Parashat Matot: What Is Greater - The Jew Or The Mitsvah?
(ג) אִישׁ֩ כִּֽי־יִדֹּ֨ר נֶ֜דֶר לַֽיהוָ֗ה אֽוֹ־הִשָּׁ֤בַע שְׁבֻעָה֙ לֶאְסֹ֤ר אִסָּר֙ עַל־נַפְשׁ֔וֹ לֹ֥א יַחֵ֖ל דְּבָר֑וֹ כְּכָל־הַיֹּצֵ֥א מִפִּ֖יו יַעֲשֶֽׂה׃
(3) If a man makes a vow to the LORD or takes an oath imposing an obligation on himself, he shall not break his pledge; he must carry out all that has crossed his lips.

In Parashat Matot, we read about the nullification of vows. In the Mishnah's tractates of Nedarim and Shevuot, as well as the Talmud, we further read several interpretations of different types of promises: a vow (נֶדֶר, neder), and an oath (שְׁבֻעָה, shevuah) for example.

The Man Of Emet

Specifically, in the Baraita, we learn that a Sage could annul a vow retroactively. This is because a person at such an elevated level speaks only "emet" (truth). Thus, what he says becomes true. Take Eliyahu HaNavi for example:

(א) וַיֹּאמֶר֩ אֵלִיָּ֨הוּ הַתִּשְׁבִּ֜י מִתֹּשָׁבֵ֣י גִלְעָד֮ אֶל־אַחְאָב֒ חַי־יְהוָ֞ה אֱלֹהֵ֤י יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָמַ֣דְתִּי לְפָנָ֔יו אִם־יִהְיֶ֛ה הַשָּׁנִ֥ים הָאֵ֖לֶּה טַ֣ל וּמָטָ֑ר כִּ֖י אִם־לְפִ֥י דְבָרִֽי׃ (ס)
(1) Elijah the Tishbite, an inhabitant of Gilead, said to Ahab, “As the LORD lives, the God of Israel whom I serve, there will be no dew or rain except at my bidding.”

We later read that it did not rain in Erets Yisrael for three and a half years on account of Eliyahu's word. Furthermore, we see in the very same chapter the following statement from a widow he later helps:

(כד) וַתֹּ֤אמֶר הָֽאִשָּׁה֙ אֶל־אֵ֣לִיָּ֔הוּ עַתָּה֙ זֶ֣ה יָדַ֔עְתִּי כִּ֛י אִ֥ישׁ אֱלֹהִ֖ים אָ֑תָּה וּדְבַר־יְהוָ֥ה בְּפִ֖יךָ אֱמֶֽת׃ (פ)
(24) And the woman answered Elijah, “Now I know that you are a man of God and that the word of the LORD is truly in your mouth.”

What Is Greater: The Jew Or The Mitsvah?

The Halachic position whether or not a person's vow is binding offers several scenarios. I will explain two of these:

1. If a person says, "I am forbidden from observing Shabbat", it is an invalid oath. The reason being an oath cannot cancel another oath, since we, Yisrael, swore an oath to observe Shabbat (along with the entire Torah) at Mount Sinai.

2. However, if a person says, "Shabbat is forbidden to me", it remains a valid vow. In this instance, only a "Beit Din" (rabbinical court) can annul the said vow. Needless to say, such a vow would in theory only harm a person's well-being regardless.

So, what's the difference between the two?

The reason for this difference is because in the first instance the person forbids "themself", whereas, in the second instance, they forbid the "action" itself. Allow me to elaborate.

A person can be a "rasha" (wicked person) today, and a "tsadik" (righteous person) tomorrow. Who we are changes with every passing moment (hopefully for the better). Thus forbidding oneself, is logically more lenient.

In contrast, forbidding an action is correctly binding as the action itself cannot change as it is independent of the person. Thus, in the second instance, this requires more stringency to annul.

The Beginning, Middle, And End

(כד) מוֹצָ֥א שְׂפָתֶ֖יךָ תִּשְׁמֹ֣ר וְעָשִׂ֑יתָ כַּאֲשֶׁ֨ר נָדַ֜רְתָּ לַיהוָ֤ה אֱלֹהֶ֙יךָ֙ נְדָבָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר דִּבַּ֖רְתָּ בְּפִֽיךָ׃ (ס)
(24) You must fulfill what has crossed your lips and perform what you have voluntarily vowed to the LORD your God, having made the promise with your own mouth.

In Hebrew, the word "emet" (truth) is spelt "אֶמֶת". The three letters are the first (א), middle (מ), and last letter (ת) of the Hebrew Alef-Bet, respectively. As HaShem created the universe through Ten Utterances, "emet" (truth) is thus the beginning, middle, and end of all existence.