Save "Why Rice Should Be Allowed on Pesach"
Why Rice Should Be Allowed on Pesach

(טו) שִׁבְעַ֤ת יָמִים֙ מַצּ֣וֹת תֹּאכֵ֔לוּ אַ֚ךְ בַּיּ֣וֹם הָרִאשׁ֔וֹן תַּשְׁבִּ֥יתוּ שְּׂאֹ֖ר מִבָּתֵּיכֶ֑ם כִּ֣י ׀ כָּל־אֹכֵ֣ל חָמֵ֗ץ וְנִכְרְתָ֞ה הַנֶּ֤פֶשׁ הַהִוא֙ מִיִּשְׂרָאֵ֔ל מִיּ֥וֹם הָרִאשֹׁ֖ן עַד־י֥וֹם הַשְּׁבִעִֽי׃

(15) Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread; on the very first day you shall remove leaven from your houses, for whoever eats leavened bread from the first day to the seventh day, that person shall be cut off from Israel.

Over the past millennium, the custom developed in Ashkenazic communities to refrain from eating kitniyot, certain legumes, on Pesach. We will base our discussion in part on an essay by Rav Yehudah Pris of Yeshivat Birkat Moshe (Maaleh Adumim) in Techumin (13:163-180).

(ה) אלו דברים שאדם יוצא בהן ידי חובתו בפסח: בחטים, בשעורים, בכסמין ובשיפון ובשבלת שועל.

(5) These are the [grains] with which a person may discharge his [obligation to eat matzah] on Passover: with wheat, with barley, with spelt, and with rye, and with oats.

The Torah forbids us to eat chametz (leaven) on Pesach. Something becomes chametz when flour and water mix together long enough for the dough to rise. The Mishnah (Pesachim 35a) rules that chametz can be produced only from certain grains: wheat, barley, rye, spelt, and oats.1Some question exists regarding the identification of the Gemara's "shibolet shu'al" as oats. Rav Yosef Efrati (Mesorah 13:66-71) notes Professor Yehudah Felix's claim that shibolet shu'al could not possibly be oats, and Rav Efrati vigorously disputes this claim. He cites Rav Yosef Shalom Eliashiv as supporting the view that shibolet shu'al is undoubtedly oats (the view accepted by almost all Rishonim). Ezra Frazer reports that Rav Aharon Lichtenstein does not flatly reject Professor Felix's claims, but he believes that one should continue to treat oats as shibolet shu'al, absent absolute proof that shibolet shu'al is something else. Rav Hershel Schachter has told this author that in case of great need one may use oat matzah at the Pesach seder. In general, Rav Schachter wrote this author that one should try to eat other mezonot foods together with oat products to avoid any doubt regarding the berachot before and after oats.
Millet and rice are not included in this list, explains the Mishnah, because they spoil and do not ferment. However, Rabi Yochanan Ben Nuri includes rice in the list of grains that can potentially become chametz. The Gemara (Pesachim 114b) states that Rabi Yochanan Ben Nuri is a lone authority concerning this topic. The Rishonim therefore rule in accordance with the majority view, which contends that rice cannot become chametz. The Rambam, for example, writes (Hilchot Chametz U'matzah 5:1):

אמר רב אשי שמע מינה דרב הונא לית דחייש להא דרבי יוחנן בן נורי דתניא רבי יוחנן בן נורי אומר אורז מין דגן הוא וחייבין על חימוצו כרת ואדם יוצא בו ידי חובתו בפסח.

Rav Ashi said: From Rav Huna you may infer that none pay heed to the following [ruling] of Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri. For it was taught, Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri said: "Rice is a species of grain and [a person shall be] cut off for [eating it in] its leavened state, and a person may discharge his [obligation to eat matzah] with it on Passover."

