with zucchinis, indicating that often a man and his wife engage in similar actions.
בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי כְּטוֹב לֵב הַמֶּלֶךְ בַּיָּיִן אַטּוּ עַד הַשְׁתָּא לָא טָב לִבֵּיהּ בְּחַמְרָא אֲמַר רָבָא יוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי שַׁבָּת הָיָה שֶׁיִּשְׂרָאֵל אוֹכְלִין וְשׁוֹתִין מַתְחִילִין בְּדִבְרֵי תוֹרָה וּבְדִבְרֵי תִשְׁבָּחוֹת אֲבָל אוּמּוֹת הָעוֹלָם שֶׁאוֹכְלִין וְשׁוֹתִין אֵין מַתְחִילִין אֶלָּא בְּדִבְרֵי תִיפְלוּת
The verse states: “On the seventh day, when the heart of the king was merry with wine” (Esther 1:10). The Gemara asks: Is that to say that until now his heart was not merry with wine? Did it take seven days for him to achieve merriment? Rava said: The seventh day was Shabbat, when the difference between the Jewish people and the gentiles is most apparent. On Shabbat, when the Jewish people eat and drink, they begin by occupying themselves with words of Torah and words of praise for God. But the nations of the world, when they eat and drink, they begin only with words of licentiousness.
וְכֵן בִּסְעוּדָּתוֹ שֶׁל אוֹתוֹ רָשָׁע הַלָּלוּ אוֹמְרִים מָדִיּוֹת נָאוֹת וְהַלָּלוּ אוֹמְרִים פָּרְסִיּוֹת נָאוֹת אָמַר לָהֶם אֲחַשְׁוֵרוֹשׁ כְּלִי שֶׁאֲנִי מִשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בּוֹ אֵינוֹ לֹא מָדִיִּי וְלֹא פָּרְסִי אֶלָּא כַּשְׂדִּיִּי רְצוֹנְכֶם לִרְאוֹתָהּ אָמְרוּ לוֹ אִין וּבִלְבַד שֶׁתְּהֵא עֲרוּמָּה
The Gemara continues to detail what occurred at the feast. So too, at the feast of that wicked man, Ahasuerus, when the men began to converse, some said: The Median women are the most beautiful, while others said: The Persian women are the most beautiful. Ahasuerus said to them: The vessel that I use, i.e., my wife, is neither Median nor Persian, but rather Chaldean. Do you wish to see her? They said to him: Yes, provided that she be naked, for we wish to see her without any additional adornments.
שֶׁבַּמִּדָּה שֶׁאָדָם מוֹדֵד בָּהּ מוֹדְדִין לוֹ מְלַמֵּד שֶׁהָיְתָה וַשְׁתִּי הָרְשָׁעָה מְבִיאָה בְּנוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל וּמַפְשִׁיטָתָן עֲרוּמּוֹת וְעוֹשָׂה בָּהֶן מְלָאכָה בְּשַׁבָּת הַיְינוּ דִּכְתִיב אַחַר הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה כְּשׁוֹךְ חֲמַת הַמֶּלֶךְ אֲחַשְׁוֵרוֹשׁ זָכַר אֶת וַשְׁתִּי וְאֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂתָה וְאֵת אֲשֶׁר נִגְזַר עָלֶיהָ כְּשֵׁם שֶׁעָשְׂתָה כָּךְ נִגְזַר עָלֶיהָ
The Gemara comments: Vashti was punished in this humiliating way for it is with the measure that a man measures to others that he himself is measured. In other words, God punishes individuals in line with their transgressions, measure for measure. This teaches that the wicked Vashti would take the daughters of Israel, and strip them naked, and make them work on Shabbat. Therefore, it was decreed that she be brought before the king naked, on Shabbat. This is as it is written: “After these things, when the wrath of King Ahasuerus was appeased, he remembered Vashti, and what she had done, and what was decreed against her” (Esther 2:1). That is to say, just as she had done with the young Jewish women, so it was decreed upon her.
