יֵשׁ חוּפָּה לִפְסוּלוֹת וּשְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר אֵין חוּפָּה לִפְסוּלוֹת There is significance to a priest entering a wedding canopy with women who are unfit to marry a priest. If a priest’s daughter who is unfit to marry a priest enters the wedding canopy with a priest, she becomes disqualified from partaking of teruma from her father’s household. This is the case even if the priest did not betroth her and they did not engage in sexual intercourse. And Shmuel said: There is no significance to a priest entering the wedding canopy with women who are unfit to marry a priest. Only sexual intercourse disqualifies her from the privileges of priesthood.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל וּמוֹדֶה לִי אַבָּא בְּתִינוֹקֶת פְּחוּתָה מִבַּת שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים וְיוֹם אֶחָד הוֹאִיל וְאֵין לָהּ בִּיאָה אֵין לָהּ חוּפָּה Shmuel said: And Abba, i.e., Rav, whose first name was Abba, concedes to me, with regard to a girl less than three years and one day old, that she is not disqualified by merely entering the wedding canopy. Since there is no legal significance to an act of intercourse with her, there is no legal significance to entering the wedding canopy with her.
אָמַר רָבָא אַף אֲנַן נָמֵי תְּנֵינָא בַּת שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים וְיוֹם אֶחָד מִתְקַדֶּשֶׁת בְּבִיאָה וְאִם בָּא עָלֶיהָ יָבָם קְנָאָהּ וְחַיָּיבִין עָלֶיהָ מִשּׁוּם אֵשֶׁת אִישׁ וּמְטַמְּאָה אֶת בּוֹעֲלָהּ לְטַמֵּא מִשְׁכָּב תַּחְתּוֹן כְּעֶלְיוֹן Rava said: We, too, learn in the following baraita that there is no legal significance to an act of intercourse with a girl less than three years old: A girl three years and one day old can be betrothed via sexual intercourse; and if she was a yevama and her yavam had intercourse with her, he has acquired her; and a man who has intercourse with her while she is married to someone else is liable on her account because of the prohibition of intercourse with a married woman; and if she experiences a menstrual discharge she renders ritually impure a man who has intercourse with her, so that he renders impure the object upon which he lies like the upper one.
נִשֵּׂאת לְכֹהֵן אוֹכֶלֶת בִּתְרוּמָה בָּא עָלֶיהָ אֶחָד מִכׇּל הַפְּסוּלִין פְּסָלָהּ If she is married to a priest she may partake of teruma. If one of those who render women unfit for marrying a priest had intercourse with her, he has disqualified her from being able to partake of teruma.
בַּת שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים וְיוֹם אֶחָד הוּא דְּמִפַּסְלָה בְּבִיאָה מִפַּסְלָה בְּחוּפָּה הָא פְּחוּתָה מִבַּת שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים וְיוֹם אֶחָד דְּלָא מִפַּסְלָה בְּבִיאָה לָא מִפַּסְלָה נָמֵי בְּחוּפָּה שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ Rava infers from this baraita that it is a girl three years and one day old who is disqualified via intercourse, and consequently she is also disqualified via the wedding canopy. However, a girl who is less than three years and one day old, who is not disqualified via intercourse, is also not disqualified via the wedding canopy. The Gemara concludes: Indeed, learn from this that it is so.
אָמַר רָמֵי בַּר חָמָא יֵשׁ חוּפָּה לִפְסוּלוֹת בָּאנוּ לְמַחְלוֹקֶת רַבִּי מֵאִיר וְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן Rami bar Ḥama said: With regard to the question of whether there is legal significance to a priest entering the wedding canopy with women who are unfit to marry a priest, we have arrived at the dispute cited in the mishna between Rabbi Meir on the one hand and Rabbi Elazar and Rabbi Shimon on the other.