The Rif omits the opinion of Rabi Yochanan Ben Nuri, indicating his acceptance of the majority view as the actual Halachah. Similarly, the Rosh (Pesachim 2:12), Baal Hamaor (Pesachim 26b in Rif's pages), and Ritva (Pesachim 35a s.v. Hanei) all rule in accordance with the majority view.
There is no prohibition regarding chametz except with respect to the five categories of grain. There are two types of wheat... and three types of barley... but kitniyot such as rice... and the like are not included in the prohibition of chametz. Even if one were to knead rice flour... with hot water and cover it with a cloth until it rises like fermented dough, it may still be eaten on Pesach, for it is not chametz; instead it is sirachon (decay).2See Techumin (1:97), where Dr. B.P. Munk discusses the chemical difference between chimutz and sirachon.
עברית

So what's the deal with Kitniyot? Why do we say they're not allowed?

Regarding kitniyot, such as rice and beans, our rabbis have the practice not to eat them on Pesach. I believe that I have heard that one should not cook them on Pesach, besides in boiling water from the moment they are placed in the pot [this is what the Gemara calls chalitah -H.J.]. Many great rabbis are lenient concerning this issue, but it appears very difficult to permit something when the common practice to be strict dates back to the early ages. It is reasonable to say that this stringency did not emerge as a concern for [kitniyot being actual] chametz, because they would not err on matters familiar even to the youngest of students, and the Gemara explicitly states that only the five species of grain have the potential to become chametz... Rather, the reason is an edict to prevent violation of Torah law, since kitniyot are cooked in a manner similar to the way that grains are cooked. Had we permitted kitniyot, one could have easily become confused [with chametz], because they are cooked similarly... In addition, in many locales, kitniyot are made into bread, and people who are not well versed in Torah laws might become confused. This is not at all similar to vegetables, which are clearly distinguishable from the five grains. It is a proper minhag (custom) to refrain from eating all kitniyot, including mustard seed, because of their similarity to grain. Although the Talmud (Pesachim 114b) specifically permits rice, this rule applied only in Talmudic times, when all were well versed in Halachah. However, today we should certainly follow the decree that we mentioned... and even to put kitniyot in boiling hot water should be forbidden, because one might become confused and permit placing them in cold water.
The Beit Yosef (Orach Chaim 453) cites a different concern (which appears later in the Smak) - that kitniyot are mixed with grains that have the ability to become chametz. The Ritva (Pesachim 35a s.v. Tana) alludes to this concern:
One must carefully inspect [kitniyot, such as rice,] because spelt is constantly mixed with rice... Many pious individuals avoid eating these species on Pesach if they were cooked, due to concerns regarding these mixtures.

רבינו ירוחם - תולדות אדם וחוה נתיב ה חלק ג דף מא טור א:

ואותם שנהגו שלא לאכול אורז ומיני קטנית מבושל בפסח מנהג שטות הוא זולתי אם הם עושין להחמיר על עצמן ולא ידעתי למה.

Rabbenu Yerucham (Provence, 14th Century) - Toldot Adam VeChava, Path 5, Section 3, Page 101, Column 1

Those who are accustomed to not eat cooked rice and beans on Passover, this is a foolish custom, unless they do so to be stringent, and I do not know why.

Eating Kitniyot (Legumes) on Pesach (English Summary)
Rabbi David Golinkin - responsafortoday.com/engsums/3_4.htm
Hebrew teshuvah - responsafortoday.com/vol3/4.pdf
Article in Voices of Conservative/Masorti Judaism - cjvoices.org/article/the-kitniyot-dilemma
[T]here are many good reasons to do away with this "foolish custom": a) It detracts from the joy of the holiday by limiting the number of permitted foods; b) It causes exorbitant price rises, which result in "major financial loss" and, as is well known, "the Torah takes pity on the people of Israel's money"; c) It emphasizes the insignificant (legumes) and ignores the significant (hametz, which is forbidden from the five kinds of grain); d) It causes people to scoff at the commandments in general and at the prohibition of hametz in particular - if this custom has no purpose and is observed, then there is no reason to observe other commandments; e) Finally, it causes unnecessary divisions between Israel's different ethnic groups. On the other hand, there is only one reason to observe this custom: the desire to preserve an old custom. Obviously, this desire does not override all that was mentioned above. Therefore, both Ashkenazim and Sephardim are permitted to eat legumes and rice on Pesah without fear of transgressing any prohibition.