וַתְּמָאֵן הַמַּלְכָּה וַשְׁתִּי מִכְּדֵי פְּרִיצְתָּא הֲוַאי דְּאָמַר מָר שְׁנֵיהֶן לִדְבַר עֲבֵירָה נִתְכַּוְּונוּ מַאי טַעְמָא לָא אֲתַאי אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר חֲנִינָא מְלַמֵּד שֶׁפָּרְחָה בָּהּ צָרַעַת בְּמַתְנִיתָא תָּנָא [בָּא גַּבְרִיאֵל וְעָשָׂה לָהּ זָנָב]
The verse states: “But the queen Vashti refused to come” (Esther 1:12). The Gemara asks: Since she was immodest, as the Master said above: The two of them had sinful intentions, what is the reason that she did not come? Rabbi Yosei bar Ḥanina said: This teaches that she broke out in leprosy, and therefore she was embarrassed to expose herself publicly. An alternative reason for her embarrassment was taught in a baraita: The angel Gabriel came and fashioned her a tail.
וַיִּקְצֹף הַמֶּלֶךְ מְאֹד אַמַּאי דְּלַקָה בֵּיהּ כּוּלֵּי הַאי אָמַר רָבָא שְׁלַחָה לֵיהּ בַּר אַהוּרְיָירֵיהּ דְּאַבָּא אַבָּא לָקֳבֵל אַלְפָּא חַמְרָא שָׁתֵי וְלָא רָוֵי וְהָהוּא גַּבְרָא אִשְׁתַּטִּי בְּחַמְרֵיהּ מִיָּד וַחֲמָתוֹ בָּעֲרָה בוֹ
The verse continues: “Therefore the king was very wrathful, and his anger burned in him” (Esther 1:12). The Gemara asks: Why did his anger burn in him so greatly merely because she did not wish to come? Rava said: Vashti not only refused to come, but she also sent him a message by way of a messenger: You, son of my father’s stableman [ahuriyyarei]. Belshazzar, my father, drank wine against a thousand men and did not become inebriated, as the verse in Daniel (5:1) testifies about him: “Belshazzar the king made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand”; and that man, referring euphemistically to Ahasuerus himself, has become senseless from his wine. Due to her audacity, immediately “his anger burned in him” (Esther 1:12).
וַיֹּאמֶר הַמֶּלֶךְ לַחֲכָמִים מַאן חֲכָמִים רַבָּנַן יוֹדְעֵי הָעִתִּים שֶׁיּוֹדְעִין לְעַבֵּר שָׁנִים וְלִקְבּוֹעַ חֳדָשִׁים אֲמַר לְהוּ דַּיְּינוּהָ לִי אֲמַרוּ הֵיכִי נַעֲבֵיד נֵימָא לֵיהּ קִטְלַהּ לִמְחַר פָּסֵיק לֵיהּ חַמְרֵיהּ וּבָעֵי לַהּ מִינַּן נֵימָא לֵיהּ שִׁבְקַהּ קָא מְזַלְזְלָה בְּמַלְכוּתָא אָמְרוּ לוֹ מִיּוֹם שֶׁחָרַב בֵּית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ וְגָלִינוּ מֵאַרְצֵנוּ נִיטְּלָה עֵצָה מִמֶּנּוּ וְאֵין אָנוּ יוֹדְעִין לָדוּן דִּינֵי נְפָשׁוֹת זִיל לְגַבֵּי עַמּוֹן וּמוֹאָב דְּיָתְבִי בְּדוּכְתַּיְיהוּ כְּחַמְרָא דְּיָתֵיב עַל דּוּרְדְּיֵיהּ
The following verse states: “Then the king said to the wise men, who knew the times” (Esther 1:13). The Gemara asks: Who are these wise men? These wise men are the Sages of the Jewish people, who are referred to as those “who knew the times,” for they know how to intercalate years and fix the months of the Jewish calendar. Ahasuerus said to them: Judge her for me. The Sages said in their hearts: What should we do? If we say to him: Kill her, tomorrow he will become sober and then come and demand her from us. If we say to him: Let her be, she has scorned royalty, and that cannot be tolerated. Consequently, they decided not to judge the matter, and they said to him as follows: From the day that the Temple was destroyed and we have been exiled from our land, counsel and insight have been removed from us, and we do not know how to judge capital cases, as they are exceptionally difficult. Go to the people of Ammon and Moab, who have remained permanently settled in their places like wine that is settled on its lees, and so their minds are settled as well.
