָ֑ה רְשָׁפֶ֕יהָ רִשְׁפֵּ֕י אֵ֖שׁ שַׁלְהֶ֥בֶתְיָֽה׃

(6) Let me be a seal upon your heart, Like the seal upon your hand. For love is fierce as death, Passion is mighty as Sheol; Its darts are darts of fire, A blazing flame.

Questions to Consider

1. Why do you think the author chooses to compare the fierceness of love to death?

2. Similarly, why compare passion to Sheol (a term that means the grave or the underworld)?

3. What comparisons or similarities could be wrought between love and death?

Excerpt from 'The Song of Songs: A New Translation' by Ariel Bloch and Chana Bloch, pages 212-213
8:6 simeni ka-hotam 'al libeka...'al zero'eka, literally, "Set me as a seal upon your heart,...your arm." A seal on the heart and arm implies belonging, physical closeness, and intimacy. Seals or signets, made of metal or stone and often exquisitely engraved, were worn on the hand as a ring, higher up on the arm as an amulet, or on a cord around the neck, resting on the chest (Pope). A seal served as a form of identification, as in the story of Tamar and Judah (Gen. 38:18-26), and was numbered among a person's most precious possessions. Of deep symbolic significance, a seal stands for the owner's identity, honor, and fate; see Jer. 22:24, Hag. 2:23. For the weighty significance implied in placing an object of symbolic import on one's hand or heart, see Prov. 3:3, 6:21, 7:3, and Deut 6:8, 11:18. (the verses in Deuteronomy furnish the biblical basis for the wearing of phylacteries).
'azzah ka-mavet "as strong/ fierce as death." For 'az used specifically in the sense of "fierce," see Deut 28:50 'az panim "fierce of countenance" Judg. 14:18 'az me-'ari "more fierce than the lion" (rather than "more strong"; compare Prov 30:30, where the lion is proverbial for ferocity, not strength).
qasah ki-s'ol, literally, "hard/cruel as Sheol." Although Sheol is the personified netherworld in the biblical worldview (see Isa. 28:15, 18, Ps. 89:49, Hab. 2:5), the word is often used simply as a synonym for "death."
Excerpt from 'The Literary Guide to the Bible' by Robert Alter and Frank Kermode- essay on Song of Songs by Francis Landy, pages 317-318
As we have noted, the dominance and initiative of the Beloved are the poem's most astonishing characteristics. Metaphorically aligned with a feminine aspect of divinity, associated with the celestial bodies, the land, and fertility, the Beloved reverses the predominantly patriarchal theology of the Bible. Male political power is enthralled to her. The lovers live, however, in a patriarchal world; the Beloved suffers the humiliation that attends sexually adventurous women. She is cast out of her family (1:6), despised by shepherds (1:7), beaten by watchmen (5:7). The lovers can only find or imagine an enclosure, secluded from the world: a garden, a forest bed, or the poem itself. The poem is unfailingly critical of a society that does not know the true value of love and that imposes shame on lovers. The affirmation that love is as strong as death and is not quenched by the great floods (8:7), that it alone is not transient and illusory, is followed at once by the ironic comment: "if a man would give all the substance of his house for love, he [KJV: it] would utterly be condemned." In the eyes of the world, to give one's entire fortune for love is folly; from the perspective of the Song, in which riches are ultimately worthless, it is wisdom.

Questions to Consider

1. The love being described here is bound up with identity, honor and permanence. Which biblical and Jewish characters have evinced a love "strong as death?"

2. The contention made within the poem is that it would be worth it to give up everything for the sake of love- though society might not see it as such. Are there individuals we can look to as role models who did so?

Together we will seek to understand what the phrase "love is as fierce as death" means. We will look at examples of biblical, Talmudic and Jewish characters who have demonstrated a love "strong as death." We will consider what their example means to us, and also look into why these two concepts (love and death) are linked.

David & Jonathan
כָּל אַהֲבָה שֶׁהִיא תְלוּיָה בְדָבָר, בָּטֵל דָּבָר, בְּטֵלָה אַהֲבָה. וְשֶׁאֵינָהּ תְּלוּיָה בְדָבָר, אֵינָהּ בְּטֵלָה לְעוֹלָם. אֵיזוֹ הִיא אַהֲבָה הַתְּלוּיָה בְדָבָר, זוֹ אַהֲבַת אַמְנוֹן וְתָמָר. וְשֶׁאֵינָהּ תְּלוּיָה בְדָבָר, זוֹ אַהֲבַת דָּוִד וִיהוֹנָתָן:

All love that depends on something, [when the] thing ceases, [the] love ceases; and [all love] that does not depend on anything, will never cease. What is an example of love that depended on a something? Such was the love of Amnon for Tamar. And what is an example of love that did not depend on anything? Such was the love of David and Jonathan.

