Introduction to Twelve Minor Prophets – Trei Asar

ת"ר סדרן של נביאים יהושע ושופטים שמואל ומלכים ירמיה ויחזקאל ישעיה ושנים עשר מכדי הושע קדים דכתיב (הושע א, ב) תחלת דבר ה' בהושע וכי עם הושע דבר תחלה והלא ממשה ועד הושע כמה נביאים היו וא"ר יוחנן שהיה תחלה לארבעה נביאים שנתנבאו באותו הפרק ואלו הן הושע וישעיה עמוס ומיכה וליקדמיה להושע ברישא כיון דכתיב נבואתיה גבי חגי זכריה ומלאכי וחגי זכריה ומלאכי סוף נביאים הוו חשיב ליה בהדייהו וליכתביה לחודיה וליקדמיה איידי דזוטר מירכס

Our Rabbis taught: The order of the Prophets is: Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Isaiah* and the Twelve Minor Prophets. Let us examine this. Hosea came first, as it is written "G-d spoke first to Hosea" (Hosea 1:2). But did G-d speak first to Hosea? Were there not many prophets between Moses and Hosea? R. Johanan, however, has explained that [what it means is] he was the first of the four prophets who prophesied at the period, namely, Hosea, Isaiah, Amos and Micah.

Should not then Hosea come first [that is, before Jeremiah and the other prophets]? Since his prophecy is written along with those of Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi, and Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi came at the end of the prophets, he is reckoned with them. But why should he not be written separately and placed first? Since his book is so small, it might be lost.

*Note that the order of the three major prophets in the Masoretic text is Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel. The Talmud here refers to a different ordering (and gives reasoning for it later in this passage).

Does the above make sense to you as an explanation of why Twelve Prophets are combined into one book? Can you think of other reasons why combining these Twelve prophets would make sense? Does their placement at the end of the section of the prophets make sense to you?

כדתניא הרבה נביאים עמדו להם לישראל כפלים כיוצאי מצרים אלא נבואה שהוצרכה לדורות נכתבה ושלא הוצרכה לא נכתבה

It has been taught [in a baraita]: Many prophets stood for Israel, double the number of those who left Egypt, but prophecies that were necessary for the generations were written down, and those that weren’t necessary, were not written down.

We will continue to refer back to this text as we discuss the relevance of the prophets we are studying. For each text we study we can consider, how is this prophecy necessary for our generation?