וְטַעְמָא אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ דִּכְתִיב שַׁאֲנַן מוֹאָב מִנְּעוּרָיו וְשׁוֹקֵט הוּא אֶל שְׁמָרָיו וְלֹא הוּרַק מִכְּלִי אֶל כֶּלִי וּבַגּוֹלָה לֹא הָלָךְ עַל כֵּן עָמַד טַעְמוֹ בּוֹ וְרֵיחוֹ לֹא נָמָר מִיָּד וְהַקָּרוֹב אֵלָיו כַּרְשְׁנָא שֵׁתָר אַדְמָתָא תַרְשִׁישׁ
And they provided a good reason when they spoke to him, as they proved that one who is settled retains his reasoning: For it is written: “Moab has been at ease from his youth, and he has settled on his lees, and has not been emptied from vessel to vessel, neither has he gone into exile; therefore his taste has remained in him, and his scent is not changed” (Jeremiah 48:11). Ahasuerus immediately acted on their advice and asked his advisors, as it is written: “And next to him was Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan” (Esther 1:14).
אָמַר רַבִּי לֵוִי כׇּל פָּסוּק זֶה עַל שׁוּם קׇרְבָּנוֹת נֶאֱמַר
Rabbi Levi said: This entire verse listing the names of the king’s advisors is stated on account of offerings. Each name alludes to an aspect of the sacrificial service that was unique to the Jewish people, which the ministering angels mentioned as merit for the Jewish people.
כַּרְשְׁנָא אָמְרוּ מַלְאֲכֵי הַשָּׁרֵת לִפְנֵי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶׁל עוֹלָם כְּלוּם הִקְרִיבוּ לְפָנֶיךָ כָּרִים בְּנֵי שָׁנָה כְּדֶרֶךְ שֶׁהִקְרִיבוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל לְפָנֶיךָ שֵׁתָר כְּלוּם הִקְרִיבוּ לְפָנֶיךָ שְׁתֵּי תוֹרִין אַדְמָתָא כְּלוּם בָּנוּ לְפָנֶיךָ מִזְבֵּחַ אֲדָמָה תַּרְשִׁישׁ כְּלוּם שִׁימְּשׁוּ לְפָנֶיךָ בְּבִגְדֵי כְהוּנָּה דִּכְתִיב בְּהוּ תַּרְשִׁישׁ וְשֹׁהַם וְיָשְׁפֵה מֶרֶס כְּלוּם מֵירְסוּ בְּדָם לְפָנֶיךָ מַרְסְנָא כְּלוּם מֵירְסוּ בִּמְנָחוֹת לְפָנֶיךָ מְמוּכָן כְּלוּם הֵכִינוּ שֻׁלְחָן לְפָנֶיךָ
“Carshena”; the ministering angels said before the Holy One, Blessed be He: Master of the Universe, did the gentiles ever offer before You lambs [karim] of the first year [shana], as the Jewish people have offered before You? “Shethar”; have they ever offered before You two turtledoves [shetei torim]? “Admatha”; have they ever built before You an altar of earth [adama]? “Tarshish”; have they ever ministered before You in the priestly vestments, as it is written that on the fourth of the four rows of precious stones contained on the breastplate were: “A beryl [tarshish], an onyx, and a jasper” (Exodus 28:20). “Meres”; have they ever stirred [meirsu] the blood of the offerings before You? “Marsena”; have they ever stirred [meirsu] the meal-offering before You? “Memucan”; have they ever prepared [hekhinu] the table before You, on which the shewbread was placed?
וַיֹּאמֶר מְמוּכָן תָּנָא מְמוּכָן זֶה הָמָן וְלָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמוֹ מְמוּכָן שֶׁמּוּכָן לְפוּרְעָנוּת אָמַר רַב כָּהֲנָא מִכָּאן שֶׁהַהֶדְיוֹט קוֹפֵץ בָּרֹאשׁ
The verse states: “And Memucan said” (Esther 1:16). A Sage taught in a baraita: Memucan is Haman. And why is Haman referred to as Memucan? Because he was prepared [mukhan] to bring calamity upon the Jewish people. Rav Kahana said: From here we see that the common man jumps to the front and speaks first, for Memucan was mentioned last of the king’s seven advisors, and nevertheless he expressed his opinion first.