Questions to Consider

1. What are examples of things upon which love can depend?

2. Based on your knowledge of the Tamar and Amnon story (and if you do not recall it, we can refresh your memory), what was Amnon's love for Tamar dependent on?

3. Why is David and Jonathan a good model of a love that was independent of everything else?

(א) וַיְהִ֗י כְּכַלֹּתוֹ֙ לְדַבֵּ֣ר אֶל־שָׁא֔וּל וְנֶ֙פֶשׁ֙ יְה֣וֹנָתָ֔ן נִקְשְׁרָ֖ה בְּנֶ֣פֶשׁ דָּוִ֑ד ויאהבו [וַיֶּאֱהָבֵ֥הוּ] יְהוֹנָתָ֖ן כְּנַפְשֽׁוֹ׃

(1) When [David] finished speaking with Saul, Jonathan’s soul became bound up with the soul of David; Jonathan loved David as himself.

There is only one other place in Tanakh that has similar language. In that section, the love being described is that of a parent for their child- completely unconditional, unrestrained, boundless, limitless. Please see below.

(ל) וְעַתָּ֗ה כְּבֹאִי֙ אֶל־עַבְדְּךָ֣ אָבִ֔י וְהַנַּ֖עַר אֵינֶ֣נּוּ אִתָּ֑נוּ וְנַפְשׁ֖וֹ קְשׁוּרָ֥ה בְנַפְשֽׁוֹ׃

(30) “Now, if I come to your servant my father and the boy is not with us—since his own soul is so bound up with his

This may explain the lack of reciprocation from either party. Jacob loves Benjamin- with limitless, unconditional, boundless love- a love that could undo him or cause his death were Benjamin not to come home safely. Jonathan loves David in similar fashion. The text does not show that Benjamin or David, the recipients of that love, generate it in equal fashion- yes, they love, but their love is unlikely to be the kind that is "strong as death."

(ג) וַיִּכְרֹ֧ת יְהוֹנָתָ֛ן וְדָוִ֖ד בְּרִ֑ית בְּאַהֲבָת֥וֹ אֹת֖וֹ כְּנַפְשֽׁוֹ׃

(3) Jonathan and David made a pact, because [Jonathan] loved him as himself.

(א) וַיְדַבֵּ֣ר שָׁא֗וּל אֶל־יוֹנָתָ֤ן בְּנוֹ֙ וְאֶל־כָּל־עֲבָדָ֔יו לְהָמִ֖ית אֶת־דָּוִ֑ד וִיהֽוֹנָתָן֙ בֶּן־שָׁא֔וּל חָפֵ֥ץ בְּדָוִ֖ד מְאֹֽד׃ (ב) וַיַּגֵּ֤ד יְהוֹנָתָן֙ לְדָוִ֣ד לֵאמֹ֔ר מְבַקֵּ֛שׁ שָׁא֥וּל אָבִ֖י לַהֲמִיתֶ֑ךָ וְעַתָּה֙ הִשָּֽׁמֶר־נָ֣א בַבֹּ֔קֶר וְיָשַׁבְתָּ֥ בַסֵּ֖תֶר וְנַחְבֵּֽאתָ׃

(1) Saul urged his son Jonathan and all his courtiers to kill David. But Saul’s son Jonathan was very fond of David, (2) and Jonathan told David, “My father Saul is bent on killing you. Be on your guard tomorrow morning; get to a secret place and remain in hiding.

(ג) וַיִּשָּׁבַ֨ע ע֜וֹד דָּוִ֗ד וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ יָדֹ֨עַ יָדַ֜ע אָבִ֗יךָ כִּֽי־מָצָ֤אתִי חֵן֙ בְּעֵינֶ֔יךָ וַיֹּ֛אמֶר אַל־יֵֽדַע־זֹ֥את יְהוֹנָתָ֖ן פֶּן־יֵֽעָצֵ֑ב וְאוּלָ֗ם חַי־ה' וְחֵ֣י נַפְשֶׁ֔ךָ כִּ֣י כְפֶ֔שַׂע בֵּינִ֖י וּבֵ֥ין הַמָּֽוֶת׃

(3) David swore further, “Your father knows well that you are fond of me and has decided: Jonathan must not learn of this or he will be grieved. But, as the LORD lives and as you live, there is only a step between me and death.”

(יב) וַיֹּ֨אמֶר יְהוֹנָתָ֜ן אֶל־דָּוִ֗ד ה' אֱלֹקֵ֤י יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ כִּֽי־אֶחְקֹ֣ר אֶת־אָבִ֗י כָּעֵ֤ת ׀ מָחָר֙ הַשְּׁלִשִׁ֔ית וְהִנֵּה־ט֖וֹב אֶל־דָּוִ֑ד וְלֹֽא־אָז֙ אֶשְׁלַ֣ח אֵלֶ֔יךָ וְגָלִ֖יתִי אֶת־אָזְנֶֽךָ׃ (יג) כֹּֽה־יַעֲשֶׂה֩ ה' לִֽיהוֹנָתָ֜ן וְכֹ֣ה יֹסִ֗יף כִּֽי־יֵיטִ֨ב אֶל־אָבִ֤י אֶת־הָֽרָעָה֙ עָלֶ֔יךָ וְגָלִ֙יתִי֙ אֶת־אָזְנֶ֔ךָ וְשִׁלַּחְתִּ֖יךָ וְהָלַכְתָּ֣ לְשָׁל֑וֹם וִיהִ֤י ה' עִמָּ֔ךְ כַּאֲשֶׁ֥ר הָיָ֖ה עִם־אָבִֽי׃ (יד) וְלֹ֖א אִם־עוֹדֶ֣נִּי חָ֑י וְלֹֽא־תַעֲשֶׂ֧ה עִמָּדִ֛י חֶ֥סֶד ה' וְלֹ֥א אָמֽוּת׃ (טו) וְלֹֽא־תַכְרִ֧ת אֶֽת־חַסְדְּךָ֛ מֵעִ֥ם בֵּיתִ֖י עַד־עוֹלָ֑ם וְלֹ֗א בְּהַכְרִ֤ת ה' אֶת־אֹיְבֵ֣י דָוִ֔ד אִ֕ישׁ מֵעַ֖ל פְּנֵ֥י הָאֲדָמָֽה׃ (טז) וַיִּכְרֹ֥ת יְהוֹנָתָ֖ן עִם־בֵּ֣ית דָּוִ֑ד וּבִקֵּ֣שׁ ה' מִיַּ֖ד אֹיְבֵ֥י דָוִֽד׃ (יז) וַיּ֤וֹסֶף יְהֽוֹנָתָן֙ לְהַשְׁבִּ֣יעַ אֶת־דָּוִ֔ד בְּאַהֲבָת֖וֹ אֹת֑וֹ כִּֽי־אַהֲבַ֥ת נַפְשׁ֖וֹ אֲהֵבֽוֹ׃ (ס)

(12) Then Jonathan said to David, “By the LORD, the God of Israel! I will sound out my father at this time tomorrow, [or] on the third day; and if [his response] is favorable for David, I will send a message to you at once and disclose it to you. (13) But if my father intends to do you harm, may the LORD do thus to Jonathan and more if I do [not] disclose it to you and send you off to escape unharmed. May the LORD be with you, as He used to be with my father. (14) Nor shall you fail to show me the LORD’s faithfulness, while I am alive; nor, when I am dead, (15) shall you ever discontinue your faithfulness to my house—not even after the LORD has wiped out every one of David’s enemies from the face of the earth. (16) Thus has Jonathan covenanted with the house of David; and may the LORD requite the enemies of David!” (17) Jonathan, out of his love for David, adjured him again, for he loved him as himself.

Jonathan is the crown prince, destined to be king (well, not according to Samuel's prophecy, but it is unclear how well that prophecy is known). In choosing to shelter David and protect him from his father's wrath, he gives up the throne and even courts death- as demonstrated in the scene below.

(ל) וַיִּֽחַר־אַ֤ף שָׁאוּל֙ בִּיה֣וֹנָתָ֔ן וַיֹּ֣אמֶר ל֔וֹ בֶּֽן־נַעֲוַ֖ת הַמַּרְדּ֑וּת הֲל֣וֹא יָדַ֗עְתִּי כִּֽי־בֹחֵ֤ר אַתָּה֙ לְבֶן־יִשַׁ֔י לְבָ֨שְׁתְּךָ֔ וּלְבֹ֖שֶׁת עֶרְוַ֥ת אִמֶּֽךָ׃ (לא) כִּ֣י כָל־הַיָּמִ֗ים אֲשֶׁ֤ר בֶּן־יִשַׁי֙ חַ֣י עַל־הָאֲדָמָ֔ה לֹ֥א תִכּ֖וֹן אַתָּ֣ה וּמַלְכוּתֶ֑ךָ וְעַתָּ֗ה שְׁלַ֨ח וְקַ֤ח אֹתוֹ֙ אֵלַ֔י כִּ֥י בֶן־מָ֖וֶת הֽוּא׃ (ס) (לב) וַיַּ֙עַן֙ יְה֣וֹנָתָ֔ן אֶת־שָׁא֖וּל אָבִ֑יו וַיֹּ֧אמֶר אֵלָ֛יו לָ֥מָּה יוּמַ֖ת מֶ֥ה עָשָֽׂה׃ (לג) וַיָּ֨טֶל שָׁא֧וּל אֶֽת־הַחֲנִ֛ית עָלָ֖יו לְהַכֹּת֑וֹ וַיֵּ֙דַע֙ יְה֣וֹנָתָ֔ן כִּֽי־כָ֥לָה הִ֛יא מֵעִ֥ם אָבִ֖יו לְהָמִ֥ית אֶת־דָּוִֽד׃ (ס)