לִהְיוֹת כׇּל אִישׁ שׂוֹרֵר בְּבֵיתוֹ אָמַר רָבָא אִלְמָלֵא אִגְּרוֹת הָרִאשׁוֹנוֹת לֹא נִשְׁתַּיֵּיר מִשּׂוֹנְאֵיהֶן שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל שָׂרִיד וּפָלִיט
The king sent out letters to the people of all his provinces, in which it was written: “That every man shall wield authority in his own house and speak according to the language of his people” (Esther 1:22). Rava said: Were it not for the first letters sent by Ahasuerus, which everybody discounted, there would not have been left among the enemies of the Jewish people, a euphemism for the Jewish people themselves, a remnant or a refugee. Since these first letters were the subject of ridicule, people didn’t take the king seriously and did not immediately act upon the directive of the later letters, calling for the Jewish people’s destruction.
אָמְרִי מַאי הַאי דְּשַׁדַּיר לַן לִהְיוֹת כׇּל אִישׁ שׂוֹרֵר בְּבֵיתוֹ פְּשִׁיטָא אֲפִילּוּ קָרָחָה בְּבֵיתֵיהּ פַּרְדַּשְׁכָּא לֶיהֱוֵי
The Gemara continues. The reason that the first letters were not taken seriously is that they who received them would say: What is this that he has sent us: “That every man shall wield authority in his own house”? This is obvious; even a lowly weaver is commander [paredashekha] in his house. If so, why then did the king find it necessary to make such a proclamation?
וְיַפְקֵד הַמֶּלֶךְ פְּקִידִים אָמַר רַבִּי מַאי דִּכְתִיב כׇּל עָרוּם יַעֲשֶׂה בְדָעַת וּכְסִיל יִפְרֹשׂ אִוֶּלֶת
The verse describes Ahasuerus’s search for a new wife by stating: “And let the king appoint officers in all the provinces of his kingdom, that they may gather together all the fair young virgins unto Shushan the castle” (Esther 2:3). Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said: What is the meaning of that which is written: “In everything a prudent man acts with knowledge, but a fool unfolds his folly” (Proverbs 13:16)? The verse highlights the difference between two kings’ approaches to finding a wife.
כׇּל עָרוּם יַעֲשֶׂה בְדָעַת זֶה דָּוִד דִּכְתִיב וַיֹּאמְרוּ לוֹ עֲבָדָיו יְבַקְשׁוּ לַאדֹנִי הַמֶּלֶךְ נַעֲרָה בְתוּלָה כֹּל מַאן דַּהֲוָה לֵיהּ בְּרַתָּא אַיָּיתַהּ נִיהֲלֵיהּ וּכְסִיל יִפְרוֹשׁ אִוֶּלֶת זֶה אֲחַשְׁוֵרוֹשׁ דִּכְתִיב וְיַפְקֵד הַמֶּלֶךְ פְּקִידִים כֹּל מַאן דַּהֲוָה לֵיהּ בְּרַתָּא אַיטְמְרַהּ מִינֵּיהּ
“In everything a prudent man acts with knowledge”; this statement is referring to David, who also sought a wife for himself, as it is written: “And his servants said to him, Let there be sought for my lord the king a young virgin” (I Kings 1:2). Since he sought one maiden, whoever had a daughter brought her to him, for everyone wanted his daughter to be the king’s wife. With regard to the continuation of the verse: “But a fool unfolds his folly” (Proverbs 13:16), this statement is referring to Ahasuerus, as it is written: “And let the king appoint officers” to seek out many maidens. Since it became clear that the king would have relations with all of them, but in the end he would choose only one as his bride, whoever had a daughter hid her from him.