(30) Saul flew into a rage against Jonathan. “You son of a perverse, rebellious woman!” he shouted. “I know that you side with the son of Jesse—to your shame, and to the shame of your mother’s nakedness! (31) For as long as the son of Jesse lives on earth, neither you nor your kingship will be secure. Now then, have him brought to me, for he is marked for death.” (32) But Jonathan spoke up and said to his father, “Why should he be put to death? What has he done?” (33) At that, Saul threw his spear at him to strike him down; and Jonathan realized that his father was determined to do away with David.

Questions to Consider

1. What does Saul accuse Jonathan of in this scene?

2. What is Saul worried over (in terms of Jonathan)?

3. How does it follow that Saul should seek to throw his spear at Jonathan?

4. In what way, based on this scene, might one argue that Jonathan's love for David is "strong as death"?

Since Jonathan clearly does not envision a future where he is king, what *is* his plan?

(טז) וַיָּ֙קָם֙ יְהוֹנָתָ֣ן בֶּן־שָׁא֔וּל וַיֵּ֥לֶךְ אֶל־דָּוִ֖ד חֹ֑רְשָׁה וַיְחַזֵּ֥ק אֶת־יָד֖וֹ בֵּאלֹקִֽים׃ (יז) וַיֹּ֨אמֶר אֵלָ֜יו אַל־תִּירָ֗א כִּ֠י לֹ֤א תִֽמְצָאֲךָ֙ יַ֚ד שָׁא֣וּל אָבִ֔י וְאַתָּה֙ תִּמְלֹ֣ךְ עַל־יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וְאָנֹכִ֖י אֶֽהְיֶה־לְּךָ֣ לְמִשְׁנֶ֑ה וְגַם־שָׁא֥וּל אָבִ֖י יֹדֵ֥עַ כֵּֽן׃

(16) And Saul’s son Jonathan came to David at Horesh and encouraged him in [the name of] God. (17) He said to him, “Do not be afraid: the hand of my father Saul will never touch you. You are going to be king over Israel and I shall be second to you; and even my father Saul knows this is so.”

David & Absalom

(ה) וַיְצַ֣ו הַמֶּ֡לֶךְ אֶת־י֠וֹאָב וְאֶת־אֲבִישַׁ֤י וְאֶת־אִתַּי֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר לְאַט־לִ֖י לַנַּ֣עַר לְאַבְשָׁל֑וֹם וְכָל־הָעָ֣ם שָׁמְע֗וּ בְּצַוֺּ֥ת הַמֶּ֛לֶךְ אֶת־כָּל־הַשָּׂרִ֖ים עַל־דְּבַ֥ר אַבְשָׁלֽוֹם׃

(5) The king gave orders to Joab, Abishai, and Ittai: “Deal gently with my boy Absalom, for my sake.” All the troops heard the king give the order about Absalom to all the officers.

(א) וַיִּרְגַּ֣ז הַמֶּ֗לֶךְ וַיַּ֛עַל עַל־עֲלִיַּ֥ת הַשַּׁ֖עַר וַיֵּ֑בְךְּ וְכֹ֣ה ׀ אָמַ֣ר בְּלֶכְתּ֗וֹ בְּנִ֤י אַבְשָׁלוֹם֙ בְּנִ֣י בְנִ֣י אַבְשָׁל֔וֹם מִֽי־יִתֵּ֤ן מוּתִי֙ אֲנִ֣י תַחְתֶּ֔יךָ אַבְשָׁל֖וֹם בְּנִ֥י בְנִֽי׃ (ב) וַיֻּגַּ֖ד לְיוֹאָ֑ב הִנֵּ֨ה הַמֶּ֧לֶךְ בֹּכֶ֛ה וַיִּתְאַבֵּ֖ל עַל־אַבְשָׁלֹֽם׃ (ג) וַתְּהִ֨י הַתְּשֻׁעָ֜ה בַּיּ֥וֹם הַה֛וּא לְאֵ֖בֶל לְכָל־הָעָ֑ם כִּֽי־שָׁמַ֣ע הָעָ֗ם בַּיּ֤וֹם הַהוּא֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר נֶעֱצַ֥ב הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ עַל־בְּנֽוֹ׃ (ד) וַיִּתְגַּנֵּ֥ב הָעָ֛ם בַּיּ֥וֹם הַה֖וּא לָב֣וֹא הָעִ֑יר כַּאֲשֶׁ֣ר יִתְגַּנֵּ֗ב הָעָם֙ הַנִּכְלָמִ֔ים בְּנוּסָ֖ם בַּמִּלְחָמָֽה׃ (ה) וְהַמֶּ֙לֶךְ֙ לָאַ֣ט אֶת־פָּנָ֔יו וַיִּזְעַ֥ק הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ ק֣וֹל גָּד֑וֹל בְּנִי֙ אַבְשָׁל֔וֹם אַבְשָׁל֖וֹם בְּנִ֥י בְנִֽי׃ (ס) (ו) וַיָּבֹ֥א יוֹאָ֛ב אֶל־הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ הַבָּ֑יִת וַיֹּאמֶר֩ הֹבַ֨שְׁתָּ הַיּ֜וֹם אֶת־פְּנֵ֣י כָל־עֲבָדֶ֗יךָ הַֽמְמַלְּטִ֤ים אֶֽת־נַפְשְׁךָ֙ הַיּ֔וֹם וְאֵ֨ת נֶ֤פֶשׁ בָּנֶ֙יךָ֙ וּבְנֹתֶ֔יךָ וְנֶ֣פֶשׁ נָשֶׁ֔יךָ וְנֶ֖פֶשׁ פִּלַגְשֶֽׁיךָ׃ (ז) לְאַֽהֲבָה֙ אֶת־שֹׂ֣נְאֶ֔יךָ וְלִשְׂנֹ֖א אֶת־אֹהֲבֶ֑יךָ כִּ֣י ׀ הִגַּ֣דְתָּ הַיּ֗וֹם כִּ֣י אֵ֤ין לְךָ֙ שָׂרִ֣ים וַעֲבָדִ֔ים כִּ֣י ׀ יָדַ֣עְתִּי הַיּ֗וֹם כִּ֠י לא [ל֣וּ] אַבְשָׁל֥וֹם חַי֙ וְכֻלָּ֤נוּ הַיּוֹם֙ מֵתִ֔ים כִּי־אָ֖ז יָשָׁ֥ר בְּעֵינֶֽיךָ׃

(1) The king was shaken. He went up to the upper chamber of the gateway and wept, moaning these words as he went, “My son Absalom! O my son, my son Absalom! If only I had died instead of you! O Absalom, my son, my son!” (2) Joab was told that the king was weeping and mourning over Absalom. (3) And the victory that day was turned into mourning for all the troops, for that day the troops heard that the king was grieving over his son. (4) The troops stole into town that day like troops ashamed after running away in battle. (5) The king covered his face and the king kept crying aloud, “O my son Absalom! O Absalom, my son, my son!” (6) Joab came to the king in his quarters and said, “Today you have humiliated all your followers, who this day saved your life, and the lives of your sons and daughters, and the lives of your wives and concubines, (7) by showing love for those who hate you and hate for those who love you. For you have made clear today that the officers and men mean nothing to you. I am sure that if Absalom were alive today and the rest of us dead, you would have preferred it.

Questions to Consider

1. Absalom was the son who committed fratricide, killing his half-brother Amnon (who raped his sister, Tamar). He was exiled, tried to repair his relationship with his father, and eventually chose to rebel and take the crown by force. Given the fact that David had to flee before him, and Absalom slept with his father's concubines publicly, how can we understand David's inconsolable, inappropriate (in that the soldiers and officers are aware of it) grief over Absalom's death?

2. Joab is David's general, and he responds to David by giving him the verbal equivalent of a slap in the face- pull yourself together, for you clearly love those that hate you and hate those that love you. Is Joab right? In what way is he right or wrong?

3. How can this scene demonstrate the concept of "love as strong as death"?

(א) בני אבשלום וגו׳. אמרו רבותינו ז״ל (סוטה יב) שאמר שמונה פעמים בני, שבעה להעלותו משבעה מדורי גיהנם, והשמיני להביאו לגן עדן ולפי פשוטו: כן דרך המיללים לכפול דבריהם, כמו (ירמיהו ד יט): מעי מעי אוחילה:

My son Absalom. Our rabbis of blessed memory stated that he said "my son" eight times- seven times to lift him out of the seven levels of Gehinom and the eighth to bring him into Gan Eden. According to the peshat, this is the way of the lamenters, to double their language, like in Jeremiah 4:19 "My bowels, my bowels- I writhe in pain!"