אִישׁ יְהוּדִי הָיָה בְּשׁוּשַׁן הַבִּירָה וְגוֹ׳ אִישׁ יְמִינִי מַאי קָאָמַר אִי לְיַחוֹסֵיהּ קָאָתֵי לְיַחֲסֵיהּ וְלֵיזִיל עַד בִּנְיָמִין אֶלָּא מַאי שְׁנָא הָנֵי
The verse that initially describes Mordecai states: “There was a certain Jew in Shushan the castle, whose name was Mordecai the son of Jair the son of Shimei the son of Kish, a Benjamite” (Esther 2:5). The Gemara asks: What is it conveying in the verse by saying the names of Mordecai’s ancestors? If the verse in fact comes to trace his ancestry, it should continue tracing his lineage back all the way to Benjamin, the founder of his tribe. Rather, what is different about these names that they deserve special mention?
תָּנָא כּוּלָּן עַל שְׁמוֹ נִקְרְאוּ בֶּן יָאִיר בֵּן שֶׁהֵאִיר עֵינֵיהֶם שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל בִּתְפִלָּתוֹ בֶּן שִׁמְעִי בֵּן שֶׁשָּׁמַע אֵל תְּפִלָּתוֹ בֶּן קִישׁ שֶׁהִקִּישׁ עַל שַׁעֲרֵי רַחֲמִים וְנִפְתְּחוּ לוֹ
The Gemara answers: A Sage taught the following baraita: All of them are names by which Mordecai was called. He was called “the son of Jair” because he was the son who enlightened [heir] the eyes of all of the Jewish people with his prayers; “the son of Shimei” because he was the son whom God heard [shama] his prayers; “the son of Kish” because he knocked [hikish] on the gates of mercy and they were opened to him.
קָרֵי לֵיהּ יְהוּדִי אַלְמָא מִיהוּדָה קָאָתֵי וְקָרֵי לֵיהּ יְמִינִי אַלְמָא מִבִּנְיָמִין קָאָתֵי אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן מָרְדֳּכַי מוּכְתָּר בְּנִימוּסוֹ הָיָה
The Gemara points out a contradiction: Mordecai is referred to as a “Jew [Yehudi],” apparently indicating that he came from the tribe of Judah, but in the continuation of the verse he is called “Benjamite” [Yemini], which indicates that he came from the tribe of Benjamin. Rav Naḥman said: Mordecai was crowned with honorary names. Yehudi is one such honorary epithet, due to its allusion to the royal tribe of Judah, but it is not referring to Mordecai’s tribal affiliation.
אָמַר רַבָּה בַּר בַּר חָנָה אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן לֵוִי אָבִיו מִבִּנְיָמִין וְאִמּוֹ מִיהוּדָה וְרַבָּנַן אָמְרִי מִשְׁפָּחוֹת מִתְגָּרוֹת זוֹ בָּזוֹ מִשְׁפַּחַת יְהוּדָה אוֹמֶרֶת אֲנָא גְּרַמִי דְּמִתְיְלִיד מָרְדֳּכַי דְּלָא קַטְלֵיהּ דָּוִד לְשִׁמְעִי בֶּן גֵּרָא וּמִשְׁפַּחַת בִּנְיָמִין אָמְרָה מִינַּאי קָאָתֵי
Rabba bar bar Ḥana said that Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said an alternative explanation: Mordecai’s father was from the tribe of Benjamin, and his mother was from the tribe of Judah. Therefore, he was both a Yemini, a Benjamite, and a Yehudi, from the tribe of Judah. And the Rabbis say that the dual lineage is due to a dispute: The families competed with each other over which tribe could take credit for Mordecai. The family of Judah would say: I caused the birth of Mordecai, as only because David did not kill Shimei, the son of Gera, when he cursed him (see II Samuel 16) was it possible for Mordecai to be born later from his descendants. And the family of Benjamin said in response: In the end he came from me, as he in fact was from Benjamin’s tribe.
רָבָא אָמַר כְּנֶסֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל אָמְרָה לְאִידַּךְ גִּיסָא רְאוּ מָה עָשָׂה לִי יְהוּדִי וּמָה שִׁילֵּם לִי יְמִינִי מָה עָשָׂה לִי יְהוּדִי
Rava said: The Congregation of Israel at the time said this from the opposite perspective, not as a boast, but as a complaint, remarking: See what a Judean has done to me and how a Benjamite has repaid me. What a Judean has done to me is referring to