(א) וכה אמר בלכתו בני אבשלום, רצה לומר שהגם שמרד ומרה, הוא בוכה עליו משתי טעמים, א. מפני שלא היה בדעתו להרוג את אביו, רק למלוך תחתיו, ועל זה אמר בני אבשלום בני בני אבשלום, רצה לומר היית בני לא כאכזר וזר להרגני, והיית בני בני, רצה לומר בני העקרי הראוי למלוך תחתי, ב. מפני שידע שמעשה זו נסבב על ידי חטאו ועל ידי יעוד הנביא, ועל זה אמר מי יתן מותי אני תחתיך לא אתה תחתי, ובזה החליט לאמר אבשלום בני בני הקדים שמו העצמי, כאילו היה צדיק מצד עצמו ונענש בעון אביו, וחכמינו זכרונם לברכה אמרו שאמר שמונה פעמים בני, להעלותו מז' מדורי גיהנם ולהביאו לגן עדן, ועל זה רמז במ"ש ויעל (פועל יוצא כמו מוריד שאול ויעל) שהעלהו משערי גיהנם בבכייתו:

And so he said as he went, "My son, Absalom" it wants to say that even though he rebelled and revolted, he [King David] cried over him for two reasons.

1. Because he did not believe that it was his [Absalom's] intention to kill his father, only to rule in his place, and due to this he said my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom, to indicate you were my son, not like a cruel person, strange and foreign to me to kill me, and you were "my son, my son", my main son who was worthy to rule in my place.

2. Because he knew that this matter came about due to his own sin and what the prophet [Nathan] had told him [see 2 Samuel 12:11-12], and therefore he asked if only I had died instead of you, and so he determined to say my son, my son Absalom- as though to indicate he [Absalom] were righteous of his own right and had been punished for the sin of his father. And our sages of blessed memory stated that he said the word "my son" eight times to bring him up out of the seven levels of Gehinnom and bring him to Gan Eden and this is hinted at by the phrasing - that he took him out of the depths of Gehinnom thorugh his weeping.

Questions to Consider

1. What does it mean for a father to raise his son's soul out of all the levels of Gehinnom, even knowing that son had rebelled against him and slept with all his concubines?

2. Does the Malbim resonate with you- do you think it is likely that David believed that Absalom was only punished due to his [David's] own faults?

Switching to a different perspective- another way of looking at love as being strong as death may have to do with the fact that *connections* between people whom one could plausibly argue were beloved of one another (though the text does not use this wording) continue AFTER death. The Gemara has fascinating tales about the interactions between fathers and sons/ students and teachers after death. Here are some.

Connections Beyond Death- Talmud
א"ל ליתחזי לי מר אתחזי ליה א"ל ה"ל למר צערא א"ל כמישחל בניתא מחלבא ואי אמר לי הקב"ה זיל בההוא עלמא כד הוית לא בעינא דנפיש בעיתותיה

Rava said to Rav Naḥman: Master, appear to me in a dream after your death. And he appeared to him. Rava said to him: Master, did you have pain in death? Rav Naḥman said to him: Like the removal of hair from milk, which is a most gentle process. But nevertheless, were the Holy One, Blessed be He, to say to me: Go back to that world, the physical world, as you were, I would not want to go, for the fear of the Angel of Death is great. And I would not want to go through such a terrifying experience a second time.

Questions to Consider

1. Why do you think Rava wanted Rav Nachman to appear to him after death?

2. What is comforting about the way that Rav Nachman describes death?

3. Why would Rav Nachman not want to live in the physical world again?

תָּא שְׁמַע: דַּאֲבוּהּ דִּשְׁמוּאֵל הֲווֹ קָא מַפְקְדִי גַּבֵּיהּ זוּזֵי דְיַתְמֵי. כִּי נָח נַפְשֵׁיהּ לָא הֲוָה שְׁמוּאֵל גַּבֵּיהּ. הֲווֹ קָא קָרוּ לֵיהּ: ״בַּר אָכֵיל זוּזֵי דְיַתְמֵי״. אֲזַל אַבָּתְרֵיהּ לַחֲצַר מָוֶת. אֲמַר לְהוּ: בָּעֵינָא אַבָּא! אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ: אַבָּא טוּבָא אִיכָּא הָכָא. אֲמַר לְהוּ: בָּעֵינָא אַבָּא בַּר אַבָּא. אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ: אַבָּא בַּר אַבָּא נָמֵי טוּבָא אִיכָּא הָכָא. אֲמַר לְהוּ: בָּעֵינָא אַבָּא בַּר אַבָּא אֲבוּהּ דִּשְׁמוּאֵל הֵיכָא? אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ סְלֵיק לִמְתִיבְתָּא דִּרְקִיעָא. אַדְּהָכִי חַזְיֵיהּ לְלֵוִי דְּיָתֵיב אַבָּרַאי. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אַמַּאי יָתְבַתְּ אַבָּרַאי? מַאי טַעְמָא לָא סָלְקַתְּ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ, דְאָמְרִי לִי: כָּל כִּי הָנָךְ שְׁנֵי דְּלָא סְלֵיקְתְּ לִמְתִיבְתָּא דְּרַבִּי אַפָּס וְאַחְלֵישְׁתֵּיהּ לְדַעְתֵּיהּ, לָא מְעַיְּילִינַן לָךְ לִמְתִיבְתָּא דִרְקִיעָא.

אַדְּהָכִי וְהָכִי אֲתָא אֲבוּהּ, חַזְיֵיהּ דַּהֲוָה קָא בָכֵי וְאַחֵיךְ. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מַאי טַעְמָא קָא בָכֵית? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: דְּלַעֲגָל קָא אָתֵית. מַאי טַעְמָא אַחֵיכְתְּ? דַּחֲשִׁיבַתְּ בְּהַאי עָלְמָא טוּבָא. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אִי חֲשִׁיבְנָא — נְעַיְּילוּהּ לְלֵוִי. וְעַיְּילוּהוּ לְלֵוִי.

אֲמַר לֵיהּ: זוּזֵי דְיַתְמֵי הֵיכָא? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: זִיל שַׁקְלִינְהוּ בְּאַמְתָא דְרִחְיָא. עִילָּאֵי וְתַתָּאֵי — דִּידַן, וּמִיצְעֵי דְּיַתְמֵי. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מַאי טַעְמָא עֲבַדְתְּ הָכִי? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: אִי גָּנְבִי גַּנָּבֵי — מִגַּנְבוּ מִדִּידַן. אִי אָכְלָה אַרְעָא — אָכְלָה מִדִּידַן.

The Gemara cites another proof: Come and hear, as it is told: They would deposit the money of orphans with Shmuel’s father for safekeeping. When Shmuel’s father died, Shmuel was not with him, and did not learn from him the location of the money. Since he did not return it, Shmuel was called: Son of him who consumes the money of orphans. Shmuel went after his father to the cemetery and said to the dead: I want Abba. The dead said to him: There are many Abbas here. He told them: I want Abba bar Abba. They said to him: There are also many people named Abba bar Abba here. He told them: I want Abba bar Abba, the father of Shmuel. Where is he? They replied: Ascend to the yeshiva on high. Meanwhile, he saw his friend Levi sitting outside the yeshiva, away from the rest of the deceased. He asked him: Why do you sit outside? Why did you not ascend to the yeshiva? He replied: Because they tell me that for all those years that you didn’t enter the yeshiva of Rabbi Afes, and thereby upset him, we will not grant you entry to the yeshiva on high.

Meanwhile, Shmuel’s father came and Shmuel saw that he was crying and laughing. Shmuel said to his father: Why are you crying? His father replied: Because you will come here soon. Shmuel continued and asked: Why are you laughing? His father replied: Because you are extremely important in this world. Shmuel said to him: If I am important, then let them grant Levi entry to the yeshiva. And so it was that they granted Levi entry to the yeshiva.

Shmuel said to his father: Where is the orphans’ money? He said to him: Go and retrieve it from the millhouse, where you will find the uppermost and the lowermost money is ours, and the money in the middle belongs to the orphans. Shmuel said to him: Why did you do that? He replied: If thieves stole, they would steal from our money on top, which the thief would see first. If the earth swallowed up any of it, it would swallow from our money, on the bottom.

Questions to Consider

1. What derogatory title was Shmuel called?

2. How did Shmuel reach out to his dead father?

3. Why was Shmuel's father crying and laughing?

4. Where was the money that belonged to the orphans?

5. How did this help clear Shmuel's name?

6. What might this show about the strength of love - and why love might be compared, in its strength, to death? Perhaps even that love can be *stronger* than death?

Love and Death as Linked

Another way to look at the phrase "Love is strong as death" is to see love and death on a continuum. See the excerpt from Out of the Whirlwind: Essays on Mourning, Suffering and the Human Condition by Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik below.

Out of the Whirlwind: Essays on Mourning, Suffering and the Human Condition by Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, pages 193-194
With regard to the institution of marriage, Judaism was always aware of the paradox involved in this sacred union of two strangers. The drive for matrimonial companionship is, among many other factors, enhanced also by the human experience of our tragic destiny, which ends in death. There is no doubt that the drive for procreation is basically the desire for perpetuation of our own finite existence. The longing for a child is basically the outcry of a lonely soul groping in the dark for salvation and eternal life, and finding instead the wet and dreary fall to the grave. In the marriage event, the critical emotional awareness sees the tragedy of human destiny. It drives two strangers to unite in order to combat a dreaded fiend- death. In the midst of carefree and unrestrained merrymaking and jubilation, the vision of the loneliness of man is beheld. The antithesis of joy emerges from the peripheral distance. Thus Rabbi Hamnuna Zuti's words at the wedding celebration, "Woe unto us, for we are to die."
This paradoxical awareness is symbolized by the breaking of the glass under the canopy. Regarding the above-cited talmudic passage, Tosafot comment: "From here they were accustomed to shatter glass at weddings" (Berakhot 31a, s.v. aytei).

Questions to Consider

1. What is the relationship Rav Soloveitchik posits between love and death?

2. Why, according to this view, do people marry or procreate?

3. Why then might it make sense to equate the fierceness of love with the fierceness of death?

A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning
BY JOHN DONNE
As virtuous men pass mildly away,
And whisper to their souls to go,
Whilst some of their sad friends do say
The breath goes now, and some say, No:
So let us melt, and make no noise,
No tear-floods, nor sigh-tempests move;
'Twere profanation of our joys
To tell the laity our love.
Moving of th' earth brings harms and fears,
Men reckon what it did, and meant;
But trepidation of the spheres,
Though greater far, is innocent.
Dull sublunary lovers' love
(Whose soul is sense) cannot admit
Absence, because it doth remove
Those things which elemented it.
But we by a love so much refined,
That our selves know not what it is,
Inter-assured of the mind,
Care less, eyes, lips, and hands to miss.
Our two souls therefore, which are one,
Though I must go, endure not yet
A breach, but an expansion,
Like gold to airy thinness beat.
If they be two, they are two so
As stiff twin compasses are two;
Thy soul, the fixed foot, makes no show
To move, but doth, if the other do.
And though it in the center sit,
Yet when the other far doth roam,
It leans and hearkens after it,
And grows erect, as that comes home.
Such wilt thou be to me, who must,
Like th' other foot, obliquely run;
Thy firmness makes my circle just,
And makes me end where I begun.

Questions to Consider

1. Donne uses death in his poem about love. To what end? How does he use it?

2. What does Donne mean when he says that though he and his lover are in different places, they experience not a "breach, but an expansion?"

3. How does the metaphor of a compass (the drawing tool) come into play here?

4. How might this poem shed light on the idea of linking love and death, and suggesting love is as strong as death?

Excerpt from Positivity Bias: Practical Wisdom for Positive Living Inspired by the Life and Teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe by Mendel Kalmenson, pages 321-322
Eternal Connection
Throughout his correspondence with those in mourning, the Rebbe insisted that there remains an ongoing, spiritual connection between the living and the deceased, and that this relationship is not merely theoretical- it is also tangible. In fact, it is a dynamic relationship that can be developed and enhanced.
In a letter written to a war widow, the Rebbe writes:
"The ties between two people, and certainly those between a husband and wife or between parents and children, are chiefly of a spiritual, not of a material, nature. That means that a bullet, a grenade, or a disease can affect the body, but not the spirit or the soul. The physical bond between two persons can be broken...but not their spiritual relationship."
The Rebbe's teachings in this regard come to life in the following story, related by R. Nachum Rabinowitz, a Chasid from Jerusalem. He was once waiting for a private audience with the Rebbe. Among those waiting with him was a man, obviously wealthy, who looked utterly despondent. But when the man emerged from the Rebbe's room, he looked like a different person; his face radiated vitality and optimism.
Curious about this radical change of mood, Rabbi Rabinowitz inquired about the man's identity from the Rebbe's secretaries and arranged to see him. When the two men met, Rabbi Rabinowitz asked if the man could share with hin what had transpired in the Rebbe's rom.
"Recently," the man related, "my only son died. At that point, I felt that my life no longer had any purpose. I saw no value in my wealth and status. I went to see the Rebbe in search of consolation and advice. The Rebbe asked me what my feelings would be if my son went overseas and were living in a foreign country from which he could not communicate with me; however, I could be assured that all his needs were being met and that he wasn't suffering at all. I answered that, although the separation would be difficult to bear, I would be happy for my son."
The Rebbe continued: "And although he could not respond, if you could communicate to him and send him packages, would you do so?"
The man answered, "Of course."
"This is precisely your present situation," the Rebbe concluded. "With every prayer you recite, you are sending a message to your son. And with every gift you make to charity or institution you fund, you are sending a 'package' to him. He cannot respond, but he appreciates your words and your gifts."

TAKEAWAYS

Today we explored the phrase "love is as fierce as death" originating in Song of Songs. We did this through looking at:

  • David and Jonathan- Jonathan literally faced death because of his love for David
  • David and Absalom- David wished that he had died in lieu of his son
  • Talmudic Stories- In which students and masters/ parents and children persisted in their connection even when one had died (it seems as though their love outlasted death).
  • The link between concepts- There may be a love/ death continuum where one fights against death through love, and also recognizes that when the beloved one dies, it can be perceived as an expansion, not a breach. Indeed, the Lubavitcher Rebbe sees our actions towards those who have died as reflecting our love- we send them care 'packages' comprised of our actions in their name.

There is a permanence to deep love that is as strong and lasting as death. Death feels like an ending, but it isn't one- because love is as strong, if not stronger, than death.